“We perceive a world of great diversity, but numerous things are composed of about a hundred different chemical elements, among them are hydrogen, carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, iron, and uranium....“These elements are combined with one another in a multitude of ways to produce complexity of all objects.
“However, there are only 3 nucleosynthetic astrophysical sites:
- (i) big bang nucleosynthesis, where hydrogen and helium are produced;
- (ii) stars, where all elements from carbon to uranium are synthesized and
- (iii) interstellar medium in galaxies where lithium (a part of), beryllium and boron are made by non-thermal collisions between cosmic rays and interstellar matter.
“The origin of the atoms is now well understood. It is one of the greatest astrophysical discovery in the twentieth century. All the elements in the Mendeleev table, and atoms of life CHNOPS: specifically, the carbon, nitrogen and oxygen, come from the work of all generations of stars in galaxies.
- (Giga years, 1 Gyr = 1 billion years in astrophysics)
“Presently, after 13.8 Gyr (13.8 Billion years) atomic matter in the universe is composed of 70% hydrogen, 28% helium and only about 2% by mass, of all the other elements. Complex (and also some specific light) atoms are rare in the Universe. [Eli Vangioni, Michel Cassé (2017) Cosmic origin of chemical elements rarity in nuclear astrophysics, Front Life Science, 10:1, 84-97]
“The use of fusion power plants could substantially reduce the environmental impacts of increasing world electricity demands since, like nuclear fission power, they would not contribute to acid rain or the greenhouse effect. Fusion power could easily satisfy the energy needs associated with continued economic growth, given the ready availability of fuels.
“While fusion power clearly has much to offer when the technology is eventually developed, the problems associated with it also need to be addressed if it is to become a widely used future energy source.”....Because of problems in development, currently earthly humans technology cannot accomplish the Nuclear Fusion mission. Nuclear Fission is a different subject.
“While fusion power clearly has much to offer when the technology is eventually developed, the problems associated with it also need to be addressed if it is to become a widely used future energy source. [ Nuclear Fusion Power, Updated October 2018 World Nuclear Association]
Pictured above are the Deuterium nucleus H² with 1 proton and 1 neutron in the nucleus, which was secondary to nucleosynthesis, and an unusual chemical reaction. The atom hydrogen-1 (Hᶦ) normally should have no neutron in the nucleus. The usual light hydrogen, which has no neutrons has 1 proton in the nucleus and 1 electron in its outer electron ring and makes-up 99.9885% of the naturally occurring H in the universe. Deuterium (H²) formation from 2 minutes to 20 minutes following the Big Bang, was an unusual step, but necessary for the fomation of the atomic elelmelnts CHNOPS, necessarry for all life including Human life.
Also pictured is a simulation of our Multi-Universe composed of multiple connected and layered universes. Pictured 3rd is a schematic of a Human DNA double helix, which has 46 chromosomes, 23 pairs of chromosomes from each parent, following the conception of life, fertilization. Details follow below.
- So what on earth, accurately speaking, do Deuterium, Multi-Universe and DNA have in common? What do God's Creation and Human creativity have in common?
The following example is not a typical example for science, but an every day example, many have experienced. Making football defensive football players miss tackling a running back carrying the football is one of the most creative maneuvers executed by the human mind.Running backs will tell you each and every creative defensive player missed maneuver is never the same in real time. There might just be an eye blink, finger twitch to a stiff arm or ankle cut back, but never the same.
Both the defensive potential tackler and running backs never reproduce the exact same movements. Missing tackles movements are ‘on the fly’, made quickly while in progressive motion. Imagine how many movements by both players are in one missed tackle. Missed tackles cannot be planned and predicted in the huddle or programed on a computer, because missed tackles are ‘on the fly creative’. Missed tackles movements require total Mindfulness or concentration.
Going Short, in either the a. instantaneous, discernable or b. thoughtful, meditative creativity modes, microtubule memeristors (neural biological resistors) can sort through, select or filter neuronal electric current and vibrational stimuli and then:
- reduce current flow, adjust signal levels, divide voltages, select active elements, terminate transmissions, dissipate many watts of electrical power into heat,
- and then transmit the signals to power distribution systems, controls neuro network thinking, praying, singing, playing football, memorizing, motor and all other mental actions for mindfulness,
- while changing with temperature, time, volume and operating voltage
- and act as sensing devices for heat, light, humidity, force, or chemical activity
- while also implementing 2 fundamental human mind methods and exploit at least 2 conformations of microtubuli
- 1) act as values of a quantum bit system and form ubiquitous cell support structures and the quantumness of motor proteins solve complex computational problems in the brain
- 2) or acts of consciousness would be linked to a gravity-induced objective collapse of the quantum wave function (Hameroff & Penrose, 1996). Orchestrated reduction, decoherence
- Going Long DNA creativity is a lengthy adjustment to adversities, trials and tribulations process of evolution and natural selection
- References:
- [1. Harder, Douglas Wilhelm. "Resistors: A Motor with a Constant Force (Force Source)". Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Waterloo. Retrieved 9 November 2014.
- [2. Farago, P.S. (1961) An Introduction to Linear Network Analysis, pp. 18–21, The English Universities Press Ltd.
