• Home
  • NEUROBIOPHYSICSOLOGY
  • INTELLIGENT DESIGN
  • GEO WHEELER WALDEN POND
  • MICROTUBULE MEMRISTORS
  • Gravitational Forces
  • Origin of Life
  • CHNOPS MOROWITZ ORGANISMS
  • SCIENTIFICALLY EDUCATED
  • SUPERSYMMETRY DARK MATTER
  • UNIVERSE IS A SYMPHONY
  • WHAT/WHY OF INFORMATION
  • Inquiring, Curious Mind
  • CORONAVIRUSES
  • PEDIATRIC COVID-19
  • IMMUNE TOLL AND CELLS
  • Human Brain Alarms
  • CYBERNETICS OF CREATION
  • EINSTEIN'S ZYTGLOGGE
  • CONSCIOUSNESS VIBRATIONS
  • TOM JEFFERSON AND DIDYMUS
  • HUMAN BRAIN EVENT HORIZON
  • NeuroBioPhysicsology
  • ST. ARBOGFAST CHURCH
  • How Do We Describe This ?
  • OUR HABITABLE UNIVERSE
  • DR HAMEROFF DESCRIBES GOD
  • AMAZING PENTATONIC GRACE
  • MEANING / PURPOSE OF LIFE
  • FINAL STAGE OF CREATION
  • RELIGIOUS HEALTH BENEFITS
  • BRAIN TESTS FOR RELIGION
  • THE HUMAN SOUL
  • SCIENTIFIC CEERTAINTY
  • BEAUTY IS AS BEAUTY DOES
  • SCIENTIST + SPIRITUAL GOD
  • MENTORS OF MBM SR MD FICS
  • DIVINE INTELLIGENT DESIGN
  • SCIENTIFICALLY LITERATE
  • JESUSISATION, JESUSNESS
  • CHRISTIANISATION
  • DEFINITIONS
  • WEBINARS
  • deJAYNE NEW HAVEN PURITAN
  • SURMOUNTING THE PRECIPICE
  • TRANSCRANIAL ULTRASOUND
  • WHEELER'S WALDEN POND
  • mbmsrmd WHEELER ANCESTRY
  • Walden Pond Is Sacred
  • MBMSRMD CURRICULUM VITAE
  • More
    • Home
    • NEUROBIOPHYSICSOLOGY
    • INTELLIGENT DESIGN
    • GEO WHEELER WALDEN POND
    • MICROTUBULE MEMRISTORS
    • Gravitational Forces
    • Origin of Life
    • CHNOPS MOROWITZ ORGANISMS
    • SCIENTIFICALLY EDUCATED
    • SUPERSYMMETRY DARK MATTER
    • UNIVERSE IS A SYMPHONY
    • WHAT/WHY OF INFORMATION
    • Inquiring, Curious Mind
    • CORONAVIRUSES
    • PEDIATRIC COVID-19
    • IMMUNE TOLL AND CELLS
    • Human Brain Alarms
    • CYBERNETICS OF CREATION
    • EINSTEIN'S ZYTGLOGGE
    • CONSCIOUSNESS VIBRATIONS
    • TOM JEFFERSON AND DIDYMUS
    • HUMAN BRAIN EVENT HORIZON
    • NeuroBioPhysicsology
    • ST. ARBOGFAST CHURCH
    • How Do We Describe This ?
    • OUR HABITABLE UNIVERSE
    • DR HAMEROFF DESCRIBES GOD
    • AMAZING PENTATONIC GRACE
    • MEANING / PURPOSE OF LIFE
    • FINAL STAGE OF CREATION
    • RELIGIOUS HEALTH BENEFITS
    • BRAIN TESTS FOR RELIGION
    • THE HUMAN SOUL
    • SCIENTIFIC CEERTAINTY
    • BEAUTY IS AS BEAUTY DOES
    • SCIENTIST + SPIRITUAL GOD
    • MENTORS OF MBM SR MD FICS
    • DIVINE INTELLIGENT DESIGN
    • SCIENTIFICALLY LITERATE
    • JESUSISATION, JESUSNESS
    • CHRISTIANISATION
    • DEFINITIONS
    • WEBINARS
    • deJAYNE NEW HAVEN PURITAN
    • SURMOUNTING THE PRECIPICE
    • TRANSCRANIAL ULTRASOUND
    • WHEELER'S WALDEN POND
    • mbmsrmd WHEELER ANCESTRY
    • Walden Pond Is Sacred
    • MBMSRMD CURRICULUM VITAE
  • Home
  • NEUROBIOPHYSICSOLOGY
  • INTELLIGENT DESIGN
  • GEO WHEELER WALDEN POND
  • MICROTUBULE MEMRISTORS
  • Gravitational Forces
  • Origin of Life
  • CHNOPS MOROWITZ ORGANISMS
  • SCIENTIFICALLY EDUCATED
  • SUPERSYMMETRY DARK MATTER
  • UNIVERSE IS A SYMPHONY
  • WHAT/WHY OF INFORMATION
  • Inquiring, Curious Mind
  • CORONAVIRUSES
  • PEDIATRIC COVID-19
  • IMMUNE TOLL AND CELLS
  • Human Brain Alarms
  • CYBERNETICS OF CREATION
  • EINSTEIN'S ZYTGLOGGE
  • CONSCIOUSNESS VIBRATIONS
  • TOM JEFFERSON AND DIDYMUS
  • HUMAN BRAIN EVENT HORIZON
  • NeuroBioPhysicsology
  • ST. ARBOGFAST CHURCH
  • How Do We Describe This ?
  • OUR HABITABLE UNIVERSE
  • DR HAMEROFF DESCRIBES GOD
  • AMAZING PENTATONIC GRACE
  • MEANING / PURPOSE OF LIFE
  • FINAL STAGE OF CREATION
  • RELIGIOUS HEALTH BENEFITS
  • BRAIN TESTS FOR RELIGION
  • THE HUMAN SOUL
  • SCIENTIFIC CEERTAINTY
  • BEAUTY IS AS BEAUTY DOES
  • SCIENTIST + SPIRITUAL GOD
  • MENTORS OF MBM SR MD FICS
  • DIVINE INTELLIGENT DESIGN
  • SCIENTIFICALLY LITERATE
  • JESUSISATION, JESUSNESS
  • CHRISTIANISATION
  • DEFINITIONS
  • WEBINARS
  • deJAYNE NEW HAVEN PURITAN
  • SURMOUNTING THE PRECIPICE
  • TRANSCRANIAL ULTRASOUND
  • WHEELER'S WALDEN POND
  • mbmsrmd WHEELER ANCESTRY
  • Walden Pond Is Sacred
  • MBMSRMD CURRICULUM VITAE
11thGGfather James Cole Rock 
Plymouth Colony 1633 1stsettler Cole's Hill 1st Pilgrim burial ground
Genealogy Wheel. Magnify  and Rotate for Details.
Throreau  Cabin is located on the 44 acres George Wheeler willed to John and Thomas Wheeler 1684
 George Wheeler Sr. family of Cranfield, Bedfordshire, England,
ST PETER AND ST PAUL, CRANFIELD, CENTRAL BEDFORDSHIRE UNITARY AUTHORITY, BEDFORDSHIRE, ENGLAND
Jesse Wheeler DAR Revolutionary War marker on hillside in  Concord Cemetery. Only evidence of 1805

Relatedness Calculator

  Relatedness Calculator: https://relatednesscalculator.nolanlawson.com/q=great+great+great+great+great+great+great+great+great+grandfather 


"A generation is a single step in the line of descent from an ancestor.  The coefficient of relationship is sometimes used to express degrees of kinship in numeric terms in human genealogy.


"In human relationships, the value of the coefficient of relationship is usually calculated based on the knowledge of a full family tree extending to a comparatively small number of generations, perhaps of the order of three or four. As explained above, the value for the coefficient of relationship so calculated is thus a lower bound, with an actual value that may be up to a few percent higher. The value is accurate to within 1% if the full family tree of both individuals is known to a depth of seven generations.[c] 

Lancaster, F. M. (October 2005). "Calculation of the Coefficient of Relationship". Genetic and Quantitative Aspects of Genealogy. Archived from the original on 2007-06-29. 


9th Great Grandfather George Wheeler Sr. 

Result for great great great great great great great great great grandfather (9th GGFather)
Relatedness coefficient: 0.049%

 Degree of relation: 11 generations back from mbmsrmd:

mbmsrmd > 1 generation Parent > 2 generation grandparent > 3 generation 1st great > 4 generation 2nd great > 5 generation 3rd great > 6 generation 4th great > 7 generation 5th great > 8 generation 6th great > 9 generation 7th great > 10 generation 8th great grandfather > 11 generation 9th great grandfather George Wheeler Sr


Relatedness coefficient: what percentage of human genes shared with another human.  Degree of relation: how far a human is from another person in the family tree. 9th Great-Grandfather George Wheeler Sr is 0.049% (distantly) related to mbmsrmd and 11 generations removed from mbmsrmd in the family tree, as closely related as all other humans.

==


"The odds that the chromosomes from one parent could come entirely from just one grandparent is 

1 in 4 million."


"Disease risk in many cases is a combination of both genes and environment and integrating information from both domains opens up many possibilities. Many phenotypic traits are complex results of myriad genes plus environment. So, the genomic context for the thick eyebrows may not have been present again until your generation


"Each generation we go back halves the amount of autosomal genome you receive, on average, from a particular ancestor. For example, on average 50% of your autosomal genome passed on from your mother comes from your maternal grandmother, 50% comes from your maternal grandfather. This material is inherited in large chunks, as chromosome fragments are inherited in large blocks between recombination events.


"Autosomal DNA is inherited equally from both parents. The amount of autosomal DNA inherited from more distant ancestors is randomly shuffled up in a process called recombination and the percentage of autosomal DNA coming from each ancestor is diluted with each new generation. 

[Which Grandparent Are You Most Related to, Your family tree says you inherited 25 percent of your ancestry from each. Genetics says you didn’t. BY RAZIB KHANOCT 18, 2013, Slate]  [  Bookman EB, McAllister K, Gillanders E, Wanke K, Balshaw D, Rutter J, Reedy J, Shaughnessy D, Agurs-Collins T, Paltoo D, Atienza A, Bierut L, Kraft P, Fallin MD, Perera F, Turkheimer E, Boardman J, Marazita ML, Rappaport SM, Boerwinkle E, Suomi SJ, Caporaso NE, Hertz-Picciotto I, Jacobson KC, Lowe WL, Goldman LR, Duggal P, Gunnar MR, Manolio TA, Green ED, Olster DH, Birnbaum LS; NIH GxE Interplay Workshop participants. Gene-environment interplay in common complex diseases: forging an integrative model—recommendations from an NIH workshop. Genet Epidemiol. 2011 May;35(4):217-25. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20571. PMID: 21308768; PMCID: PMC3228883]  [ 23andMe Customer Care]  [Autosomal DNA statistics From ISOGG Wiki]

Files coming soon.

9th Great Grandfather George Wheeler Sr. ANCESTRY

  George Wheeler Sr. was born 1606 in Cranfield, Bedford, England. His father was Thomas Wheeler. George Wheeler Sr. was an early settler of Concord, MA: His first record in Concord was his arrival 1635. [Ancestry.com]   


All England, Select Births and Christenings, 1538-1975 results for George Wheeler Ancestry.com

Name Baptism Date Baptism Place Relatives

George Wheler 23 Mar 1606  Cranfield, Bedford, England  father -Thomas [Ancestry.com]


U.S. and International Marriage Records, 1560-1900 results for George Wheeler [ Ancestry.com] 

Name Gender Birth Year Birth  Place  Marriage

George Wheeler  Male  1605  England  1630  Katherine Pin 

 

9th GGF GEORGE* 1- WHEELER [George married Katherine Pyn (Pin) 1630] 

Children in Roman Numeral order. Lineage in Counting Whole Numbers:

  • 2. I Thomas m. Hannah Harwood
  • 3. II William m. Hannah Buss
  • 4. III Ruth m. Samuel Hartwell
  • 5. IV Elizabeth m. Francis 2 Fletcher [
  • 6. V Hannah m. [Samuel] Fletcher 
  • 7. VI Sarah m. Francis Dudley 
  • 8. * VII 8th GGF John* m. Sarah Larkin
  • 9. VIII Mary m. Eliphalet Fox 
  • 8. *VII 8th GGF John* b. 19 March 1643 m. Sarah Larkin
  • 28. *VIII 7th GGF Ebenezer* b. 3 June 1682 m. Mary Minot
  • 80. *VI 6th GGF James* b. 7 April 1722 m. Abigail Ball 


Massachusetts, U.S., Town Birth Records, 1620-1850 [Ancestry.com]

  • 6th GGF James* Wheeler
  • Father: Ebenezer* Wheeler
  • Mother: Mary Minott
  • Birth: 7 Apr 1722


Ancestry.com legal records are accurate. George Wheler Baptism Date 23 Mar 1606, Cranfield, Bedford, England and Father was Thomas Wheler [Ancestry.com FHL Film Number: 845460]

ANCESTRY.COM. Ancestry® | Genealogy, Family Trees & Family History Records


Probably of all of the Wheelers who came to America before the year 1640 none was of greater distinction or of more importance to the town in which he lived than George Wheeler of Concord. 


His name appears on the Concord records the 1st year they were kept and every year thereafter till he died.  Thomas Wheeler was George Wheeler Sr.'s father.  He  bought most of the real estate left by the Rev. Peter Bulkeley.


George Wheeler Sr. came to Concord about the. year 1635 with  his wife Katherine Penn and several children. Walcott in his History of Concord asserts that he was one of the few men who " were foremost in the town's business, by virtue of their large estates as well as their integrity and good judgment." 


George Wheeler Sr.  was a man of education, and the owner of a large amount of property.  His house lot alone consisting of 11 acres, while he possessed lands in every part of the town, at Brook Meadows, Fairhaven Meadow, the Cranefield, by Walden Goose Pond, Flint's Pond, on the White Pond Plain, on the Sudbury line, etc. 