- [3. Wu, F. Y. (2004). "Theory of resistor networks: The two-point resistance". Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General. 37 (26): 6653. arXiv]
- [Orchestrated reduction of quantum coherence in brain microtubules: A model for consciousness Stuart Hameroff a,,, Roger Penrose b a Departments of Anesthesiolo(ly and Psycholoyy, University of Arizona, 1501 North Campbell Avenue, Tucson, Arizona 85724, USA b Rouse Ball Professor of Mathematics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 40 (1996) 453-480
Penrose and Hameroff suggest a connection between brain biomolecular processes and fine-scale structure of the universe. (mbm Planck Scale) Consciousness depends on biologically 'orchestrated' quantum computations in collections of microtubules (MT) within brain neurons (Penrose 1989, 1994); these quantum computations correlate and regulate neuronal activity.
The continuous Schrödinger evolution of each quantum computation terminates in accordance with the specific Diósi–Penrose (DP) scheme of 'objective reduction' of the quantum state (OR). This orchestrated OR activity (Orch OR) is present in a moment of conscious awareness and/or conscious choice. This particular (DP) form of OR is taken to be a quantum-gravity process related to the fundamentals of space-time geometry, so Orch OR suggests a connection between brain biomolecular processes and the universal structure.
“Self-awareness is the capacity for introspection and the ability to recognize oneself as an individual separate from the environment and other individuals.[1] It is not to be confused with consciousness in the sense of qualia. While consciousness is being aware of one's environment and body and lifestyle, self-awareness is the recognition of that awareness.[2] Self-awareness is how an individual consciously knows and understands their own character, feelings, motives, and desires. There are two broad categories of self-awareness: internal self-awareness and external self-awareness.[3]
"There are questions regarding what part of the brain allows us to be self-aware and how we are biologically programmed to be self-aware. V.S. Ramachandran has speculated that mirror neurons may provide the neurological basis of human self-awareness.[4] In an essay written for the Edge Foundation in 2009,
"Ramachandran gave the following explanation of his theory: "... I also speculated that these miror neurons can not only help simulate other people's behavior but can be turned 'inward'—as it were—to create second-order representations or meta-representations of your own earlier brain processes. This could be the neural basis of introspection, and of the reciprocity of self awareness and other awareness. There is obviously a chicken-or-egg question here as to which evolved first, but... The main point is that the two co-evolved, mutually enriching each other to create the mature representation of self that characterizes modern humans."[5]
- "Self-awareness - Definition of Self-awareness by Merriam-Webster".
- Jabr, Ferris (2012). "Self-Awareness with a Simple Brain". Scientific American Mind. 23 (5): 28–29. doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind1112-28. Retrieved 25 November 2014.
- "What Self-Awareness Really Is (and How to Cultivate It)". Harvard Business Review. 2018-01-04. Retrieved 2018-03-06.
- Oberman, L.; Ramachandran, V.S. (2009). "Reflections on the Mirror Neuron System: Their Evolutionary Functions Beyond Motor Representation". In Pineda, J.A. Mirror Neuron Systems: The Role of Mirroring Processes in Social Cognition. Humana Press. pp. 39–62. ISBN 978-1-934115-34-3.
- Ramachandran, V.S. (January 1, 2009). "Self Awareness: The Last Frontier, Edge Foundation web essay". Retrieved July 26, 2011. [Wikipedia]
“Humans have a unique capacity to contemplate not only their status quo, but also their ideal status quo. This capacity is emhanced by the ability to imagine a future that is better than the past, evaluate alternatives, identify problems, make comparisons and develop a motivation to improve and progress toward an ideal.
Intertwined are processes of self-reflexive thought, self-examination, and introspection. All of the above characteristics broadly define and localize the construct of Self-Awareness NeuroNetwork and although conceptualizations of self-awareness do vary, at their core is an ability to focus attention inward and study oneself as though looking in a mirror at times alone and other times with Comparison Companions.
- Artificial Intelligence will never develop a Self-Awareness NeuroNetwork with comparisons
- Self-Awareness NeuroNetwork with comparisons did not emerge spontaneously
- Self-Awareness NeuroNetwork with Comparison Companions is another phenonmenon which strongly supports Intelligent Design Creation
- A #Human Brain NeuroNetwork's judgmental introspection of another of its own #Human Brain NeuroNetwork's functions and then a comparison with other ^Human Persons' Mental Functions and subsequently make corrections of its own #Human Brain NeuroNetwork, when it judged #itself 'ineffective', is mind-boggling and strongly supports Intelligent Design Creation
- Please review the 'Neuron Brain Cell Perception' diagram above for a modest explanation
“The relevance of self-awareness cannot be overstated. In fact, Leary and Buttermore (2003) theorize that the capacity for self-reflection may have been one of essential drivers for the remarkably rapid appearance of human civilization 40,000 - 60,000 years ago. Leary and Buttermore attribute the explosive growth in human culture and technological advances during this time to a nascent capacity to think symbolically and abstractly about oneself and to ponder the changes required to move toward a better future.
“Self-awareness especially is important in the context of adaption, transition, and changes because this context speaks most directly to the issue of self/standard gaps. In other words, there may be many situations where a measure of self-awareness explains variance in failures as well as successes. To the extent this is true then mitigation efforts can be put in place.
[Ashley, Greg C. and Reiter-Palmon, Roni, "Self-Awareness and the Evolution of Leaders: The Need for a Better Measure of SelfAwareness" (2012).Psychology Faculty Publications. 7. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/psychfacpub/7]
Recently Arndt et al (2009) demonstrated that there are some instances in biology in which quantum entanglement and the states of superposition and reductionism could be important. The most exciting macroscopical and ‘hot’ non-equilibrium systems we know are, of course, the living ones. Consciousness may depend on biologically ‘orchestrated’ coherent quantum processes in collections of microtubules within brain neurons. These quantum processes correlate with, and regulate, neuronal synaptic and membrane activity, and that the continuous Schrodinger evolution of each such process terminates the quantum state. As such, viewing the human brain and the creation of new ideas as part of a quantum system can provide the framework for deep insights into the Holy Grail of Human Evolution.
- References
- Heisenberg, W. (1927), Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik, Zeitschrift für Physik 43 (3–4): 172–198, Bibcode:1927ZPhy...43..172H, doi:10.1007/BF01397280.. Annotated pre-publication proof sheet of Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik, March 23, 1927.
- Penrose, R. (1989) The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds and The Laws of Physics. Oxord, UK: Oxford University Press
- Hameroff, S.R., and Penrose, R., (1996) Orchestrated reduction of quantum coherence in brain microtubules: A model for consciousness. In: Toward a Science of Consciousness - The First Tucson Discussions and Debates, S.R. Hameroff, A. Kaszniak and A.C. Scott (eds.), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
- Arndt, M., Aspelmeyer, M. & Zeilinger, A. (2009). How to extend quantum experiments. Fortschritte der Physik, Volume 57, Issue 11-12, pages 1153–1162, November 2009
- Vedral, V. (2010). Decoding Reality: The Universe as Quantum Information. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
Artificial Intelligence cannot reproduce the Human Mind, Consciousness and an artificial Mind with a Mirror Image Neural Network, which are non-computational. The Mind is a Miracle. Non-programed, creativity, improvisation, and self-awareness indicate Intelligent Design. Electromagnetic creativity signals into, within and away from the Brain’s Mind and DNA indicate an irreproducible Intelligent Design source.
The gifted mathematical physicist Sir Roger Penrose believes that computers will never be creative.1 So does Gregory Chirikjian, Director of the Johns Hopkins Whiting School’s Robot Laboratory: “Nor will robots be able to exhibit any form of creativity or sentience, capacity to feel, perceive or experience personally.”2 Robots will never be able to play football exactly like humans in the Super Bowl.
“Whether Inscribed hieroglyphics, are written in a book, encoded in a radio signal, or written on an Egyptian tomb, all 3 always arise from an intelligent source. The discovery of comparable hieroglyphic-like (sic) information in the DNA molecule provides strong grounds for concluding that Intelligent Design played a role in the origin of DNA.” [Yes, Intelligent Design Is Detectable by Science by Stephen C. Meyer, Evolution News, April 24, 2018]
- We define creativity in the sense of the Lovelace Test: See Bringsjord, Selmer, Paul Bello, and David Ferrucci. “Creativity, the Turing Test, and the (better) Lovelace test,” Minds and Machines 11:3-27, 2001. Also see Robert J. Marks II, “The Turing Test Is Dead. Long Live the Lovelace Test,” Evolution News and Views, July 3, 2014
- Gregory Chirikjian, “Help Wanted for the Cognitive Era,” JHU Robotics Center, Summer 2017, p.44
- [One model of consciousness would mean that conscious computers are a physical impossibility by ROBERT J. MARKS, NOVEMBER 27, 2018 Mind Matters]
Sir Roger Penrose(b. 1931) was asked, "Is there a materialist explanation for those areas in which humans display powers that computers seemingly cannot imitate (sometimes called “human exceptionality”)? Yes. But it is highly speculative. The gifted mathematical physicist Sir Roger Penrose believes that computers will never be creative.1 So does Gregory Chirikjian, Director of the Johns Hopkins Whiting School’s Robot Laboratory: Nor will robots be able to exhibit any form of creativity or sentience.2
The current President of Microsoft, Satya Nadella, agrees: One of the most coveted human skill is creativity, and this won’t change. Machines will enrich and augment our creativity, but the human drive to create will remain central.3 Why are they so sure? Various public figures, including astronomer Sir Martin Rees, robotics entrepreneur Elon Musk, presidential adviser Henry Kissinger, and astrophysicist Stephen Hawking have all predicted that thinking computers that will run the world and/or run humanity out of it. Are there issues that Chirikjian and Nadella, who work in the field, are taking into account that the others are not?
One issue to be aware of is this: Artificial Intelligence is performed by computers and computers are entirely algorithmic. That is to say, they are constrained to obey a set of operations written by a computer programmer. Mathematics is algorithmically constructed, based on logic and foundational axioms. And physics is built algorithmically on foundational laws. In this sense, common naturalistic phenomena are largely algorithmic. They operate according to the logic of mathematics and the laws of physics.
Christians, Doctors, Neurologists, Physicists, investigators, instructors, tradespersons and all Humans must improvise, create and invent, methods to adapt, cope, manage, explain and sometimes survive their difficult, complicated lifetime circumstance and job-related businesses, because Human endeavors are never exactly the same from one person to another. A perfect successful Human ‘everything recipe’ is impossible to compose.