He held as many positions of trust and was as active in the direction of the town's affairs as any individual in Concord, serving at various times on substantially every committee of consequence, and leading in all matters of moment, as is evidenced by the fact that nearly every town deed and petition of any importance from either the Church or the civic community of that time bears his signature. 


His will, which is given here, is dated January 28, 1684 and was admitted to probate June 2, 1687', thus establishing the approximate time of his death. [DESCENDANTS OF GEORGE WHEELER OF CONCORD, MASS. 100. GEORGE WHEELER. , THE GENEALOGICAL AND ENCYCLOPEDIC HISTORY OF THE WHEELER FAMILY IN AMERICA COMPILED BY THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF GENEALOGY OP ALBERT GALLATIN WHEELER, JR. BOSTON, MASS. AMERICAN COLLEGE OF GENEALOGY 1914 COPYRIGHT, 1914 BY ALBERT G. WHEELER, JR]


** ==


George Wheeler was son of Sir Thomas 'The Elder' Wheeler, of Odell Cranfield:Born 11 Feb 1563 Cranfield, Central Bedfordshire Unitary Authority, Bedfordshire, EnglandDEATH 9 Feb 1634 (aged 70) Cranfield, Central Bedfordshire Unitary Authority, Bedfordshire, England and Burried St Peter and St Paul Churchyard Cranfield, Central Bedfordshire Unitary Authority, Bedfordshire, England MEMORIAL ID99951433 · Source:   Find a Grave, database and images (https://www.findagrave.com : accessed 06 March 2021), memorial page for Sir Thomas 'The Elder' Wheeler, of Odell Cranfield (11 Feb 1563–9 Feb 1634), Find a Grave Memorial no. 99951433, citing St Peter and St Paul Churchyard, Cranfield, Central Bedfordshire Unitary Authority, Bedfordshire, England ; Maintained by Anonymous (contributor 47882760) .  
Thomas Wheeler family Thomas WHEELER BIRTH: 1561, Odell, Cranfield, Bedfordshire, England CHRISTENING: 2 Mar 1565, Maulden, Bedfordshire, England DEATH: 11 Feb 1635, Cranfield, Bedfordshire, England BURIAL: 11 Feb 1635, Cranfield, Bedfordshire, England AFN: 8TX4-1L Father: John WHEELER Mother: Alice SAYRE Wife #1: Rebecca SAYRE 1572 - 3 May 1653 MARRIAGE: Abt 1588, of Cranfield, , England + Elizabeth WHEELER 18 Jul 1602 - 17 Mar 1690 Thomas WHEELER 20 Nov 1603 - Dead,  Timothy WHEELER 28 Dec 1604 - 30 Jul 1687,  George WHEELER 23 Mar 1606 - 2 Jun 1687,   Susanna WHEELER 16 Feb 1607 - 24 Mar 1649 John WHEELER 23 Oct 1608 - Aft 1627,   Joseph WHEELER 18 Feb 1610 - 22 Aug 1675-1676 Elizabeth WHEELER 27 Feb 1611 - ____,   Abiah WHEELER 17 Jan 1613 - 18 Apr 1637 Richard WHEELER 13 Jun 1614 - 10 Feb 1676,   Mary WHEELER 20 Oct 1615 - ____ Ephraim WHEELER 16 Mar 1619 - 1 Nov 1670,   Thomas WHEELER 8 Apr 1620 - 10 Dec 1676 [ancestry.com ] 

Sir Thomas Wheeler 

(Sir) Thomas Wheler b. 1465 in Cranfield, Bedfordshire, England d. May 27, 1456 at Wing, Buckinghamshire, England (81 years old) m. Joan Jane Buckingham(b. 1469 in Wing, Buckinghamshire, England). They were married in Cranfield, Bedfordshire, England in 1490. **This Thomas Wheeler was knighted by King Henry VII on June 16, 1487 for bravery at the battle of Stoke(Field) Simnel’s Rebellion. This was the last battle in the War of the Roses. The battle was a victory for Henry's army. To signify his victory Henry raised his standard on Burham Furlong. The spot is marked by a large stone memorial with the legend "Here stood the Burrand Bush planted on the spot where Henry VII placed his standard after the Battle of Stoke 16 June 1487".[9] Henry knighted many of his supporters in the aftermath of the battle. A handwritten list of the new knights by John Writhe survives inserted into a copy of the book Game and Play of Chess.[10] Thirteen new bannerets were created and fifty two men were knighted. Thomas Wheler then changed the family name to Wheeler after being Knighted. Sources: Ancestral Wheeler Family of Cranfield, Bedfordshire, England, Whose Descendants Settled in Colonial New England. Raymond David Wheeler Publication: Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 94-78109 

The will of Thomas Wheeler “the elder” of Cranfield, co. Bedford, England, was dated 20 Dec. 1627. A codicil was added on 18 June 1633, and they were proved 24 Feb. 1634, by the Archdeaconry Court of Bedford, Register 18, folio 80.
Thomas Wheeler's Will This will is dated 7 December 1627 and is on file at County Records Office, County Hall, Birmingham, Bedford, England, MK42 9AP:In the name of God amen. the seaventh day of december in the yeare of our lord god one thousand Sixe hundred Twenty and Seaven I Thomas Wheler sen of Cranfield in the County of Bedf. yeoman weake in bodie but of good and pfecte remembrance Gods holie name be praised doe make and ordayne this my last will and testament in manner and forme followinge That is to say ffirst I give and bequeath my soule unto allmightie god my Creator hoping assuredly through the merittes of Jesus Christ to be made ptaker of life everlastinge And my bodie to the Earth whereof it is made Item - I give and bequeath unto Rebecca my wife [for and during the terme of her life if she keepe herself a widow] all that Capitall messuage or tenement with the apptenances lying and being in the Towne end of Cranfield aforesaid wch I lately purchased of John Vause Esquire And after the decease of the said Rebecca my wife or day of her marriage with any person whatsoever I give and bequeath the said Capitol messuage or tenements with all houses edifices buildings yards and gardens grounds commons pfitts and apptenances thereto belonging to Joseph Wheler my sonne and his heirs for ever upon theese condicons followings viz - that he the said Joseph my sonne shall well and truly pay or cause to be payd out of my said messuage and pmisses the full sume of Thirtye pounds of lawfull money of England to my executor or executrix hereafter named or to such other pson or psons as my said executor or executrix shall nominate and appoynte of of debts where I owe - And also pay or cause to be payd out of my said Messuage with the apputenances unto Thomas Wheler my youngest son the full sume of Twenty pounds of lawfull money of England wch sumes of Thirty pounds and twenty pounds are to be payd by the said Joseph when he cometh to the full age of one and twenty years within one yeare after my decease - And for the better payment of the said sumes by him the said Joseph I have surrendered to his use Twelve acres of Coppie hold land Provided allwaies and my will and minde absolutly is that if the said Joseph my sonne or his assigns doe not pay the said sumes of Thirty and twenty pounds in such manner and forme at such dayes and to such pson or psons as afore is expressed then the gift and bequest of the said Messuage or tenement with the apptenances shalbe voyd and of none effect to all intents and purposes whatsoever And I give and bequeath the said Messuage wth the appetenances commons and pfitts whatsoever to the said Thomas Wheler my youngest sonne and his heirs for ever and for default of such issue the remaynder thereof to Efraim Wheler my sonne and his heirs for ever aniething herein to the contrarie hereof in anie wise notwithstanding - Item I give and bequeath to Thomas Wheler of Warley my eldest sonne the sume of Twelve pence- Item I give to Prisila Cockes my daughter twelve pence- Item I give to John Wheler my sonne twelve pence- Item I give to Elizabeth Broad my daughter twelve pence- Item I give to Suzana Wheler my daughter one ewe lamb a table and fframe standinge in the plor at Borne end house- Item I give to Abiah Wheler my daughter one whyte weanings calfe and Two table clootes- Item I give to Marie Wheler my daughter one standingse bedsted and Two Table Clootes- Item I give to the said Joseph my sonne one fframe scovell standing in the yard at my messuage at the towne end the old carte and ould wheels and a dung carte- Item I give to the said Efraim Wheler my sonne one frame scovell at the ould Barne end ffower principall postes for a house And all the longe timber under the little scovelles in the close yard at Borne end and one weaning calfe- And my will is that Thomas Tomkins shall lawfully convey and assure That ffrehold I bought of him to the said Efraim my sonne and his heires for ever- Item I give to the said Thomas Wheler my youngest son one pott one Tegg and ffive pounds of lawful money of England to be payd him by my executor and executrix at the age of 24 years- Item I give to Allin Broad my sonne in law one carte Bodie lying behind the stoles in the ould barn and 2 broad ristes- Item I give and bequeath to the said Rebecca my wife all my movable goodes wthin my two dwelling houses at Borne end and the towne end [unbequeathed] and two heffers the one a red the other a little browne one and one ewe sheepe - And also my will in that Timothie Wheler my sonne shall have halfe of my messuage closes lands and meadows at Borne end aforesaid and half the benefitt and pfitt thereof for three yeares next after my decease [for an ease or helpe towards the payment of my debts] - All the rest of my goods and cattelles as well reales as psonales unbequeathed I give and bequeath to the said Timothie my sonne whome I make my full and sole executor of this my last will and testament. And if he the said Timothie refuse to be executor of this my will then I make Rebecka my wife executrix of this my last will and I doe hereby utterly revoke and annull in deed and in law all former wills testamentes legaces bequests and executors by me formely made - And lastly my will is that the legacy of xx pounds shall be payd by the said Joseph to the said Thomas my youngest sonne out of my said messuage with the appurtenances when he cometh to the age of xxi yearsIn witness whereof I the said Thomas Wheler the elder have to this my last will and testament sett my hand and seale the day and yeare first above writ signed Thomas Wheler the eldertracing of his autograph from 1627 willTAG XIV p1 - July 1937Postscript the 18 daie of June 1633Itm I give and bequeath unto Efraim Wheeler my sonne one little pshtle late Tomas Tomkins containing one rood and halfe with the appurtenances to the heires and assignes of the said Efraim for ever signed Thomas Wheler the eldersigned and delivered in the psence of Tho: Arnald, Richard Arnald, Thomas Baker. No inventory. Probate 24 Feb 1634 granted to the executors named at the Archdeaconry Court of Bedford.from the Trevor-Wingfield Collection: Roll of Arrears of payment of Ship-Money 1637, County of Bedford, Parish of Cranfield: "Thomas Wheeler gone into New England 01-05-00."sources: The American Genealogist vol 14 #1 July 1937 p1-4 by Jacobus "The Father of the Concord Wheelers.""The Wheeler Family of Cranfield England and Coccord, Massachusetts and some Descendents of Sgt. Thomas Wheeler of Concord" by M. Wheeler Molyneaux [ancestry.com]

ANCESTORS 


Sir Henry Own Wheeler, Baron of Cranfield

Also Known As:"Wheler"Birthdate:1433Birthplace:Cranfield, Bedfordshire, England (United Kingdom)Death:1470 (36-37) Cranfield, Bedfordshire, England (United Kingdom)Immediate Family:

Son of Henry Wheler and Joan WhelerHusband of Mary Elizabeth WheelerFather of Richard Wheeler; John Wheeler; Sir Thomas Wheeler, Knight; John Wheler and Richard WhelerBrother of John Wheler and Richard WhelerOccupation: Baron of Cranfield
 

Sir Thomas Wheeler (Wheler), Knight

Also Known As:"Sir Thomas Wheeler"Birthdate:circa 1465 Birthplace:Cranfield, Bedford, EnglandDeath:May 27, 1546 (76-85) Wing, Buckinghamshire, England, Immediate Family:Son of Sir Henry Own Wheeler, Baron of Cranfield and Mary Elizabeth WheelerHusband of Joan WheelerFather of Edward Wheeler; William Wheeler; Alice Stubley; Henry Wheeler, of Cranfield; John Wheeler, of Wing and 5 othersBrother of Richard Wheeler; John Wheeler; John Wheler and Richard Wheler
 

Henry Wheeler, of Cranfield MP

Birth: circa 1503 Cranfield, Bedfordshire, England (United Kingdom) Death: before March 17, 1557 Cranfield, Bedfordshire, England Son of Sir Thomas Wheeler, Knight and Joan WheelerHusband of 1st wife of Henry Wheeler and Isabel AllenFather of Thomas Wheeler, of Cranfield; William Wheeler; Joan Baker; John Wheeler, of Cranfield; Cranfield Wheeler and 3 others Brother of Edward Wheeler; William Wheeler; Alice Stubley; John Wheeler, of Wing; Richard Wheeler and 4 others

Thomas Wheeler, of Cranfield

Birthdate:circa 1526Birthplace:Cranfield, Central Bedfordshire, EnglandDeath:after 1574 Cranfield, Central Bedfordshire, EnglandImmediate Family:Son of Henry Wheeler, of Cranfield and 1st wife of Henry WheelerHusband of NN WheelerFather of John "of East Inn" Wheeler and Thomas "of The Town and Wharley End" WheelerBrother of William Wheeler; Joan Baker; John Wheeler, of Cranfield; Cranfield Wheeler; Henry Wheeler and 2 others
 

Thomas "of The Town and Wharley End" Wheeler

Also Known As:"Thomas of The Town & Wharley End"Birthdate:circa 1571Birthplace:Town End, Cranfield, Bedford, EnglandDeath:October 02, 1643 (67-76) Town End, Cranford, Bedfordshire, EnglandImmediate Family:Son of Thomas Wheeler, of Cranfield and NN WheelerHusband of Elizabeth Wheeler; Dorothy Wheeler and Jane WheelerFather of Thomas Wheeler, of Stonington;
 

St Peter and St Paul Churchyard Memorials, Cranfield, Central Bedfordshire Unitary Authority, Bedfordshire, England

  • Wheeler
  • Refine Search

 Less Sort by  Relevance Name (A-Z) Name (Z-A) Birth Date (Older) Birth Date (Newer) Death Date (Older) Death Date (Newer) Cemetery (A-Z) Cemetery (Z-A) Sort: Recently Added No grave photo

Alyce Sayer WheelerSPONSORED 

1529 – 15 Apr 1567No grave photo

Elizabeth Wheeler 

1510 – 15 Apr 1567No grave photo

Elizabeth Bread WheelerSPONSORED 

1565 – 24 Jan 1644No grave photo

Henry WheelerSPONSORED 

1503 – 17 Mar 1557No grave photo

John “"of the farm"” WheelerSPONSORED 

1563 – 2 Dec 1643No grave photo

John WheelerSPONSORED 

1533 – 15 Apr 1567No grave photo

Leonard Frank “Bob” Wheeler

12 Jan 1891 – 4 Mar 1955No grave photo

Rebecca WheelerSPONSORED 

1565 – 3 May 1653No grave photo

Thomas Wheeler 

1491 – 17 Dec 1555No grave photo

William Wheeler 

19 Apr 1607 – 17 Mar 1668No grave photo

Sir Thomas 'The Elder' Wheeler, of Odell CranfieldSPONSORED 

11 Feb 1563 – 9 Feb 1634
George Wheeler, of Town End & Concord, Massachucetts  
Richard Wheeler, of Dedham; Mary Wheeler; Elizabeth Watson and 1 otherBrother of John "of East Inn" WheelerHalf brother of Henry Wheeler; Isabel Wheeler and George Wheeler 


** ==

Old Hill Burying Ground, Monument Sq and Lexington Rd Concord, Middlesex County, Massachusetts, 01742 USA  

📷 After Concord was incorporated as a town in the fall of 1635, one of the first official acts of its original settlers, along with building a meetinghouse, was the establishment of two small burying grounds. This one, which came to be known as the "Hill Burying Ground" or "Hill Burying Place", was laid out near the northwest end of the long gravel ridge that sheltered the rude houses of the first settlers when they first came to Concord. At its east end, the first small meetinghouse was built, probably near the top of the hill. The other burying ground, the South Burying Place, was an even smaller plot of 1/2 acre on the south side of the Mill Brook.  