Humans are more capable of deliberating, explaining, adapting-to and resolving all their lifetime, professional and occupational encounters and situations, unlike artificial mechanisms, because algorithms, computers, computations, robots and artificial intelligence are less capable when solving such problems.
Nothing or anyone is perfect. Humans, computations, algorithms, computers, robots and artificial intelligence are not 100% accurate, but Humans can improvise and create, which are usually required for difficult circumstances, where cookie-cutter automations are useless.
The exact recipe ingredients, for every possible Human circumstance, requiring improvision, that need to be fed into a mechanical method, in lieu of a Human Mind, are impossible to manufacture.
Research for example: “In an objective evaluation in which researchers were given slides of lymph node cells and asked to determine whether or not they contained cancer, the team’s automated diagnostic method proved accurate approximately 92 % of the time.
This nearly matched the success rate of a human pathologist; whose results were 96 % accurate.” [Artificial intelligence diagnoses with high accuracy’ Andrew Beck, MD, PhD, Director of Bioinformatics at the Cancer Research Institute at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) and an Associate Professor at Harvard Medical School. Dayong Wang, PhD and Humayun Irshad, PhD, and student Rishab Gargya, together with Aditya Khosla of the MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) and Harvard Medical School (HMS) recently developed artificial intelligence (AI) ]
Interpretations by more than 1 pathologist, most likely would have increased the Human pathologist results.
Dr. Roger Penrose wondered, "is anything in nature non-algorithmic?" He points to the collapse of a quantum mechanical wave function into a deterministic state. Such quantum effects can be found in the microtubules found in the brain.
Penrose and Stuart Hameroff, M.D., propose4 a quantum mechanical model 5. of consciousness involving the microtubules which, Hameroff notes, “is in conflict with a major premise of [strong] Artificial Intelligence (AI) and [Ray Kurzweil’s] Singularity.” 6.
Hameroff is referring to Google Director of Engineering Ray Kurzweil’s prediction that AI will be as intelligent as a human being by 2029 and that we will merge with AI by 2045 (that’s The Singularity). But, hold on, computers are limited to executing algorithms and the theory that he and Penrose propose is non-algorithmic. Non-algorithmic means, by definition, non-computable.
In other words, what Penrose and Hameroff are proposing cannot be simulated on a computer. If the Penrose-Hameroff theory or any similar theory proves to be a working model of consciousness, one implication is that we cannot generate machines that do what the brain does.
In that case, the mechanical technology that thinks like a conscious human being, if developed, will not be a computer. We would need to give it another name. If we can build a human-like brain, be afraid, be very afraid. Skynet might be right around the corner.
So far, all we have is a controversial, largely unexplored conjecture. As long as computers simply get faster and use more memory, there is no reason to worry about a self-aware Skynet. Notes:
- We define creativity in the sense of the Lovelace Test: See Bringsjord, Selmer, Paul Bello, and David Ferrucci. “Creativity, the Turing Test, and the (better) Lovelace test,” Minds and Machines 11:3-27, 2001. Also see Robert J. Marks II, “The Turing Test Is Dead. Long Live the Lovelace Test,” Evolution News and Views, July 3, 2014
- Gregory Chirikjian, “Help Wanted for the Cognitive Era,” JHU Robotics Center, Summer 2017, p.44
- Satya Nadella, Hit Refresh: The Quest to Rediscover Microsoft’s Soul and Imagine a Better Future for Everyone, Harper Business (2017)
- Hameroff, Stuart, and Roger Penrose. Consciousness in the universe: A review of the ‘Orch OR’theory.Physics of life reviews 11, no. 1 (2014): 39-78.
- Penrose and Hameroff are not proposing that the brain works like a quantum computer. Quantum computers are still constrained by the Church-Turing Thesis which says that anything that can be done today on a supercomputer can be done on Turing’s original universal machine where the operation would occur trillions of times more slowly.
- Alex Tsakiris, 133: Dr. Stuart Hameroff On Quantum Consciousness and Moving Singularity Goal Posts, Skeptiko (undated)
- [Robert J. Marks II, Ph.D., is Distinguished Professor of Engineering in the Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering at Baylor University. Marks is the founding Director of the Walter Bradley Center for Natural & Artificial Intelligence and hosts the podcast Mind Matters.
Physicist Charles Townes during an interview in his office at Birge Hall. The department celebrated Townes's 90th birthday with a symposium in the fall entitled: 'Explore as much as we can': Nobel Prize winner Charles Townes on evolution, intelligent design, and the meaning of life By Bonnie Azab Powell, NewsCenterUC Berkely 17 June 2005]
'Faith is necessary for the scientist even to get started, and deep faith is necessary for him to carry out his tougher tasks. Why? Because he must have confidence that there is order in the universe and that the human mind - in fact his own mind - has a good chance of understanding this order.' [Charles Townes, writing in "The Convergence of Science and Religion," IBM's Think magazine, March-April 1966]
"I do believe in both a creation and a continuous effect on this universe and our lives, that God has a continuing influence - certainly his laws guide how the universe was built. But the Bible's description of creation occurring over a week's time is just an analogy, as I see it. The Jews couldn't know very much at that time about the lifetime of the universe or how old it was. They were visualizing it as best they could and I think they did remarkably well, but it's just an analogy. Should intelligent design be taught alongside Darwinian evolution in schools as religious legislators have decided in Pennsylvania and Kansas?