For many years, all burials are said to have been done here on the hill. According to one tradition, the very first area used was actually to the east of the present bounds, although no trace of it has been found. In any case, the earliest graves were either unmarked, or had wooden or simple stone markers that have since disappeared. The earliest marked grave here is that of Joseph Meriam, who died in 1677 at age 47  The cemetery sits on 1.16 acres. There are approximately 500 headstones with the earliest (marked) death date of 1677, the latest is 1854.  The Massachusetts Historical Commission refers to this cemetery in MACRIS as CON.804 Old Hill Burying Ground.  This cemetery is referred to as GR1 in the "Vital Records of Concord Massachusetts to the end of the year 1850."  Note: The entrance for this cemetery is from Monument Square through the gate between Holy Family Parish and the "brick-end" house.

Benjamin Wheeler 

13 Aug 1709 – 21 Sep 1777

📷

Daniel Wheeler

24 Apr 1766 – 7 Nov 1810No grave photo

Capt David Wheeler 

22 Jul 1730 – 10 Nov 1803

📷

Deacon David Wheeler 

26 Dec 1707 – 24 Mar 1784No grave photo

Ebenezer Wheeler 

3 Jun 1682 – 26 Feb 1748

📷

Frances Wheeler Jr. 

31 Jul 1728 – 25 Jun 1778

📷

No grave photo

George WheelerSPONSORED 

23 Mar 1605 – 1 Jun 1687No grave photo

Hannah Fletcher Wheeler 

24 Oct 1674 – 18 Sep 1752No grave photo

Jane Wheeler 

unknown – 12 Dec 1643

📷

Jesse Wheeler 

27 Oct 1762 – 16 Mar 1811

📷

Jonas Wheeler 

19 Jun 1699 – 30 Aug 1716No grave photo

Joseph Wheeler 

1610 – 1681

📷

No grave photo

Katherine Penn Wheeler SPONSORED 

25 Feb 1609 – 2 Nov 1685

📷

Kezia Wheeler

29 Sep 1780 – 29 Dec 1782

📷

Lucy Hastings Wheeler 

4 Oct 1726 – 28 Dec 1767No grave photo

Mary Wheeler

1720 – 30 Oct 1750No grave photo

Mary Brooks Wheeler 

1612 – 4 Oct 1693

📷

Mary Minott Wheeler 

16 Nov 1689 – 3 Sep 1760No grave photo

Mary Wheeler

1658 – 26 May 1668No grave photo

Peter Wheeler

1755 – 14 May 1813Page 2

📷

Rebecca Lee Wheeler

31 Oct 1715 – 12 Apr 1752

📷

Rebekah L. Wheeler 

5 Jun 1781 – 22 Mar 1798No grave photo

Ruth Wood Wheeler 

1615 – unknown

📷

Sally Wheeler

1775 – 2 Oct 1797

📷

Samuel Wheeler

6 May 1790 – 30 Aug 1802

📷

Sarah Wheeler 

27 Aug 1767 – 4 Sep 1775No grave photo

Sarah Merriam Wheeler 

1627 – 1 Feb 1677No grave photo

Sarah Goldstone Wheeler 

1602 – 12 Mar 1671

📷

Sarah Fletcher Wheeler 

24 Feb 1669 – 23 Sep 1744

📷

Capt Thomas Wheeler Jr. 

8 Apr 1620 – 10 Dec 1676No grave photo

Sgt Thomas Wheeler 

8 Feb 1621 – 24 Dec 1704No grave photo

Timothy Wheeler

unknown – 7 Apr 1678

📷

Timothy Wheeler 

24 Jul 1667 – 14 Apr 1718

📷

Capt Timothy WheelerSPONSORED 

1601 – 30 Jul 1687No grave photo

William Wheeler

1795 – 1 Sep 1818

📷

Ens William Wheeler 

8 Feb 1665 – 29 May 1752 




Files coming soon.

CONCORD WHEELER ANCESTORS' AND GREAT-GRANDFATHERS

"The story of Johnson County, Kentucky’s oldest active religious congregation and the Community of Churches in Johnson County, Kentucky  began with the history of Concord and Massachusetts Bay Colony (1620-1633), the ‘Early Planters’ in the Colony of New Haven Connecticut and Connecticut Colony in 1637 to 1638 and Setauket Farming Village, Brookhaven, Long Island, New York. 

  • [Reference: HISTORY of THE COLONY OF NEW HAVEN To its absorption into CONNECTICUT by Edward E. Atwater with Supplementary History and Personnel of the Towns of Branford, Guilford, Milford, Stratford, Norwalk, Southold, etc. compiled by Robert Atwater Smith assisted by Bessie E. Beach and Lucy M. Hewitt Meriden, Conn. The Journal Publishing Company 1902]
  • [reference: The Wheeler Families of Old Concord, Massachusetts, Late 19th century photograph of Scotchford-Wheeler House, Sudbury Road, Concord, photographed by Alfred W. Hosmer, Not to be reproduced without permission from the Concord Free Public Library, Compiled by George Tolman in 1908, Revised for editions of 1970 and 1981 and, by Joseph C. Wheeler, for this online edition of 2006., This online edition is complete up to the Joseph's revision, 12 October 2016., Questions or comments regarding the content of this genealogy should be addressed to Joseph C. Wheeler., c2006-c2016 Concord Free Public Library, Concord, Mass., Not to be reproduced in any form without permission of the Curator of Special Collections, Concord Free Public Library]
  • [ The Wheeler Families of Old Concord, Massachusetts  https://concordlibrary.org/special-collections/wheeler-genealogy]

Wheeler Power in Old Concord, [March 18, 2018 by Brenda J. Elliott, New England Roots,   Great Migration Directory for dates of emigration, if known. A History of the Town of Concord, Massachusetts]
"The stories of two, three, four, and even five brothers who left the Old World and came together to settle in the New World are legend. But the Wheeler family of Cranfield, Bedfordshire, England were the most numerous, apparently. The adult children of Thomas Wheeler, and his second wife, Rebecca [Sayre]  alone were 6 sons and 2 daughters i.e. Timothy, George, Susannah, Joseph, Elizabeth, Richard, Ephraim, and Thomas. Some left their homes in Cranfield between 1635 and 1640 with spouses and some with children. The majority of them settled in Concord, Middlesex, Massachusetts.
Those Wheelers were a very powerful community of Wheelers, which multiplied more abundantly than any other immigrant family that settled in Concord.

  • Richard Wheeler emigrated in 1635, a passenger on the Thomas as “Ricr Wheeler.” He was baptized June 13, 1614, in Cranfield, and died February 10, 1676, in Lancaster, Worcester, Massachusetts. He reportedly was the “victim of a massacre.” Richard married first, May 4, 1644, in Dedham, Norfolk, Massachusetts, Elizabeth Turner, and second, August 2, 1658, in Lancaster, Sarah Presscott.
  • Capt. Thomas Wheeler emigrated in 1635 as a passenger of the James of London. He was baptized April 9, 1620, in Cranfield, and died March 4, 1686, in Concord. Thomas married October 10, 1657, in Concord, Hannah Harrod (Harwood). Thomas came as a servant to August Clement. He was first at Salem, Essex, Massachusetts, and moved next to Lynn.
  • Sgt. Ephraim Wheeler emigrated in 1638. He was baptized March 16, 1619, in Cranfield, and died November 11, 1670, in Concord. He married Ann Turner in 1641 in Concord.
  • Elizabeth Wheeler emigrated in 1638 with her husband and two children. She was baptized July 18, 1602, in Cranfield, and died before 1656 in Lynn, Essex, Massachusetts. Elizabeth married Allen Breed of Pulloxhill, Bedfordshire, on November 14, 1622.
  • Capt. Timothy Wheeler emigrated in 1639. He was baptized December 28, 1604, in Cranfield, and died July 30, 1687, aged 86, in Concord. Timothy married three times. He married his first and second wives in Cranfield: Susan Knight, April 30, 1632, and Jane (?) in 1633. Following Jane’s death February, 12, 1642, in Concord, he married third Mary Brooks, daughter of Thomas and Grace Brooks, also founders of Concord.
  • George Wheeler emigrated in 1635. He was baptized March 25, 1606, in Cranfield, and died about June 2, 1687, in Concord. He married Katherine Penn on June 8, 1630, in Cranfield. Katherine’s parents, Henry Penn and Katherine Hull, both emigrated and died in Concord. At least three of George’s eight children were born in England and emigrated with their parents.
  • Lt. Joseph Wheeler emigrated in 1639. He was baptized February 18, 1610, in Cranfield, and died about 1681 in Concord. His wife was Sarah.
  • Susannah Wheeler emigrated in 1640. She was baptized May 31, 1607, in Cranfield, and died March 24, 1649, in Concord. She married Obadiah Wheeler, son of John Wheeler and Elizabeth Breed. It is most likely Susannah and Obadiah married in England. He died October 27, 1671, in Concord."

[The Wheeler Families of Old Concord,  Concord Free Public Library, Concord, Massachusetts,  Compiled by George Tolman in 1908 Revised for editions of 1970 and 1981 and, by Joseph C. Wheeler, for this online edition of 2006. This online edition is complete up to the Joseph's revision, 12 October 2016.]  Contents:1. The George Wheeler Line        1 - 6922. The Obadiah Wheeler Line        1001-11593. The Lieutenant Joseph Wheeler Line        2701 - 27054. The Captain Thomas Wheeler Line       2801 - 28235. The Captain Timothy Wheeler Line        2901 - 29056. The Sergeant Thomas Wheeler Line        3001 - 32427. Probable English Ancestry of the Concord WheelersSome of the relationships among these lines are discussed under # 2901 as well as in Section 7.--Top--The George Wheeler LineGEORGE 1 WHEELER m. KATHERINE PYNGeorge Wheeler was an early settler of Concord: The first record found of his name is in 1635. He appears to have been a person of some influence, and his name appears often on town records. He was selectman in 1660. His house lot of 11 acres was at the (present) corner of Main and Walden Streets, and in conjunction with Capt. Timothy Wheeler, who I think was very probably his nephew, he owned a large amount of land in the center of the town. He had also land near the “frog-ponds” and at Walden Pond, and at Nut Meadow Brook. His death is not recorded but his will was dated January 28, 1684/5 and presented for probate June 2, 1687. (Suffolk Prob. Reg. Vol. X fol. 1) His sons Thomas and John were named executors, but the former had died between the above dates and John was named sole executor. The will names “the children of my son William deceased, sons Thomas and John, daughters Elizabeth Fletcher, Sarah Dudley, Ruth Hartwell and Hannah Fletcher, and the children of my daughter ‘Fox' “. His age is not known, but as he had a son married in 1657, and as the birth of the youngest of his eight children occurred in 1645, it is probable that he was born between 1600 and 1610. I think it probable that he was a brother of Obadiah.[George married Katherine Pyn 9 Dec.1631 -- RRW] Katherine d. 2 Jan. 1684/5. According to a letter from Lexington genealogist Winifred Lovering Holman dated 21 June 1945, George Wheeler married first, 12 May 1645, Mary Studd.]
George Wheeler's children by Katherine, as shown by his will and by the Town records were:

  • 2.   I Thomas 2  m. Hannah Harwood
  • 3. II William 2   [b. 1633 – AY] m. Hannah Buss
  • 4.    III Ruth m. Samuel Hartwell
  • 5.    IV Elizabeth m. Francis 2 Fletcher [b. 1636 in Concord. They married 1 Aug. 1656. On April 15 1682, their son Samuel 3 Fletcher, who was born 6 Aug. 1657 and died 23 Oct. 1741, married another Elizabeth 2 Wheeler -- #3008. She was born 23 Feb. 1664. Samuel 3 Fletcher was a Corporal under Capt. Timothy Wheeler (#2901) and fought in King Philip's War. He was a Selectman 1705-7. – JCW]
  • 6.    V Hannah  m. [Samuel] Fletcher [son of William, son of Robert - RRW] [Note: Births, Marriages and Deaths has “Hanna Wheler” marrying Samewell (Samuel) Smedly 11 July 1667 and “ffrancies ffletcher” marrying Elizabeth Wheeler 11 Oct. 1656. See also note under # 5 – JCW]
  • 7.    VI Sarah   b. 30 March 1640  m. Francis Dudley [They married 26 Oct. 1665. Their son Joseph Dudley married Abigail Goble in Concord 25 Feb. 1689/90. She was the daughter of Thomas Goble (Gobill). Joseph and Abigail's son Benjamin Dudley was born in Concord 20 March 1698/9 and married Elizabeth Rice of Sudbury. Then their son Joseph Dudley married Mary Warren of Westborough in 1732 -- JCW]
  • 8.    VII John 2    b. 19 March 1643  m. Sarah Larkin
  • 9.    VIII Mary    b. 6 Sept. 1645  m. Eliphalet 2 Fox [They married 26 Oct. 1665. He was the son of Thomas and Rebecca Fox. Eliphlet and Mary Wheeler Fox' daughter Mary married Peter Harwood – JCW]

"Its worth noting that the Wheelers of Cranfield were following Peter Bulkley, who was a well known Puritan minister from Bedfordshire.  Bulkley was a founder of Concord,[1] which Buckley called "Concord" in appreciation of its peacefulness. Peter Bulkley was referenced by descendant Ralph Waldo Emerson in his poem about Concord, Hamatreya.[2] .   Bulkley followed in his father's footsteps as a non-conformist. 

  1. Frank Preston Stearns (1896). Sketches from Concord and Appledore. G. P. Putnam's Sons.
  2. Ralph Waldo Emerson. "Hamatreya". American Transcendalism Web. 

Peter Bulkley was unwilling to conform with the requirements of the Anglican Church, he believed was leaning too much toward Catholicism.  In 1633, Charles I reissued the Declaration of Sports, an ecclesiastical declaration of allowed recreational activities on Sundays, with the stipulation that any minister unwilling to read from the pulpit should be removed, and Bulkley's sentiments, along with others in the Puritan movement, were against it. In 1634, Bulkley refused to wear a surplice or use the Sign of the Cross at a visitation for Archbishop William Laud. For this infraction he was ejected from the parish.[6][7

  • 6. Marcus Bourne Huish (1907). The American Pilgrim's Way in England. London Fine Art Society.
  • 7. Huish notes that Laud himself may not have been present, but rather his Vicar-General, Nathaniel Brent.

Peter Bulkley oldest son, Edward, preceded him to the Colonies on a separate voyage as much as a year earlier, while records show that Rev. Peter sailed on the ship "Susan & Ellen" to New England in May 1635, with three of his sons by his first wife, Benjamin* (11), Daniel (9) and "Jo:" (15) "Buckley".
Records show his second wife, Grace Bulkley, sailed  and accompanied her husband on the ship "Susan & Ellen" to New England. [*Note: the name "Benjamin" appears to be an alias used for one of his sons, since no primary source records exist of Benjamin's birth or subsequent activities in the Colonies.]His son, Gershom, graduated Harvard in 1655 and married Sarah Chauncey, daughter of the president of Harvard, October 26, 1659.[14]:78 His grandson, the Honorable Peter Bulkley, Esquire (son of Edward), born 3 January (11th month) 1640/41, died May 1688, married Rebecca Wheeler in 1667, was a Fellow of Harvard University, a Massachusetts Freeman (franchised voter), and a Commissioner of the United Colonies. The Hon. Peter Bulkley is often confused with his uncle, the Rev. Peter (1643-1691), son of Rev. Peter Bulkley by his second wife, Grace Chetwode, due to their close proximity in years of birth. As a matter of fact, the reference by Sibley has "merged" these two Peters into one entity, as examination of records, including those at Harvard University, will show.[13] 

  • 11. Lemuel Shattock (1835). A History of the town of Concord. Boston: Russell, Odiorne, and Company.
  • 12. Arthur Bernon Tourtellot, Lexington and Concord: The Beginning of the War of the American Revolution, 1959, "[1]", January 11, 2011.
  • 13. John Langdon Sibley (1881). Biographical Sketches of Graduates of Harvard University. Charles William Sever.
  • 14. Chapman, F.W. The Bulkley Family; or the Descendants of Rev. Peter Bulkley, who settled at Concord, Mass., in 1636, 1875.
  • [Wikipedia]

Albert Gallatin Wheeler, in his Wheeler history, wrote that in 1640, Wheeler was the most common surname in all of America. Given your list from the Concord birth records, maybe its true. Remember, there were only 26,000 Europeans in America in 1640. [William Wheeler says: I’m a descendant of George Wheeler, July 23, 2018]

  • #1 George Wheeler in line of our Descent to our Grandfather Charles Wesley Wheeler is aka our 9th Great-Grandfather in Ascent from Grandfather Charles Wesley Wheeler 
  • → #2 / 8th Great-Grandfather John Wheeler → #3 Ebenezer Wheeler 
  • → #4 James Wheeler is 4th Descendant form #1 George Wheeler and 6th Great-Grandfather Ascendant from Grandfather Charles Wesley Wheeler 
  • → #5 Jesse Wheeler Descendant form #1 George Wheeler → #6 Stephen Wheeler 
  • → # 7 Reverend William Wheeler → #8 Stephen Wheeler 
  • → #9 Henry Clay Wheeler is #9 Descendant from #1 George Wheeler to Grandfather Charles Wesley Wheeler and 1st Great-Grandfather from ← Grandfather Charles Wesley Wheeler

The Wheeler line of descent ended with 6th Great-Grandfather James Wheeler down to Grandfather Charles Wesley Wheeler on the Genealogy Chart my Mother prepared. I copied the Wheeler Genealogy Chart for some of our Wheeler Cousins. Please ask you cousins for a a Wheeler Genealogy Chart and fill in the blanks with our Wheeler Great-Grandparents.
2 James Wheeler migrated to Southern Virginia, This James Wheeler from Concord and Massaachuetts Bay Colony that migrated into Kentucky was naturally the correct James Wheeler; not the James Wheeler who served in the Revolutionary War and migrated into North Carolina.
From Concord Massachusetts and adjacent Puritan Colonies in 1600's to Concord, KY, Great Grandfather (GGF) Ancestors, several ministers, William Jayne, Jesse and Stephen Wheeler, and many other GGF, who descended form Colonial New England, beginning 'British America Colonies' around Concord Massachusetts, New Haven Connecticut and Setauket farming village in Brookhaven, Long Island, NY and John Ramey (Jacob Remy French Huguenot), and families settled at and named their first settlement Concord on the Big Sandy River across from the Buffalo Shoal near present Paintsville, Ky in 1805 and organized their small but significant Concord Baptist Church, Propagating Protestantism, on the Concord Wheeler property was paramount. The congregation grew and "the Old Union Church was born."
Again, please note that our Wheeler ancestors named the settlement Concord and the church, the ‘Concord Church’, because our Wheeler family descended for the Wheeler Family of Concord and Massachusetts Bay Colonies and the Wheelers of Cranfield were following well known Puritan minister from Bedfordshire Peter Bulkley,.  Bulkley was a founder of Concord,[1] and was named by descendant Ralph Waldo Emerson in his poem about Concord, Hamatreya.[2] .   Bulkley followed in his father's footsteps as a non-conformist.
9th Great-Grandfather George Wheeler 1 was born in 1605 in England. He married Catherine Penn.9th Great-Grandfather # 1 GEORGE WHEELER married KATHERINE PENN. #1 George Wheeler was born on March 25 1605, in Hinwich, Cranfield, Bedfordshire, England. His occupations were Businessman and Property Owner.
#1 GEORGE  WHEELER and KATHERINE PENN had 13 children:The following are 9th Great-Grandfather #1 George Wheeler descendants to Grandfather Charles Wesley Wheeler:

  • #1 George Wheeler in line of our Descent to our Grandfather Charles Wesley Wheeler is aka our 9th Great-Grandfather in Ascent from Grandfather Charles Wesley Wheeler 
  • → #2 / 8th Great-Grandfather John Wheeler → #3 Ebenezer Wheeler 
  • → #4 James Wheeler is 4th Descendant form #1 George Wheeler and 6th Great-Grandfather Ascendant from Grandfather Charles Wesley Wheeler 
  • → #5 Jesse Wheeler Descendant form #1 George Wheeler → #6 Stephen Wheeler 
  • → # 7 Reverend William Wheeler → #8 Stephen Wheeler 
  • → #9 Henry Clay Wheeler is #9 Descendant from #1 George Wheeler to Grandfather Charles Wesley Wheeler and 1st Great-Grandfather from ← Grandfather Charles Wesley Wheeler

#1 George Wheeler wife KATHERINE PENN Parents:10th Great-Grandfather Henry Penn and 10th Great Grandmother Catherine Hull Penn. Katherine Penn Wheeler was born in 1610 died 1684 [MyHeritage]   10th Great-Grandparents Henry Penn and Catherine Hull Penn:  Henry Penn was born in 1583, in Cranfield, Bedfordshire, England. Catherine was born on March 1, 1592, in Kirkham, Lancashire, England.
#1 George Wheeler wife, Katherine, was baptized on month day 1610, at baptism place. She had one sister: Mary Studd.Katherine married #1 George Wheeler of Wharley End in 1630, at age 21.
#1 George Wheeler  was born on March 25 1605, in Hinwich, Cranfield, Bedfordshire, England.His occupations in Concord Massachusetts, were Businessman/Property Owner and Businessman, Property Owner. They had 13 children:
PENN, Henry, Born 1583  Cranfield, Bedfordshire, England Died 1630  Concord, Middlesex County, Massachusetts, USA
# 2 John Wheeler son George #1  was b. 19 March 1643 married Sarah Larkin 8th Great-Grandfather JOHN WHEELER and 8th Great-Grandmother SARAH LARKIN
Sarah's father, 9th Great-Grandfather Deacon Edward Larkin,  a Wheelmaker, was Born about 1615 in England and 9th Great-Grandmother Joanna (Hale), Pentecost, married about 1638 in Concord, Middlesex, Massachusetts Bay Colony
#3 EBENEEZER WHEELER married MARY MINOT .....Ebenezer 3 / John 2 / Geo 17th Great-Grandfather EBENEZER WHEELER  m. 7th Great-Grandmother MARY MINOT daughter of 8th Great-Grandfather Captain Dr. James Minott (Minot), Esquire & his wife Rebecca Wheeler [#2905] [daughter of Capt. Timothy Wheeler [#2901].
Captain Dr. James Minott (Minot), Esquire studied medicine and theology at Harvard College. By the time James attended Harvard, it was the main place of higher education in the English colonies. He graduated in the Class of 1675. Captain Dr. James Minott (Minot), Esquire Birth-date: September 14, 1653 Birthplace: Dorchester Center, Boston, Suffolk County, Massachusetts, Colonial AmericaDeath: September 20, 1735 (82) Concord, Middlesex County, Massachusetts, Colonial America7th Great-Grandmother MARY MINOT daughter of 8th Great-Grandfather Captain Dr. James Minott (Minot),
3. Mary Minot – B. 16 Nov 1689, Concord, Massachusetts; D. 3 Sep 1760, Concord, Massachusetts; m. Ebenezer Wheeler (1682-1748), 26 Sep 1706, Concord, Massachusetts
#4 JAMES WHEELER  b. 7 April 1722 m. Abigail Ball (sic wrong Hall in some records) in Rutland, MA 24 May 17506th Great-Grandfather  #4 JAMES WHEELER b. 7 April 1722 maried ABIGALL BALL  in Rutland MA 24 May 1750
#3 EBENEZER WHEELER married MARY MINOT ...... #4 James  / #3 Ebenezer / #2 John  / #1 George
10th Great-Uncle William deJanes (Jennes) sailed 1637 to New Haven, Connecticut Colony, British America New Haven Early Planters’ and first New Haven town clerks, who clerked many years.9th Great-Grandfather William Jayne I, sailed 1643 and nephew of 10th Great-Uncle William deJanes (Jennes) sailed 1637  
William Jayne I my 9th Great-Grandfather sailed 1643`to New Haven, Connecticut Colony, British America. This is the oldest original tombstone in Setauket Presbyterian Churchyard, Setauket, Brookhaven, Long Island, New York, across the bay from New Haven, Connecticut

  • "Here lyes ye Body of William Jayne Born at Bristol, Eng. January ye 25th 1618 Dec'd ye March 24th 1714 AE 96 year" Puritan immigrant.

William de Jayne I, son of Henry, joined his uncle, as an early planter in 1643, but returned to England to join Oliver Cromwell, as his Chaplain, for the English War and dethronement of King Charles. William de Jayne I made a second trip to New Haven inn 1678 to join his uncle after the English War. [‘Early Planters’ in the Colony of New Haven Connecticut in 1637 to 1638. transcriber's note: listed were the name of the 'Planters' but not how much land they owned, as that is hard to read on this pdf file].