"I think it's very unfortunate that this kind of discussion has come up. People are misusing the term intelligent design to think that everything is frozen by that one act of creation and that there's no evolution, no changes. It's totally illogical in my view. Intelligent design, as one sees it from a scientific point of view, seems to be quite real. This is a very special universe: it's remarkable that it came out just this way. If the laws of physics weren't just the way they are, we couldn't be here at all. The sun couldn't be there, the laws of gravity and nuclear laws and magnetic theory, quantum mechanics, and so on have to be just the way they are for us to be here.
Some scientists argue that "well, there's an enormous number of universes and each one is a little different. This one just happened to turn out right." Well, that's a postulate, and it's a pretty fantastic postulate - it assumes there really are an enormous number of universes and that the laws could be different for each of them. The other possibility is that ours was planned, and that's why it has come out so specially. Now, that design could include evolution perfectly well. It's very clear that there is evolution, and it's important. Evolution is here, and intelligent design is here, and they're both consistent.
"They don't have to negate each other, you're saying. God could have created the universe, set the parameters for the laws of physics and chemistry and biology, and set the evolutionary process in motion, But that's not what the Christian fundamentalists are arguing should be taught in Kansas. People who want to exclude evolution on the basis of intelligent design, I guess they're saying, "Everything is made at once and then nothing can change." But there's no reason the universe can't allow for changes and plan for them, too. People who are anti-evolution are working very hard for some excuse to be against it. I think that whole argument is a stupid one. Maybe that's a bad word to use in public, but it's just a shame that the argument is coming up that way, because it's very misleading.
"That seems to come up when religion seeks to control or limit the scope of science. We're seeing that with the regulation of research into stem cells and cloning. Should there be areas of scientific inquiry that are off-limits due to a culture's prevailing religious principles? My answer to that is, we should explore as much as we can. We should think about everything, try to explore everything, and question things. That's part of our human characteristic in nature that has made us so great and able to achieve so much. Of course there are problems if we do scientific experiments on people that involve killing them - that's a scientific experiment sure, but ethically it has problems. There are ethical issues with certain kinds of scientific experimentation. But outside of the ethical issues, I think we should try very hard to understand everything we can and to question things.
"I think it's settling those ethical issues that's the problem. Who decides what differentiates a "person" from a collection of cells, for example? That's very difficult. What is a person? We don't know. Where is this thing, me - where am I really in this body? Up here in the top of the head somewhere What is personality? What is consciousness? We don't know. The same thing is true once the body is dead: where is this person? Is it still there? Has it gone somewhere else? If you don't know what it is, it's hard to say what it's doing next. We have to be open minded about that. The best we can do is try to find ways of answering those questions.
More information:
- Harry Kreisler's Conversations With History interview with Charles Townes, February 2000
- Townes's essay, "Convergence of Science and Religion," first published, IBM's Think magazine, March-April 1966
- "Master planned: why intelligent design isn't," H. Allen Orr, New Yorker, May 30, 2005;
- "The crusade against evolution," Evan Ratliffe, Wired, October 2004
- Scientific facts:
- The elements for life, CHNOPS, were Created during our Universe’s age 2 minutes to 20 minutes, 13.8 billion years ago.
- Earth began circling the sun ~4.6 billion years ago.
- Simple one cell life began ~3.6 billion years ago.
- Anatomically modern erect on 2 feet humans, Homo sapien were Created and were present and account for 200,000 years ago.
- The Human brain was encoded for the belief in God, Spirituality, Religiousness, worship, prayer, and meditation and subject to Darwinian evolution and natural selection also created by God for the belief in God Process. Homo sapien-sapiens, modern anatomical, cognition humans, Adam and Eve allegorically were created by God ~ 50,000 -70,000 years ago and evolved with primitive intelligence, descended from modern anatomical humans, Homo sapien species.
- The Final Stage of Human Creation is the Neuroanatomy encoded within the Human brain, the structure for the Neurological encoded ‘God Module Network’ a subnetwork of Mental Consciousness, mindful cognition, for ‘Human spiritual, religious, meditation, faith and belief practices, experiences and realities and Soulfulness, created by God.
- Scientists believe the Pentatonic Scale, the preferred, perceived, integrated, sensory signal, was ‘encoded’ in all members of the Animal Kingdom millions of years ago and in accordance more recently in Human Brain Neuro-Anatomy and Neuro-Physiology for Human spirituality, religious, meditation and soulfulness, the Final Stage of Human Neurobiological Brain Creation.
- Religions began 5000 years ago.
- Abraham, the ‘father’of 3 Abrahamic religions, Judaism, Islam and Christianity, was born approximately 2000 BC
- Moses about 1440 BC
- David 1000 BC (Before Christ) [Jewish Virtual Library: Abraham] [The Timeline between Adam and Jesus, Burt Lockwood, Blogos]
- There are eons between Christianisation of the St. Arbogast Church and Neruonal Microtubules pictured above.
The Logic of DNA Replication Makes a Case for Intelligent Design
Why do I think God exists? In short: The elegance, sophistication, and ingenuity of biochemical systems—and their astonishing similarity to man made systems—convinces me that God is responsible for life’s origin and design.