  • 10th Great-Grandfather Lawrence Woodhull (1575 - 1620) 
  • 9th Great-Grandfather.  Richard Woodhull Sr. (1620 - 1690) 
  • 8th Great-Grandfather Richard Woodhull Jr: Born in Thenford, England 1620, Settled in Setauket, Brookhaven, Long Island, Died Oct. 17, 1690. Puritan immigrant. 
  • 8th Great-Grandfather Richard Woodhull Jr married 20 Nov 1684 in Brookhaven, Suffolk, New YorkTemperance (Topping) Woodhull (1663-1706) 8th Great-Grandmother 
  • 8th Great-Grandmother Temperance Topping Woodhull Born 1663 in Southampton, Suffolk, New York was Daughter of John Topping and Sarah (White) Topping 
  • 8th Great-Grandfather Richard Woodhull Jr and 8th Great-Grandmother Temperance (Topping) Woodhull were the parents of Elizabeth (Woodhull) Jayne.
  • 7th Great-Grandfather WILLIAM JAYNE II and 7th Great-Grandmoher ELIZABETH WOODHULL JAYNE
  • 9th Great-Grandfather Captain Thomas Topping, born in Totternhoe, Bedfordshire, England, and died in Branford, Connecticut. Captain Thomas Topping member of The Connecticut Colony, which was a British America Colony in New England which became the state of Connecticut. It was organized on March 3, 1636 as a settlement for a Puritan congregation. Capt Topping had residences in Wethersfield, Conn. (1636) and Milford, Conn. (1640) and Hempstead, L.I. (1644), Southampton, Long island, NY 1649-1673 “leaving his mark as a man of strong character and action upon each community.”
  • 8th Great-GrandFather Thomas Josselyn aka Joslin, Josselyne, Jostlin, Joscelin arrived in Massachusetts Bay Colony 1635 Died 3 Jan 1661 in Lancaster, Middlesex, Massachusetts Bay Colony
  • 9th Great-Grandfather William Hopkins I  b. 1594 Stratford, Bedfordshire, England, United Kingdom d. 1644 Age 51 Death in Stratford, Fairfield, Connecticut Colony, British Colonial America
  • Children (1) William Hopkins 1630-1688
  • Son 8th Great-Grandfather - William Hopkins II 1625 England -1688 Marriage: about 1655 Probably, Roxbury, Boston, Suffolk, , Roxbury, Suffolk County, Massachusetts

Massachusetts Bay Colony, British Colonial America

  • see picture above in Photos


11th Great-Grandfather James Cole
The first ship arrived in :Plymouth Colony (Massachusetts) in 1620. James Cole arrived in 1633 one of the last ships to Plymouth Colony.  James was accompanied by Wife Mary Tibbes 11th Great-Grandmother ; Sons Hugh, John, James and Daughter Mary


Mary TIBBES (James Cole Spouse) Marriage was Christen 15 Jun 1598, Barnstaple, Devon, England. Mary TIBBES Death aft 7 Mar 1659/60, Plymouth, Plymouth, MA. Her Father was John Tybbs (-br. 1609) and Mother Margaret Harris (ch. 1573-)

James Cole was the first settler who lived on "Cole's Hill", the first burial ground of the Pilgrims, as it is still known. This land probably included the ground upon which rests Plymouth Rock. He had several grants of land thereafter.


"The Pilgrims built their first houses on Leyden Street rising from the side of Cole's Hill to Burial Hill, and the hill was used in 1620–1621 as a burial ground during the  Pilgrims first winter in New England. The main town cemetery was established 1637 called Burial Hill. 


"Among those whose remains may have been interred on Cole's Hill are John Carver, Elizabeth Winslow, Mrs. Mary Allerton, Rose Standish, Christopher Martin, Solomon Powers, William Mullins, William White, Degory Priest, Richard Britteridge, John and Edward Tilley and Thomas Rogers. The total burials may have been between 45 and 50.[4][5]


Cole's Hill became the property of James Cole, who arrived in 1633 and kept a tavern on the hill in the 1640s. It is from him that the hill's name derives: "Cole's Hill" first appears in town records in 1698. Older oral tradition, however, maintained that the first burying ground of the Pilgrims was here. In 1742, the General Court of Plymouth granted a sum of money to the town to erect a battery here. It continued to be kept up during the Revolutionary War and 1814 companies of soldiers who were billeted in the town.


In the 18th and 19th centuries, various remains were uncovered at Cole's Hill and attributed to the victims of the winter of 1620–21.  A summary of these was provided by John A. Goodwin. 


About 1920 the hill was transformed into a public park The existing buildings having been removed from the hill, paths and plantings were added.[3] Cole's Hill was declared a National Historic Landmark in 1960, and was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1966.[2][3]


James Cole's name appears upon the tax list of Plymouth in 1634; James Coles was born about 1600 based on the date of his marriage in Barnstaple, Devonshire. He died after October 1678. Emigration: 1633. surveyor of highways in 1641, 42, 51, and 52; was constable in 1641 and 1644; and served on a number of juries. In 1637 his name appears upon a list of volunteers against the Pequot Indians. He apparently followed several trades, but most importantly was an innkeeper and owned a tavern.(many references). In 1668 he sold most of his land to his son, James. In 1689 his son, James, Jr., sold it to William Shurtliffe.


James Cole opened an ordinary, a British tavern and eating house serving regular meals on Cole's Hill, just above Plymouth Rock, which he later moved to Winslow's house, formerly Brewster's, in the very center of town at the corner of the street and the highway." Please don’t confuse him with James Cole of Saco, Maine.


James Cole owned and was the 1st resident of Coles Hill in Plymouth above Plymouth landing, Massachusetts.[ see above picture Cole's Hill in Plymouth, MA, USA, site of the Pilgrims' settlement and a U.S.  National Historic Landmark [source Daniel Case]


Sampson Cole Born 7 Mar 1755 in Swansea, Bristol, Massachusetts, Colonial America and 1st married Keziah Cole and had at least 3 children; Keziah, Samuel, and David Cole. Sampson's wife, Keziah Cole, died. Later Sampson married Lydia Wheeler. Sampson and Lydia had at least 5 children; Jesse, Martha (Patty), Ann, Elizabeth, and Abigail Cole.Sampson was buried at what is known now as River Bend Cemetery about 3 miles north of St. Clair Bottom Primitive Baptist Church, Smyth County, Virginia.   

  1. "National Register Information System". National Register of Historic Places. National Park Service. April 15, 2008.
  2. "Cole's Hill". National Historic Landmark summary listing. National Park Service. Archived from the original on 2012-10-02. Retrieved 2008-08-10.
  3. Polly M. Rettig and Charles E. Shedd (December 10, 1974) National Register of Historic Places Inventory-Nomination: Cole's Hill, National Park Service and Accompanying three photos, from 1974 [Wikipedia]


Stephen Wheeler was minister 1811-1819. Pre-Revolutionary churches in Southwest Virginia, organized in 1775, the present building was erected in 1851 on the site of a log meeting house deed to the congregation by Colonial Joseph Cole is is buried in the cemetery surrounding the church.


6th Great Grandfather John Lewis married Margaret Lynn 1678 1 FEB 1762  Ireland, Donegal Co  VA, Staunton.  see Descendants of Richard Lewis, 1537 - 1628; Outline https://www.ourfamtree.org/descend.php/Richard-Lewis/92629
8th Great-GrandFather Thomas Josselyn aka Joslin, Josselyne, Jostlin, Joscelin Died 3 Jan 1661 in Lancaster, Middlesex, Massachusetts..  Thomas Josselyn was a Puritan Original Colonist of the Massachusetts Bay Colony

  • All U.S. and Canada, Passenger and Immigration Lists Index, 1500s-1900s results for Joslyn - ANCESTRYcom
  • Name                          Birth Year Arrival           Date Arrival           Place
  • Thomas Joslyn                                                        1635                 Massachusetts

Migration to Plymouth Colony 1620-1633A collaboration between Plimoth Plantation™ and the New England Historic Genealogical Society® supported by the Institute for Museum and Library Services www.PlymouthAncestors.org Introduction Plymouth Colony was begun in December 1620 by a small company of English men, women and children. One hundred and two passengers arrived at Cape Cod aboard the Mayflower in November, and eventually chose the abandoned Native town of Patuxet as the site of their new home. In the next few months, half of them died due to scurvy and other diseases. Those who lived went on to build homes, plant crops and raise families. Other English settlers followed, and the colony expanded As the English population increased, the colonists pushed out to land in the east, north and west, establishing additional towns. This brought them into increased contact, and eventually conflict, with the Native Peoples living there. Plymouth Beginnings The core group of Mayflower passengers were members of a reformed Christian church, referred to at the time as Separatists or Brownists, who were living in Leiden, Holland. They had originally emigrated from England to Holland in order to worship as they believed right. In separating from the Church of England, they had committed treason, and so faced prison or worse if they stayed and were caught. Many of those who went to Holland were from the Scrooby, Nottinghamshire area of England. The Leiden records reveal, however, that there were English men and women from a number of English counties, including Essex, Kent and Somerset. In 1620, the group emigrating from Leiden was joined by about fifty others recruited by the colony’s investors. It is probable that many of them were then living in the London area. They may, however, have come from other parts of England originally. In the next few years, three other ships arrived bringing additional settlers for Plymouth Colony – the Fortune in 1621, and the Anne and Little James in 1623. Most of the colonists for whom a place of origin has been identified, came from the east and south of England. There were a few, however, that came from places as far north as Berwick-upon-Tweed close to the Scottish border, and as far west as Bristol on the River Severn.Jamestown Virginia 6th Great-Grandfather Lieutenant Jonathan Giles Ellington6th Great-Grandfather Lieutenant Jonathan Giles Ellington,Virginia Pioneer, 1607 Jamestown Virginia Colony In 1607, 104 English men and boys arrived in North America to start a settlement. On May 13 they picked Jamestown, Virginia for their settlement, which was named after their King, James I. The settlement became the first permanent English settlement in North America.All U.S. and Canada, Passenger and Immigration Lists Index, 1500s-1900s results for Allington [Ancestry]Name Arrival Date Arrival PlaceGiles Allington 1607 Jamestown, Virginia→ 6th Great-Grandfather Lieutenant Jonathan Giles Ellington,Virginia Pioneer, 1607 Jamestown Virginia Colony  

Files coming soon.

Reclaim WALDEN POND WHEELER FAMILY ownership Recognition

    CONCLUSION GEORGE WHEELER SR. FAMILY'S NORTH WALDEN POND 44 ACERS 

 
For that time being, the 17th and most of the 18th Centuries, the 1635 Indian Treaty Land, 6-square-miles Concord Township Corporation including George Wheelers Sr.'s Walden pond 44 acers were a Puritan Theocratic 'City-State on the Hill'. [preached by Governor Winthrop in preparation for Massachusetts Bay Colony voyages to New England] 


Matthew 5:14 "You are the light of the world. A city located on a hill can't be hidden." [KJV Holy Bible] 


But for certain, from 1635 until the present 2021, the  6-square-miles Concord Corporation including George Wheelers Sr.'s Walden pond 44 acers were and continue until this day to be 'Indian Treaty Land' 'the Supreme Law of the Land' under the authority of the Federal Government i.e. the U.S Congress alone.  States have no authority meddling on or governing within 'Indian Treaty Land'. [SCOTUS McGIRT v. Oklahoma 2020] 


"Walden Pond State Reservation Park is managed by the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation and includes 462 acres of protected open space. Over 600,000 visitors per year come from near and all the world's continents to experience this beautiful and serene place that inspirational facility." [The Walden Woods Project]  

  • The John Wheeler (born March 19, 1643 Concord, MA) heirs and descendant families and  
  • ‘The Society for Walden Pond and George Wheeler Sr.’s (born 23 March 1606 in Cranfield, Bedford, England) History Restoration, Education and Preservation, including Henry David Thoreau and Native Indian’s ‘Cathedral of Nature’  History Restoration, Education and Preservation endeavor to : 

  1. reclaim the accurate George Wheeler Sr. History (born 23 March 1606 in Cranfield, Bedford, England)
  2. reclaim Concord Massachusetts Bay Colony and 1635 Indian Treaty History 
  3. reclaim recognition of George Wheeler Sr. Families’ North Walden Pond 44 acres ownership.
  4. for documentation, education and publication within all Walden Pond State Reservation Park facilities so engaged. 


The proprietors of the Walden Pond 44 acres Self-Executed’ the property with inhabitant living existence, which Ratified the ‘Supreme Law of the Land’ Indian Treaty.

 

This requested property action is similar to promises of Eastern Oklahoma in SCOTUS McGirt v. Oklahoma, but different because the Walden Pond 44 acres Indian Treaty property is that of the foreign settlers, not the Native Indian Tribe. Nevertheless, the ‘Supreme Law of the Land’ Indian Treaty Contract jurisdiction impacts both parties of the  Indian Treaty Contract. All agreements and promises of both parties’ to the ‘Supreme Law of the Land’ Indian Treaty Contract are not one-sided either way, as with negotiations of any  ordinary contract. [SCOTUS] 


The proprietors’ inhabitant living existence included continued family ownership of the Walden Pond 44 acres, sacredness, baptisms, recreation and nature walks, taken to a new level by Thoreau 1845-1847. 


George Wheeler Sr. and his bequeathed and descendant family owned and naturally preserved the Indian Treaty North Walden Pond 44 acres from 1635 – 1845.  


During the 1841 Preemption ('Squatting') Law misconception, unbeknown to the Wheeler family, in 1844 the historic  Emerson-Thoreau Cabin (Shanty)13.50 to 14 acres, depending on who measured, located in  George Wheeler Sr.'s North Walden Pond 44 acres, were sold by "Squatter" Thomas Wyman or his estate to the good-intentioned Ralph Waldo Emerson, apparently from the confusion. 


The 3 pages of  1845 deed, pictured in this report, was recorded in Middlesex County, Massachusetts and was for The South Walden Pond 41 acres that were sold by James Heywood to  Abel Moore and John Hosmer who sold the South Walden Pond 41 acres to Ralph Waldo Emerson 1845 deed Book 473, pp. 351-353, Middlesex County, Massachusetts 1845.  That deed was recorded for the  legitimate purchase of the South Walden Pond 41 acres.   


Emerson-Thoreau Cabin (Shanty) unauthorized Wheeler 13.50 to 14 acres  located in  George Wheeler Sr.'s North Walden Pond 44 acres and 2 other family sections with no Middlesex County deeds and the South Walden Pond 41 acres with Middlesex County deeds pictured were donated to the Massachusetts State Park system in 1922 by the Emerson family’s grandson and others.  

   

North Walden Pond 44 acres and surrounding pond land with adjacent shoreline, the setting of Henry David Thoreau’s ‘Walden’ was donated in 3 sections  to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in 1922 by the Emerson family 13.50, Forbes family 16.38 acres, and the Hoar family 13.6 acre North of the Pond water. These  are shareholder George Wheeler Sr.’s Walden Pond 44 acres stockholds, North of the shoreline and Pond water.


The 1922 donations by the Heywood family were 7.59 acres East and by the Emerson family 33.1 acres South of the Walden Pond shoreline and pond water. 