While many skeptics readily acknowledge the remarkable designs of biochemical systems, they would disagree with my conclusion about God’s existence. Why? Because for every biochemical system I point to that displays beauty and elegance, they can point to one that seems to be poorly designed. In their view, these substandard designs reflect life’s evolutionary origin. They argue that evolutionary mechanisms kludged together the cell’s chemical systems through a historically contingent process that co-opted preexisting systems, cobbling them together to form new biochemical systems.
According to skeptics, one doesn’t have to look hard to find biochemical systems that seem to have been put together in a haphazard manner, and DNA replication appears to be an example of this. In many respects, DNA replication lies at the heart of the cell’s chemical operations. If designed by a Creator, this biochemical system, above all others, should epitomize intelligent design. Yet the DNA replication process appears to be unwieldy, inefficient, and unduly complex—the type of system evolution would generate by force, not the type of system worthy to be designated the product of the Creator’s handiwork.
Yet new work by Japanese researchers helps explain why DNA replication is the way it is.1Instead of reflecting the cumbersome product of an unguided evolutionary history, the DNA replication process displays an exquisite molecular logic. To appreciate the significance of the Japanese study and its implication for the creation / evolution controversy, a short biochemistry primer is in order. For readers who are familiar with DNA’s structure and the DNA replication process, you can skip the next two sections.
Please read the complete details at Link: https://twobrothersweblog.com/2016/11/09/the-logic-of-dna-replication-makes-a-case-for-intelligent-design
Ironically, if DNA replication could proceed in two directions, there still would be a leading and a lagging strand. Why? Because bottom-to-top replication is a two-step process and would proceed more slowly than the single step of top-to-bottom replication. In other words, the assembly of the DNA strand in a bottom-to-top direction would lag behind the assembly of the DNA strand that traveled in a top-to-bottom direction. Bidirectional DNA replication would also cause another complication due to a crowding effect. Once the replication bubble opens, both sets of replication enzymes would have to fit into the replication bubble’s constrained space. This molecular overcrowding would further compromise the efficiency of the replication process. Overcrowding is not an issue for unidirectional DNA replication that proceeds in a top-to-bottom direction.
The bottom line: In light of this new insight, it is hard to argue that DNA replication has been cobbled together via a historically contingent pathway. Instead, it is looking more and more like a process ingenuously designed by a Divine Mind.
- Resources
- The Cell’s Design: How Chemistry Reveals the Creator’s Artistry by Fazale Rana (book)
- “DNA Soaks Up Sun’s Rays” by Fazale Rana (article)
- “DNA: Designed for Flexibility” by Fazale Rana (article)
- “How the Central Dogma of Molecular Biology Points to Design” by Fazale Rana (article)“Why I Believe God Exists: Evidences from a Biochemist” by Fazale Rana (video)
- [The Logic of DNA Replication Makes a Case for Intelligent Design
- Douglas Duncan The Cell's Design with Fazale Rana November 9, 2016,video, Two Brothers]
Intelligent Design
‘Experts’ discuss the struggle between Darwin’s Natural Selection-Evolution and Intelligent Design controversy. Most contemporary scientists belief there is no controversy, because[MM1] Darwin’s Natural Selection-Evolution and Intelligent Design work hand in hand. The following explains the ‘why’.
Immediately after our Hypernova Big Bang explosion, approximately 13.8 Billion years ago, for a brief, fleeting time, the surrounding energy and temperature of our miniscule Universe singular point dropped to the very specific, critical Creation level:
- At our Universe’s age of 2 minutes, after the Big Bang Hypernova, the temperature cooled from the explosion to below 1.2 billion degrees Kelvin (2,159,999,540.3 °Fahrenheit). At this temperature, the average ambient photon energy was 1.8 x 10-14 joules, which was perfect binding energy of a deuterium nucleus (nuclear fusion, nucleosynthesis) . [Prof. Barbara Ryden (ryden@astronomy.ohio-state.edu) 2003 Mar 12]
- The exact temperature amd emergy for the nuclear fusion reaction, binding the first Deuterium nucleus (²H) in our Universe
- Creations proceeded to atoms and ultimately our Universe entirety
- “Nuclear fusion was the first step in the Creation process”
- According to scientists the Creation of Deuterium (²H), which resulted from the extreme temperatures and other energy conditions revealed that Creation was too high tech, precisely, instantly intended to be a random event
- Deuterium creation, a controlled event, required God’s Intervention. (Intelligent Design IMHSMO)
- “Controlled nuclear fusion, is God’s Creation energy”
- “Multi-Universe Creation is another strong argument for God's existence” according to scientists
- Without 1.2 billion degrees Kelvin temperature and ambient photon energy was 1.8 x 10-14 joules, from His Intervention, Intelligent Design, repeated over and over again, Multi-Universe formation and subsequent Creations, would fissile as other explosive random events
- This is current scientific information
- Rapid emergence of the 1st evidence of life in our Solar System and Unvierse was shown by discovery of 3,700-Billion-year-old, one cell, microbial structures. Tiny bacteria that lived 3.7 Billion years ago.