The Emerson family 13.50 to 14 acres North of the Pond water and Emerson family 41 acres South of the pond water were not adjacent but separated by location North and South of Pond water. The total North and South Emerson 54.50 acres are often confused with the North George Wheeler Sr.’s Walden Pond 44 acres. The photo above  identifies the correct acreage, owner and location differences.


Appropriately, to again facilitate the Preservation of Walden Pond, which is now being desecrated, contaminated, polluted, overwhelmed and brutalized, while divagating to a totally diseased demise by the park system. The Society is seeking to reclaim our George Wheeler Sr. family’s recognition of the North Walden Pond 44 acres promised, agreed, Colonized, Purchased and Incorporated by George Wheeler Sr. who was 1 of the 15 Colonists, Purchasers, and Incorporators of the Concord Massachusetts Bay Corporation.


1961 Middlesex County Commissioners, managing the land around Walden Pond were sued to stop destruction of existing Walden Pond environment. Massachusetts Superior Court Judge David A. Rose ruled the Walden Pond deed donation to the park system required Preservation of the Walden Pond Land and barred development [9]. Judge was celebrated by school children for saving Walden Pond. Walden Pond became a Massachusetts State Park system 1975 with Judge Rose’s stipulation before allowing its donation to state park system. Unfortunately, Judge David A. Rose stipulation has long since been forgotten and violated.

  • References:
  • 5.  http://npshistory.com/publications/national-historic-preservation-act.pdf
  • 6. "2012 Acreage Listing" (PDF). Department of Conservation and Recreation. April 2012. Retrieved January 30, 2014.
  • 7. "NHL nomination for Walden Pond". National Park Service. Retrieved 2015-02-28.
  • 8. Austin Meredith. "A History of the Uses of Walden Pond". American Transcendentalism Web. Retrieved December 8, 2014.
  • 9. Sullivan, Ronald (May 5, 1995). "David A. Rose, 89; Massachusetts Judge Headed Rights Panel". The New York Times. Retrieved 2008-10-28.
  • 10. "Porous Pavement". Miller Microcomputer Services. 1997. Retrieved 15 August 2011.
  • [Wikipedia]


George Wheeler Sr.’s History Preservation is equally important. George Wheeler Sr., together  with his fellow 14 Puritan Concord Company Incorporators lived in peace and ‘concordance’ (the reason for the name Concord) with their Native Indian neighbors. The Society advocates  improved environmental protection, less contamination and pollution and the accurate history of Walden Pond and George Wheeler Sr., Concord, Massachusetts. George Wheeler’s history has been smothered by the Walden Pond Massachusetts State Park System not included in the gift shops and libraries.
 

The United States and other Industrialized countries need natural, sacred, concordant, safe parks for contemplation and self-helped psychotherapy as managed by the Wheeler family’s Indian Treaty ownership at their Walden Pond Park from 1635 to 1845. Unwanted poachers and squatters occasionally crept through Wheeler family oversight according to Thoreau's book ‘Walden’. 


Walden Pond is now in the Walden Pond State Reservation, Concord, Massachusetts and is a National Historic Landmark.
 

Walden Pond and its cousin-parks do not need brutalizing concrete jungles driven by revenue similar to the ‘operations’ of current Walden Pond State Reservation. Thoreau would become severely unwell and literally admonish the devastating conditions were he alive at this time, because the present conditions defeat the purpose his ‘Walden’.
 

The present Walden Pond condition represents Thoreau’s extensive lifetime admonitions. How devastating are the current ‘progressive’ Walden Pond State Reservation Thoreauvian counter-productions? 500,000 worldwide tourists visit the WPSR annually. Some visitors are shocked, disappointed and feel cheated by the differences seen and prices charged. Abundant criticisms  are readily obvious when the internet researched for the horrendous conditions of the park now versus the beloved Walden Park described by Thoreau.
 

George Wheeler Sr. was born 23 Mar in Cranfield, Bedford, England 1606. His father was Thomas Wheeler. George Wheeler Sr. was an early settler of Concord, Massachusetts. His first record in Concord was his arrival 1635. [Ancestry.com]
 

"He appears to have been a person of some influence, and his name appears often on town records. He was selectman in 1660. His house lot of 11 acres was at the (present) corner of Main and Walden Streets. He owned a large amount of land in the center of the town. He had other lands near the ‘frog-pond’ and 44 acres with shoreline North of Walden Pond, and at Nut Meadow Brook, naming a few.
 

His will was dated January 28, 1684 and presented for probate June 2, 1687. (Suffolk Prob. Reg. Vol. X fol. 1)  His sons Thomas and John were named coexecutors, but Captain Thomas Wheeler died in 1687 from wounds he sustained in 1675 King Phillips War. Thomas died, the same year of George Wheeler Sr.’s probate and John Wheeler was named sole executor.
 

George Wheeler Sr.’s age at death was 78. His will names “the children of his deceased son William, his sons Thomas and John, daughters Elizabeth Fletcher, Sarah Dudley, Ruth Hartwell and Hannah Fletcher, and the children of his daughter surnamed ‘Fox' “.
 

George Wheeler Sr.’s son, sole executor John Wheeler, executed the equal shares of Walden Pond and Flint’s Pond, not in 2 halves each, but Thomas was more efficaciously executed all Flint’s Pond 16 acres, the more attractive at the time and John, himself, executed the more historic later, the 44 acres with shoreline North of Walden Pond.
 

The following is the mid-section of this reporter’s 9th Great-Grandfather George Wheeler Sr. Will in 1684 illustrating the bequeath of Walden Pond and Flint's Pond to his sons, Thomas and John Wheeler, who were co-executors of his will. 

  • References
    1. Trent, pg. 99
    2. New England Historic Genealogical Society, pg. 34
    3. a b Albert Gallatin Wheeler, pg. 1
    4. Bonfanti, pg. 29 5. Gallatin Wheeler, pg. 12 6. Sltokin and Folsom, pg. 237 7. Sltokin and Folsom, pg. 42
     

On 21 Sept. 1687 administration of Thomas Wheeler estate was granted to his widow Hannah, and his son Thomas Wheeler Jr. The inventory begins: “an inventory of the estate of Thomas Wheeler, son of George Wheeler Sr. late of Concord deceased.” (Suffolk Prob. Reg. Vol. X fol 115-116). ["George Wheeler will January 28, 1684/5, presented for probate June 2, 1687. (Suffolk Prob. Reg. Vol. X fol. 1)"]
 

This reporter’s 8th Great-Grandfather John Wheeler, was named sole executor."[Source: The Wheeler Families of Old Concord, Massachusetts https://concordlibrary.org/special-collections/wheeler-genealogy/Compiled by George Tolman in 1908 Revised for editions of 1970 and 1981 and by Joseph C. Wheeler for this online edition of 2006.]

Following is mid-section of this reporter’s 9th Great-Grandfather George Wheeler Sr. Will 1684 illustrating bequeath of Walden Pond and Flint's Pond to his sons Thomas and John Wheeler
  Photo above
 

1635 Trialism Indian Treaty (3 methods) between now Concord Massachusetts, ‘Musketaquid’  Pennacook Native Indian Tribe and Concord Massachusetts Bay Colony, comprised of 15 men and families, who were 1. Colonists 2. Purchasers and 3. Incorporators that included this reporter’s 9th Great-Grandfather, George Wheeler Sr., who purchased Walden Pond 44 acres among many other properties, who bequeathed Walden Pond to his 2 descendant sons, and his subsequent descendants continue to  own, because Indian Treaties’ promises, agreements and perpetuity are the ‘Law of the Land’.  
 

George Wheeler Sr. and his bequeathed and descendant family owned and naturally preserved the Indian Treaty North Walden Pond 44 acres from 1635 – 1845.  


During the 1841 Preemption ('Squatting') Law misconception, unbeknown to the Wheeler family, in 1844 the historic  Emerson-Thoreau Cabin (Shanty) 13.50 to 14 acres located in  George Wheeler Sr.'s North Walden Pond 44 acres, were sold by "Squatter" Thomas Wyman or his estate to the good-intentioned Ralph Waldo Emerson, apparently from the confusion. 


The 1845 deed, pictured in this report, was recorded in Middlesex County, Massachusetts and was for The South Walden Pond 41 acres that were sold by James Heywood to  Abel Moore and John Hosmer who sold the South Walden Pond 41 acres to Ralph Waldo Emerson 1845 deed Book 473, pp. 351-353, Middlesex County, Massachusetts 1845.  That deed was recorded for the  legitimate purchase of the South Walden Pond 41 acres. 


States have no authority-over and jurisdiction-of Indian Treaty Land when Reservations are Self-Executed by both Indian Treaty Parties and thus are Ratified Law.
 

The land acquired by the Concord Puritans was equivalent to purchased stockholds for their Incorporated Company. Only U.S. Congress can modify, disestablish Native Indian Treaties and regulate commerce of Native Indian Treaties, but U.S. Congress has never done so. [SCOTUS McGirt v. Oklahoma 2020] 


The Constitution Annotated, Article VI Clause 2:  “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Indian Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.” [the Constitution Annotated https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/article-6/clause-2]

 
Articles VI, Clause 2 Constitution is equivalent to U.S. Congress and is equivalent to Native Indian Treaties; the 3 have the same authority. Native Indian Treaties are superior-to and untouchable-by states, because Native Indian Treaties are Federal, Constitutional, U.S. Congressional’ Law of the Land’.
 

To emphasize how serious Indian Treaty ‘Law of the Land’ agreement violations are for either involved Indian Treaty party, Sioux Indian Tribe was compensated $1 Billion in 2011 for unlawful Indian Treaty mistakes, but the Sioux Indian Tribe disagreed because Sioux Indian Tribe regarded $1 Billion compensation was too small.
 

The wrong Sovereign, the state of Oklahoma, convicted Jimmy McGirt. McGirt’s prosecution should have been in the Sovereign Indian Nation Reservation jurisdiction in Eastern Oklahoma, not the state of Oklahoma’s jurisdiction. Native Indian Treaties’ promises and agreements of both parties are superior-to states and untouchable-by states.[SCOTUS McGirt v. Oklahoma 2020]
 

Concord, Massachusetts Sovereign Pennacook Native Indian ‘Nation’ Treaty with Sovereign Concord Massachusetts Bay Colony Puritan ‘Nation’ promises, agreements and Reservations are the Federal ‘Law of the Land’, superior-to and untouchable-by the state of Massachusetts.
 

The Sovereign U.S. Congress has never disestablished Sovereign Native Indian Reservations and Native Indian Treaties.
 

George Wheeler Sr. was one of the 15 Colonists, Purchasers and Incorporators (stockholders) of the Sovereign Concord Massachusetts Bay Colony Puritan ‘Nation’ who purchased ‘6 mile square’ boundaries of Concord, MA that enclosed and included George Wheeler Sr.’s Walden Pond 44 acres in the Indian Treaty from the Pennacook Native Indian ‘Nation’ and established Sovereign Native Pennacook Indian ‘Praying Town Reservations’ and agreements and promises that have never been disestablished by U.S. Congress. [SCOTUS McGirt v. Oklahoma 2020]  
 

The Colonists, Purchaser, Stockholder-Land Incorporators’ Puritan Concord Theocratic Government, and Native Pennacook Indian Trialism (3 methods) Treaty and the Puritan philosophical disassociation from the Crown, that was embroiled in soon to be Civil War with dethronement and beheading of King Charles I, rendered Concord unique and set the independent Company with entrepreneurial settlers apart from other settlements.
 

George Wheeler Sr. and his bequeathed and descendant family owned and naturally preserved the Indian Treaty North Walden Pond 44 acres from 1635 – 1845.  


During the 1841 Preemption ('Squatting') Law misconception, unbeknown to the Wheeler family, in 1844 the historic  Emerson-Thoreau Cabin (Shanty) 13.50 to 14 acres located in  George Wheeler Sr.'s North Walden Pond 44 acres, were sold by "Squatter" Thomas Wyman or his estate to the good-intentioned Ralph Waldo Emerson, apparently from the confusion. 


The 1845 deed, pictured in this report, was recorded in Middlesex County, Massachusetts and was for The South Walden Pond 41 acres that were sold by James Heywood to  Abel Moore and John Hosmer who sold the South Walden Pond 41 acres to Ralph Waldo Emerson 1845 deed Book 473, pp. 351-353, Middlesex County, Massachusetts 1845.  That deed was recorded for the  legitimate purchase of the South Walden Pond 41 acres.
 

Similar to the ‘Indian Removal Act’ signed into law May 28, 1830, by United States President Andrew Jackson and ‘Trail of Tears’ to Oklahoma Reservation, which was never disestablished by U. S. Congress, but disregarded all these years until [SCOTUS McGirt v. Oklahoma 2020].
 

The Wrong Sovereign in 1844 allowed the sale the 13.50 to 14 acres within the North Walden Pond 44 acres, that includes the historic Emerson-Thoreau Cabin (Shanty) which were mistakenly ‘squatted by Henry David Thoreau and others.  


George Wheeler Sr. bequeathed the North Walden Pond 44 acres to his son and sole will executor, John Wheeler  b. 19 March 1643  who married Sarah Larkin. The descendant family owned and naturally preserved the North Walden Pond 44 acres from 1635 – 1845.  


During the 1841 Preemption ('Squatting') Law misconception, unbeknown to the Wheeler family, in 1844 the 14 acres of the North Walden Pond 44 acres, that includes the historic Emerson-Thoreau Cabin (Shanty), were sold to the good-intentioned Ralph Waldo Emerson from 'Squatter' Thomas Wyman, the potter,  apparently amid the 'Squatter' confusion. No deed was available and therefore no deed was recorded.


The South Walden Pond 41 acres were sold by James Heywood to  Abel Moore and John Hosmer who sold the South Walden Pond 41 acres to Ralph Waldo Emerson 1845 deed Book 473, pp. 351-353, Middlesex County, Massachusetts 1845.  That deed was recorded.