- Scientists new study in 2017 probing a newly exposed, formerly snow-covered outcropping in Greenland claim they have discovered the oldest fossils ever seen, the remnants of microbial mats that lived 3.7 billion years ago. Australian researchers Allen Nutman and Vickie Bennett hold a 3.7-billion-year-old fossilized stromatolite from Isua, Greenland. (Yuri Amelin)
- nuclear fusion, nucleosynthesis, of Deuterium nuclei was a onetime only atypical event, in our universe history, which was necessary for the formation of the 6 atomic elements, CHNOPS, Carbon Hydrogen Nitrogen Oxygen Phosphorous Sulfur with atomic numbers equal to or less than 16 which are/were necessary for all life on earth i.e.“ CHNOPS Organisms”
- In 1968, Dr Harold Joseph Morowitz per citation referred to Earth-Based Humans, Animals, Plants, and Bacteria as “CHNOPS Organisms”.[Energy Flow in Biology: Biological Organization as a Problem in Thermal Physics. Academic Press, Harold Joseph Morowitz, (1968)]. [Harold Joseph Morowitz (December 4, 1927 – March 22, 2016) was an American biophysicist, Yale University, NASA consultant]
It's a stunning announcement in a scientific field that is always contentious. But if confirmed, this would push the established fossil record more than 200 million years deeper into the Earth’s early history, and provide support for the view that life appeared very soon after the Earth formed and may be commonplace throughout the universe. A team of Australian geologists announced their discovery in a paper titled “Rapid emergence of life shown by discovery of 3,700-million-year-old microbial structures,” published Wednesday in Nature.
This remains a matter of conjecture and philosophy, because no one has discovered a sign of extraterrestrial life. The early dates for the origin of life on Earth also could suggest that complex, multi-cellular life (including, perhaps, an intelligent and technological species) typically arises on a planet only after a very long period of evolution and diversification. [Allen P. Nutman, Vickie C. Bennett, Clark R. L. Friend, Martin J. Van Kranendonk, Allan R. Chivas. Rapid emergence of life shown by discovery of 3,700-million-year-old microbial structures. Nature, 2016; DOI: 10.1038/nature19355]
Immediately after our Hypernova Big Bang explosion, approximately 13.8 billion years ago, Our Creator created the energy reactions that dropped the temperature of our Universe to the very specific, critical Creation level. Immediately after the Hypernova the following brief, fleeting periods of Universe formation evolved:
- At our Universe’s age of 2 minutes, the temperature cooled from the explosion to “1.2 billion degrees Kelvin, (3,599,999,540.3°F), for a very brief period, the exact level of energy and temperature for nuclear fusion and binding the first Deuterium nucleus.” [Astronomy 162: Professor Barbara Ryden]
- “Nuclear fusion is the first step in the Creation process.”
- “With wisdom God created the heavens and the earth. [Gerald Schroeder, Ph.D., MIT in nuclear physics and earth science] I’m with Schroeder.
- At our Universe’s age of 300,000-1 billion years atoms, stars, plasma formed At our Universe’s age of 1 billion to present, 13.7 billion years, stars, galaxies, the earth and clusters made of atoms and plasma formed. [History of the Universe: Chapter 26, Cosmology and Chapter 27,The Early Universe]
“One might wonder why, if humans have been able to create the technical conditions for nuclear fission, the Atomic Bomb, man’s destructive energy to occur, their technological prowess has not yielded the construction of technical devices that would produce nuclear fusion.” [Can Fusion Energy Be Achieved, thought Leader, by Bert Oliver, Nov 15, 2015] The formation for Deuterium is the hallmark of God’s Creation, because the extreme temperatures and conditions reveal that Creation is too high tech, precisely and instantly intended to be a random event. Deuterium creation is a controlled event and requires intervention, Intelligent Design.
Like the student in chemistry laboratory performing an experiment. After the chemicals are mixed in a beaker, the Bunsen burner must be controlled and turned down with a guiding hand to a very specific unusual temperature that cannot spontaneously happen on its own. “Controlled nuclear fusion is God’s Creation energy.” [Schroeder]
Without 1.2 billion degrees Kelvin temperature and ambient photon energy was 1.8 x 10-14 joules, from His interventional hand, Intelligent Design, repeated over and over again, all universe formation would fissile . Does anyone actually believe that Creation was magic and not scientific and that He is not a scientist as well as spiritual God?
Nuclear fission is the energy of man’s destruction i.e. the atomic bomb. “With wisdom God created the heavens and the earth.” “Controlled nuclear fusion was God’s first choice for energy.” Nuclear Fusion is the first step in the Creation process. [Gerald Schroeder, Ph.D., MIT in nuclear physics and earth science] “The sun is a titanic fusion reactor, constantly smooshing hydrogen nuclei together and sending us the by product in the form of sunlight.” All stars are not suns. “A star is called a ‘sun’ if it is the center of a planetary system.” [Ask An Astronomer, June 27, 2015]
A hypernova Big Bang explosion sparked our Universe formation.
Supernovae result from the explosion of a star with too much or too little energy. A larger Hypernova results from the explosion of a supermassive star or merger or collision of 2 massive black holes, a binary event. God operates with spiritual energy, spirituality.
His 4 Creation force field energies which are:
- 1. Gravitational
- 2. Electromagnetic
- 3. Strong nuclear
- 4. Weak nuclear
- Each force field has many subtypes [The Physics Hypertextbook, Glen Alert]
Nuclear fusion, Intelligent Design, aka nucleosynthesis, aka nucleogenesis, was the energy and temperature ignition which began God’s Universe Creation following the Hypernova Big Bang. Nuclear Fusion is the first step in the Creation process. Not all supernova and hypernova give rise to Creation.
Immediately after our Hypernova Big Bang explosion, approximately 13.8 billion years ago, God created the energy reactions that dropped the temperature of our universe to the very specific, critical Creation level. Immediately after the hypernova brief, fleeting periods evolved:
- first was the Planck period
- then at 10ˉ43 seconds elementary particles were formed
- 10ˉ35 sec came strong forces and the elementary particle
- 10ˉ10 sec began electromagnetic and weak forces
- 0.001 sec to 3 minutes was the nuclear fusion era with protons, neutrons electrons and neutrinos and nuclear fusion
- At our Universe’s age of 2 minutes, after the Big Bang Hypernova, the temperature cooled from the explosion to below 1.2 billion degrees Kelvin (2,159,999,540.3 °Fahrenheit). At this temperature, the average ambient photon energy was 1.8 x 10-14 joules, which was perfect binding energy of a deuterium nucleus (nuclear fusion, nucleosynthesis) . [Prof. Barbara Ryden(ryden@astronomy.ohio-state.edu) 2003 Mar 12]
- The exact temperature amd emergy for the nuclear fusion reaction, binding the first Deuterium nucleus (²H) in our Universe
- At 3 minutes nuclear fusion ceases and matter is 75% hydrogen.
- At 300,000 to 1 billion years atoms, plasma and stars begin to form
- 1 billion to present, 12.8 billion years, stars, galaxies and clusters made of atoms and plasma form
- [History of the Universe: Chapter 26, Cosmology and Chapter 27, The Early Universe]
Universe formation, scientists have concluded, is not a random event, but belongs to the “unusual assembly of events” that require the 1st step, Deuterium nuclear fusion, (Intelligent Design IMHSMO), God’s first choice of energy for Creation, providing an environment conducive to the emergence of all the complex successive Creations of particles, atoms, stars, planets and eventually to the Creation of humans with minds, in ‘His likeness’.
“One might wonder why, if humans have been able to create the technical conditions for nuclear fission to occur, their technological prowess has not yielded the construction of technical devices that would produce fusion.” [Can Fusion Energy Be Achieved, thought Leader, by Bert Oliver, Nov 15, 2015]
The problem is that “currently the process takes more energy to initiate and contain a man-made fusion reaction than the reaction then produces. [Nuclear Fusion : WNA". world-nuclear.org. November 2015] ["Fission and fusion can yield energy". Hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu. Retrieved 30 October 2014]
"Nonlocality occurs due to the phenomenon of entanglement, whereby particles that interact with each other become permanently correlated, or dependent on each other’s states and properties, to the extent that they effectively lose their individuality and in many ways behave as a single entity. The two concepts of nonlocality and entanglement go very much hand in hand, and, peculiar though they may be, they are facts of quantum systems which have been repeatedly demonstrated in laboratory experiments.
"Nonlocality is the phenomenon Albert Einstein rather dismissively called “spooky actions at a distance”. This was first described in the “EPR papers” of Einstein, Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen in 1935, and it is sometimes referred to as the EPR (Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen) paradox. It was even more starkly illustrated by Bell’s Theorem, published by John Bell in 1964, and the subsequent practical experiments by John Clauser and Stuart Freedman in 1972 and by Alain Aspect in 1982. [Non-Locality and Entanglement, The Physics of the Universe]
Well, I guess we know the answer......
- Human Life Creation from the top down begins with
- Deuterium Nucleosynthesis, from 2 to 20 minutes, after Big Bang, 13.8 Billion years ago
- continued then and continues now with compatable Evolution and Natural Selection
- and Quantum Entangled Non-Local Interconnectedness with strong, electromagnetic, weak and gravitational forces
- and from the bottom up, Quantum Entangled Electromagnetic and Vibrational DNA Creativity Signals.
- All Non-Local Interconnected components within our entire Universe signify an irreproducible, Higher Source, Intelligent Design, Our God.
When a youngster, this scientific investigator was taught traditional Methodist Religion. Nowadays, this journalist understands that traditional Religious, Spititual and Melditation teachings and practices are extremely important for the non-scientifically inclined, which equals approximately 85% of the U.S. population.
This journalist then was educated 11 years after high school in science and medicine, and has contnued medical and scientific education during his lifetime, which was and contnes to be the focus of this professional life, which continues to have a positive impact and influnence on his religious and spiritual philosophies.
The management and treatment of other Humans' injuries, sicknesses and deaths have been and continue to be realistically significant. Supernatural miracles, ghostly and mythological methods have had no place in this journalist's practice of medicine and decision making. Profesional and personal prayer to and worship of God are real adjunctive methods for everyday living and assests to the parctice of medicine, science and patient well being, because they directly impact families, doctors and patients' lives. The Human benefits from prayer to and worship of God are neuroanatomical, neurophysiological and moreso, from the Holy Spirit, not paranormal, metaphysical or miraculous.
This journalist, faced in early life with supernatural virgin birth and resurrection from the death and other literal biblical supernatural teachings, later in life different allegorical scientificaly proven biblical interpretations easily rectified the history of Jesus, which is a history perfectly reconcilled with Scientific Certainty Principles. Thereafter, SCIENTIFICALLY LITERATE CHRISTIANS Certainty and Doubtlessness Principles were found remarkable and very comforting.