George Wheeler Sr’s North Walden Pond 44 acres is Right (North) of (Green) Walden Pond where Thoreau Shanty is located. Heywood ~36 acres property is on the left South of Walden Pond. In 1922 Heywood family donated and Ralph Waldo Emerson donated ~80 acres to State of Massachusetts for Recreation and Preservation.  See Photo above


Above the Walden Pond Reservation picture depicts the Heywood property accurately to the left or South of Walden Pond and the George Wheeler Sr. / Ralph Waldo Emerson 44 Acres Walden Pond right or North of Walden Pond containing the Thoreau - Emerson Shanty. 


The picture above without the family names better shows North Walden Pond and Thoreau-Emerson Shanty North at the top. Heywood property is accurately below or South of Walden Pond. 

Photo above


Henry David Thoreau discussed himself a squatter and his neighbor James Wymans a squatter
in [
Henry David Thoreau’s ‘Walden’, A Life in the Woods 1st published August 9, 1854. it sold just around 300 copies a year]


South Walden Pond 41 acres  were transferred by deed and recorded in 1845. The North  like so: James Wyman, a potter who made pottery, and was a Walden Pond 'squatter', a legal term, did not fulfil rightful conditions for ownership, according to informant, Henry David Thoreau in his historic book 'Walden'. The sheriff attempted in vain to collect taxes from Wyman, which must have been the order of the day for 'squatters'. 


George Wheeler Sr. and his bequeathed and descendant family owned and naturally preserved the North Walden Pond 44 acres from 1635 – 1845.  During the 1841 Preemption ('Squatting') Law misconception, unbeknown to the Wheeler family, in 1844 the 13.50 to 14 acres of the North Walden Pond 44acres, that includes the historic Emerson-Thoreau Cabin (Shanty), were sold with no deed to the good-intentioned Ralph Waldo Emerson, apparently from the confusion. 


The 1845 deed, pictured in this report, was recorded in Middlesex County, Massachusetts and was for The South Walden Pond 41 acres that were sold by James Heywood to  Abel Moore and John Hosmer who sold the South Walden Pond 41 acres to Ralph Waldo Emerson 1845 deed Book 473, pp. 351-353, Middlesex County, Massachusetts 1845.  That deed was recorded for the  legitimate purchase of the South Walden Pond 41 acres.  


Both were donated to the Massachusetts State Park system in 1922 by the Emerson family’s grandson.   The South Walden Pond land description, not the shanty section , was recorded in book 473 and pages 351-353 in the William Francis Galvin, Registry of Deeds Division, Maria C. Curtatone, Register of Deeds, Southern Middlesex District, PO Box 410068, Cambridge, MA 02141-0001. Page 2 of the deed page 352 with the important details of the deed posted above.


Thoreau and Emerson were initially close friends and business associates. Thoreau described himself a 'squatter', in his epic book 'Walden', during his 2 year experimental residence 1845 to 1847 on George Wheeler Sr.'s  North Walden Pond 44 acres property that Emerson allegedly had purchased from Thomas Wyman without a recorded deed. 


Possibly, only Wyman and Henry David Thoreau, a surveyor himself, realized and published in 'Walden', the 14 acres of the North Walden Pond 44 acres had no survey and no deed in  1844and, therefore, the reason for Ralph Waldo Emerson's scathing Henry David Thoreau Eulogy when Thoreau died. Imagine, a scathing Eulogy!


¶ 10 'Walden' paragraph 107 “Farther in the woods than any of these, where the road approaches nearest to the pond, Wyman the potter squatted, and furnished his townsmen with earthen ware, and left descendants to succeed him. Neither were they rich in worldly goods, holding the land by sufferance while they lived; and there often the sheriff came in vain to collect the taxes, and “attached a chip,” for form’s sake, as I have read in his accounts, there being nothing else that he could lay his hands on. 


{{{ Estate by sufferance is a type of leasehold estate in which a tenant stays in possession of a property after the lease has expired or been legally terminated without the consent of the owner/landlord. It is the holding by one who came into possession rightfully, after the termination of the interest under which s/he came into possession, for example, the continuance in possession after termination of a life estate by a person who had entered under lease from the life tenant. }}}


“One day in midsummer, when I was hoeing, a man who was carrying a load of pottery to market stopped his horse against my field and inquired concerning Wyman the younger. He had long ago bought a potter’s wheel of him and wished to know what had become of him. I had read of the potter’s clay and wheel in Scripture, but it had never occurred to me that the pots we use were not such as had come down unbroken from those days, or grown on trees like gourds somewhere, and I was pleased to hear that so fictile an art was ever practiced in my neighborhood.


¶ 11 'Walden' paragraph 115 The last inhabitant of these woods before me was an Irishman, Hugh Quoil, (if I have spelt his name with coil enough,) who occupied Wyman’s tenement,—Col. Quoil, he was called. Rumor said that he had been a soldier at Waterloo. If he had lived I should have made him fight his battles over again. His trade here was that of a ditcher. Napoleon went to St. Helena; Quoil came to Walden Woods. All I know of him is tragic. He was a man of manners, like one who had seen the world, and was capable of more civil speech than you could well attend to. He wore a greatcoat in mid-summer, being affected with the trembling delirium, and his face was the color of carmine. He died in the road at the foot of Brister’s Hill shortly after I came to the woods, so that I have not remembered him as a neighbor. Before his house was pulled down, when his comrades avoided it as “an unlucky castle,” I visited it. There lay his old clothes curled up by use, as if they were himself, upon his raised plank bed. His pipe lay broken on the hearth, instead of a bowl broken at the fountain. The last could never have been the symbol of his death, for he confessed to me that, though he had heard of Brister’s Spring, he had never seen it; and soiled cards, kings of diamonds spades and hearts, were scattered over the floor. One black chicken which the administrator could not catch, black as night and as silent, not even croaking, awaiting Reynard, still went to roost in the next apartment. In the rear there was the dim outline of a garden, which had been planted but had never received its first hoeing, owing to those terrible shaking fits, though it was now harvest time. It was over-run with Roman wormwood and beggar-ticks, which last stuck to my clothes for all fruit. The skin of a woodchuck was freshly stretched upon the back of the house, a trophy of his last Waterloo; but no warm cap or mittens would he want more. [‘WALDEN by Henry David Thoreau’, A Life in the Woods 1st published  August 9, 1854, it sold just around 300 copies a year]


In 2020, 500,000 people recreated and visited Walden Pond when the area and Pond were reported as terribly contaminated and polluted. The failure to preserve Walden’s Pond violates the 1961 Massachusetts Superior Court Judge David A. Rose ruling stipulation that the Walden Pond deed donation to the park system required Preservation of the Walden Pond Land and barred development [9]. 


Members of The Society seek to reclaim Recognition for the Wheeler family’s  Walden Pond 44 acres ownership as promised, agreed, Colonized, Purchased and Incorporated by George Wheeler Sr.  of the 15 Colonists, Purchasers, and Incorporators of the Concord Massachusetts Bay Corporation. 1


Walden Pond was very special and remained untamed. Walden Pond was formed with retraction of ice after the Ice Age, which was The Pleistocene Epoch defined as the time period that began about 2.6 million years ago and lasted until about 11,700 years ago. The most recent Ice Age occurred then, as glaciers covered huge parts of the planet Earth. [By Kim Ann Zimmermann - Live Science Contributor August 29, 2017, Live Science]

“Walden Pond is a kettle lake, formed at the end of the last Ice Age, some 10,000 to 12,000 years ago, when a huge block of glacial ice broke off and remained behind as the glacier retreated to the north. [USGS
https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/1998/fs064-98/pdf/fs06498.pdf]


Native Indians were said to be spiritually ritualing and fell into the Walden Pond water when the Kettle formed after the land collapsed. The Pennacook Native Indians were spiritual people and Walden was once a natural, sacred place. Thousands of Artifacts have been found around Walden pond documenting the Pennacooks’ frequent presence.
 

Walden Pond was never unowned, unappropriated, public land since Native Indian inhabitation in the Paleoindian Period (12,000-9,000 BP) until now 2021 after ownership transfer from the Native Indians to George Wheeler Sr., 1635.
 

“Henry David Thoreau's theology of the wild was enabled through his engagement with Native Indians. Thoreau believed that for peoples' souls to survive being cut off physically from wilderness, they must cultivate this wilderness within–a feat they must learn–and appropriate–from indigenous peoples.” [Apostles of Wilderness: American Indians and Thoreau's Theology of the Wild (Lydia Willsky-Ciollo; Apostles of Wilderness: American Indians and Thoreau's Theology of the Wild. The New England Quarterly 2018; 91 (4): 551–591. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/tneq_a_00704]

“Thoreau's actions while living at Walden illustrate his concern with purification and rebirth. He has already stated that he swam early every morning in the pond. These actions function as a sort of ritual baptism, representing a new beginning and connecting Thoreau physically with nature. [
http://www.bradleypdean.com/research_writings/Bean_Field_Article.pdfRediscovery of Walden by Bradley P. Dean pp 90 -97.]
 

Many sacrament baptisms were ritualed in Walden Pond. Many came from far away, even Boston, for the sacred Walden Pond ‘Spring water. Walden Pond had the deepest Massachusetts Lake formed from melted ice and formed from a ‘glacialkettle-hole’ with deep spring water arising from the ‘aquifers’ found during Thoreau’s depth measures. Thoreau claimed “Walden Pond figuratively mingled with the Sacred Ganges water….All Nature and Humans are infused with Divine Spirituality and accessible Creation and Universe Energies…..Living close to Nature provides and essential Human being experience…..Walden Pond is the ‘Cathedral of Nature’.” [Thoreau, 18545/1992:264]


Frozen Walden water ice was transported overseas. Walden Pond enjoyed an international spiritual reputation. Speculators believed Walden Pond’s underdevelopment was because of its Aboriginal and Colonial sacredness.


But Water-Resources Investigations Report 2001-4137 revealed Contamination and Pollution to Walden Pond Groundwater Area (CPTWPGA)

  • · Concord municipal landfill + trailer park for now are outside CPTWPGA
  • · Walden Pond State Reservation Septic leach field restroom facilities are in CPTWPGA
  • · Nitrogen inputs (858 kms/year) =
  • 1. (30%) is plume water from the septic leach field
  • 2. (34 %) is likely swimmers’ + animal difficult to oxidize urine + N compounds: urea or uric acid C₅H₄N₄O₃. conversion to gases methane CHnitrous oxide N₂O,  ammonia NH₃ that combines with chlorine to form chloramines.
  • 3. Chlorine binds to swimmers’ body waste, sweat and urine and forms chloramines, that irritate skin, eyes, and the respiratory tract when they off gas from water
  • 4. Phosphorus (32 kgm/per year) = 2 Geohydrology + Limnology Walden Pond inputs dominated by atmospheric dry deposition, background ground water + = ~ swimmers’ + animal urine
  • 5. Phosphate is natural element in most swimmers’ + animal wastes => 50% in summer.
  • 6. The septic-system plume for now did not contribute phosphorus but increased the nitrogen to phosphorus ratio for inputs from 41 to 59, on an atom-to-atom basis. [Geohydrology and Limnology of Walden Pond, Concord, Massachusetts By John A. Colman and Paul J. Friesz]


The sale of Walden Pond 13.50 to 14 acres to Ralph Waldon Emerson 1844 was inappropriate because the  Colonial Landowners and Pennecook Native Indians Self-Executed’ inhabitant living existence, Ratified the ‘Law of the Land’ Indian Treaty, which was not disestablished by the U.S. Congress. 


The George Wheeler Sr.’s  44 acres of North Walden Pond property that included the 13.50 to 14 acres inappropriately sold to Emerson and other Indian Treaty agreements and promises were not disestablished by the U.S. Congress.

  

The only means by which the 1845 purchase of Walden Pond by Ralph Waldo Emerson 

can-be-held a lawful is for the entire Treaty between the Puritan Concord Colonists, Purchasers, Stockholder-Land Incorporators’ Theocratic Government and Native Pennacook Indian Nation to be disestablished by the U.S. Congress, which has never happened before by U.S. Congress. 


Walden Pond 44 acres and all other Concord purchased land ownership was Ratified by self-execution of the 'Supreme Law of the Indian Treaty Land' by concordant Native Indian and Concord Massachusetts Bay Colony living in compliance with SCOTUS McGirt v. Oklahoma 2020. 


Recognition of rightful ownership must be returned-to and reclaimed-by the bequeathed and executed descendants of George Wheeler Sr. The resumption of  Walden Pond 44 acres preservation, sanitation and decontamination and other essential requirements must be reinstated as conditioned by Judge Rose. 


1961 Middlesex County Commissioners, managing the land around Walden Pond were sued to stop destruction of existing Walden Pond environment. Massachusetts Superior Court Judge David A. Rose ruled the Walden Pond deed donation to the park system required Preservation of the Walden Pond Land and barred development [9]. 


Walden Pond water was deemed especially important, sacred and curative. Puritans were lured to Concord by Native Indian traders because of special appurtenances, like pastureland, freshwater streams, hunting, fishing and Walden Pond. But how must Humans compensate other Humans for spiritual deprivation? Spirituality and Spiritual deprivation are immeasurable. Incomprehensible and uncompensatable. 


How can Humans compensate other Humans for Spirituality and Spiritual deprivation from 1844, the year of  the unlawful sale of North Walden Pond 13.50 to 14 acres and loss of property and baptismal  use to the present year of this report 2021, 177 years?


The George Wheeler Sr. Descendant family’s North Walden Pond total 44 acres Recognition of Ownership must be reclaimed and Preservation reestablished as required by Judge Rose must proceed post-haste.
 

Grandfather Charles Wesley Wheeler’s father descended from George Wheeler Sr. Concord, MA. Grandfather Charles Wesley Wheeler’s mother, Urina Elizabeth Wheeler descended from a different Wheeler line: John Wheeler 1591-1670 m. Agnes Yeomans 1595-~1692 family from Rehoboth, Bristol, Massachusetts
 

From Concord, Massachusetts Bay Concord Colony, New Haven CT ‘Early Planters’ and Setauket, Brookhaven, Long island, New York and adjacent Puritan Colonies in 1600's this reporter’s ancestors settled and established Concord, KY and the Concord Church on the Big Sandy River across from the Buffalo Shoal near present Paintsville, KY. They intended to propagate Protestantism and convert lost souls. Thus far, 16% of this reporter’s heritage is Native American Creek and Cherokee Indian. Additional Native Indian ancestors are estimated. Additional research will proceed after this Walden Pond dilemma is rectified.  
 

========

Files coming soon.

What Good Is an Indian Treaty?

  "In the United States, our U.S. Constitution declares an Indian Treaty to be the law of the land and regarded in courts of justice as equivalent to a Statute, an Act of the Legislature, whenever it operates of itself, without the aid of any legislative provision." ...."The U.S. Constitution, an  Indian Treaty and a Statute (Law) convey the same authority."


"The U.S. Constitution enables Indian Treaties the authority to render promises the same as Law, thereby making  Indian Treaties enforceable by the courts. U.S. Constitution, Article VI, paragraph 2, makes  Indian Treaties the Supreme Law of the Land equal with acts of Congress  and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby."  


  [What Good Is an  Indian Treaty That Congress Can Simply Discard? Quite a Bit, as the Creek Nation’s Victory in the Supreme Court Shows, 22 JUL 2020, MICHAEL C. DORF, Verdict, 2021 Justia, posted in International Law]


"In McGirt v. Oklahoma, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that a substantial portion of the state of Oklahoma—including most of the city of Tulsa—is an Indian reservation of the Creek Nation. Writing for the majority consisting of himself and the Court’s four Democratic appointees, Justice Neil Gorsuch found that two treaties in the 1830s created the reservation, and that while an 1866 Indian Treaty reduced its size and subsequent Acts of Congress undercut the tribe’s rights, Congress has never disestablished the Reservation. 


"Because Justice Gorsuch reaffirmed the proposition that only U.S. Congress—not a state and not the courts—has the power to disestablish a Reservation, it remains valid.


There may be less to the holding in McGirt than immediately meets the eye.

Certainly the case does not transfer title of any land currently owned by non-Native persons to the Creek. The precise issue in the case was narrow and technical. A federal statute, the Major Crimes Act, provides that tribal members accused of certain serious offenses occurring “within the Indian country” are subject to criminal prosecution in federal court rather than in state court or tribal court. Accordingly, McGirt’s state court conviction for a gruesome sex crime against a four-year-old girl was set aside. Subject to the statute of limitations and the availability of evidence, he can be retried in federal court.


 "Justice Gorsuch’s opinion—beginning with an evocative reference to the infamous Trail of Tears—revealed that as currently constituted, the Court will give claims by Native Americans a sympathetic hearing.


 "Congress may, if it so chooses, wipe out the Creek reservation or any other reservation through a simple statute. The Constitution’s Supremacy Clause makes the Constitution, laws, and  Indian Treaties all the supreme law of the land but specifies no priority rule among them. Accordingly, U.S. courts have long inferred one: In a conflict with either a statute or an  Indian Treaty, the Constitution—as the fundamental law—prevails; but Indian Treaties and statutes are on an equal footing, so in a conflict between two or more statutes, two or more Indian Treaties, or a mix of statutes and Indian Treaties, the last in time takes precedence. 


As Justice Gorsuch explained in McGirt, Congress has “the authority to breach its own promises and Indian Treaties” through new legislation.


"Pacta sunt servanda expresses in Latin the fundamental notion that legal agreements and Indian Treaties especially, are binding;  the one exception is that only U.S. Congress can unbind them.


"Although a later-in-time statute supersedes an Indian Treaty as a matter of U.S. domestic law, the statute can put the U.S. in breach as a matter of international law. To be sure, truly foreign sovereigns may have options in response to an Indian Treaty breach that Native American tribes lack. A foreign sovereign can engage in diplomacy. It might have access to an international tribunal. It may be entitled to impose sanctions. 


"By contrast, the U.S. Constitution treats Native tribes as what Chief Justice John Marshall described in the 1831 case of Cherokee Nation v. Georgia as “domestic dependent nations,” who, owing to their dependence, have less capacity to protect their Indian Treaty rights than do fully independent sovereigns.


"As illustrated by Marshall’s rebuke of Andrew Jackson and the state of Georgia in Cherokee Nation and Worcester v. Georgia a year later—as well as by Justice Gorsuch’s opinion in McGirt—the Supreme Court stands ready to protect tribal Indian Treaty rights against usurpation by states, presidents, and even courts. Insisting that Congress and Congress alone can supersede Indian Treaty rights provides substantial protection against powerful actors who might otherwise be inclined to disregard tribal rights.


"As Justice Gorsuch noted in McGirt, the cumbersome process for the enactment of federal legislation set forth in Section 7 of the Constitution’s Article I means that inertia will also typically operate to protect a tribe’s rights. Requiring a clear statement by Congress to disestablish a reservation created by Indian Treaty—as the Court required in McGirt—goes a long way towards ensuring that Congress will leave Indian Treatyrights intact.


"Justice Gorsuch’s opinion for the SCOTUS in McGirt v. Oklahoma 2020 refused to deem reaty obligations to the Creek denied unless there is a clear new statute with a statement of denial by U.S. Congress. 


As a formal matter, a clear new U.S. Congress legislative statute  in operation provides magnanimous  protection, —which turns out to be a magnificent guarantor of legal rights.  [What Good Is a Treaty That Congress Can Simply Discard? Quite a Bit, as the Creek Nation’s Victory in the Supreme Court Shows, 22 JUL 2020, MICHAEL C. DORF, Verdict, 2021 Justia, posted in International Law]


  • The U.S. Constitution substantiated the ratification of the  *Treaty,.... in 1635, *between Puritan 'Communal' Concord Massachusetts Bay Colony and Aboriginal Pennacook Massachusett Indians, 
  • ...."the authority is the same as the 'the Law  of the Land or a U.S. Congress Legislative Statute" to promise Walden Pond 44 acres to George Wheeler Sr.; 
  • "thereby, making this *Treaty enforceable by the Courts."
  • "U.S. Constitution, Article VI, paragraph 2, makes this *Treaty the Supreme Law of the Land 
  • "equal with Legislative  Acts of U.S. Congress 
  • and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby." 
  • Therefore, "this *Treaty and the *Treaty's promises" of the Walden Pond 44 acres purchase by George Wheeler Sr. 
  • "can only be disestablished by an Act of U.S. Congress."  
  • the "*Treaty and the *Treaty promises" i.e., the sale and cession Walden Pond 44 acres to George Wheeler Sr. "cannot be disestablished" by allowing the sale of Walden Pond 44 acres by the state of Massachusetts.
  • "The U.S Congress has never disestablished a Indian Treaty and / or a promise of a Indian Treaty." [SCOTUS McGirt v. Oklahoma, Justice Gorsuch penned the decision]
  • God alone knows the magnitude of all the 'fractures' of this *Treaty and this *Treaty's promises.


Trialism Indian Treaty ====  1635 Trialism (3 methods) Indian Treaty between Native ‘Musketquid’, (now Concord Massachusetts), Pennacook Indians and Concord Massachusetts Bay Colony, comprised of 15 men and families, who were  1. Colonists, 2. Purchasers and 3. Incorporators, that included this reporter's  9th Great-Grandfather, George Wheeler Sr., who purchased Walden Pond 44 acres among many other properties, whose will bequeathed Walden Pond to his descendants, that by Trialism Indian Treaty, descendants continue to own, because Indian Treaties are the Law of the Land. 


But North Walden Pond 44 acres were mistakenly ‘squatted by Henry David Thoreau and others and ultimately  13.50 to 14 acres  sold to Ralph Waldo Emerson 1844, before known, and entire 44 acres donated to Massachusetts State Park, along with his South Walden Pond 41 acres.


 George Wheeler Sr. and his bequeathed and descendant family owned and naturally preserved the Indian Treaty North Walden Pond 44 acres from 1635 – 1845.

  
During the 1841 Preemption ('Squatting') Law misconception, unbeknown to the Wheeler family, in 1844 the historic  Emerson-Thoreau Cabin (Shanty)  13.50 to 14 acres  located in  George Wheeler Sr.'s North Walden Pond 44 acres, were sold by "Squatter" Thomas Wyman or his estate to the good-intentioned Ralph Waldo Emerson, apparently from the confusion. 


The 1845 deed, pictured in this report, was recorded in Middlesex County, Massachusetts and was for The South Walden Pond 41 acres that were sold by James Heywood to  Abel Moore and John Hosmer who sold the South Walden Pond 41 acres to Ralph Waldo Emerson 1845 deed Book 473, pp. 351-353, Middlesex County, Massachusetts 1845.  That deed was recorded for the  legitimate purchase of the South Walden Pond 41 acres. 


Emerson-Thoreau Cabin (Shanty) unauthorized Wheeler  13.50 to 14 acres  and 2 other family sections with no Middlesex County deeds located in  George Wheeler Sr.'s North Walden Pond 44 acres and the South Walden Pond 41 acres with Middlesex County deeds pictured were donated to the Massachusetts State Park system in 1922 by the Emerson family’s grandson and others.    


North Walden Pond 44 acres and surrounding pond land with adjacent shoreline, the setting of Henry David Thoreau’s ‘Walden’ was donated to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in 1922 by the Emerson family 13.50 acres, Forbes family 16.38 acres, and the Hoar family 13.6 acre North of the Pond water. These (43.48 acres) are shareholder George Wheeler Sr.’s Walden Pond 44 acres stockholds, North of the shoreline and Pond water.


The 1922 donations by the Heywood family were 7.59 acres East and by the Emerson family 33.1 acres South of the Walden Pond shoreline and pond water. 


The Emerson family 13.50 to 14 acres North of the Pond water and Emerson family 41 acres South of the pond water were not adjacent but separated by location North and South of Pond water. The total North and South Emerson 54.50 to 55 acres are often confused with the North George Wheeler Sr.’s Walden Pond 44 acres. Now the diagram above identifies the correct acreage, owner and location differences. 


States have no authority over Indian Treaty Land and Reservations Self-Executed by both Indian Treaty Parties and thus Ratified into Law. The land acquired by the Concord Puritans was equivalent to purchased stocks for their Incorporated Concord Township Company. 


Only U.S. Congress can modify, disestablish and regulate commerce of Indian Treaties, but they never have done so. Act VI, 2 Constitution = U.S. Congress = Indian Treaties, the 3 have the same authority; are above states' authority. The Sioux Indian Tribe was compensated $1 Billion in 2011 for unlawful mistakes that the Sioux disagreed that was too small compensation. Now is said up to $5 Billion. To emphasize how serious ‘the Law of the Land’ Indian Treaty violations are for either party to an Indian Treaty. 


Files coming soon.

Wrong Sovereign ALLOWED SALE AND 'TOOK' OF Walden pOND

   This reporter’s 9th Great-Grandfather George Wheeler Sr. was was an early settler of Concord, MA 1635 [Ancestry.com]; a Colonist, Incorporator and Stockholder of the Puritan Concord Massachusetts Bay Colony, 


"He appears to have been a person of some influence; his name appears often on town records and he was selectman in 1660. His house lot of 11 acres was at the (present) corner of Main and Walden Streets.  He owned a large amount of land in the center of the town and elsewhere and  also had land near the “frog-ponds” and at Walden Pond, and at Nut Meadow Brook.  His will was dated January 28, 1684 and presented for probate June 2, 1687. [Suffolk Prob. Reg. Vol. X fol. 1]. 


His sons Thomas and John were named coexecutors.  Capt Thomas died in 1687 from 1675 King Philip's War wounds and John was named sole executor.  John Wheeler passed the more attractive, at the time, Sovereign 16 acres Flint’s Pond land to his deceased brother Thomas Wheeler’s family to be passed in heritable sequence. John retained the Walden Pond 44 acres that during 1687 was a less useful dense forest.


Flint’s Pond became the site for 1836 Charles Stearns Wheeler-Henry David Thoreau Shanty. The will names “the children of his deceased son William, his sons Thomas and John, daughters Elizabeth Fletcher, Sarah Dudley, Ruth Hartwell and Hannah Fletcher, and the children of his daughter (married to surname) ‘Fox' “.  More recent references have provided  corrections made herein.  [Compiled by George Tolman in 1908 Revised editions 1970 and 1981 by Joseph C. Wheeler, for this online edition of 2006. Complete up to revision, 12 Oct 2016. Concord Free Public Library, Concord, Mass. Special Collections,]


Please see the photo above of the Midsection of George Wheeler Sr.'s Will 1684, probated 1687, documenting the Walden Pond and Flint's Pond bequeaths. George Wheeler Sr.'s entire will is in that section that follows in the Wheeler Ancestry section below. 


 George Wheler Sr.'s 1684 will and the ultimate destiny of Walden Pond and Flint's Pond in 2021 are most probably impacted by the SCOTUS, McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452, 2459 (2020) decision. 


15 Colonist Incorporator-Stockholders' Trialism  Indian Treaty  and Godliness:

6-square-mile ‘Musketaquid’ (Concord, MA ‘Native Indian Country’ name), the 'Pennacook Native Indian Nation’, including George Wheeler’s Walden Pond 44 acres and all other acres, 

  • were symbiotic, peaceful, cooperative Sovereign, Pennacook Native Indian'-Sovereign Puritan Concord,  Massachusetts Bay Colony Trialism  Indian Treaty  by means of 

  1. Puritan Concord Colonists' Colonization and Colonized Concord with Concord Massachusetts Bay Colony Crown Grant
  2. Puritan Concord Stockholder Purchase and purchased Concord with money, tools, health and safety form epidemics and living supplies and "compensation of the Native Indian inhabitants by bestowing on them Civilization and Puritan Trialism Godliness, 'Praying Town Reservations' in exchange for unlimited independence." [Indian Treaties, A Century of Lawmaking for a New Nation: U.S. Congressional Documents and Debates, 1774 – 1875, American Memory | Search All Collections | Collection Finder | Learning Page, The Library of Congress] 
  3.  a. “To accomplish that would  require  an act of cession, the transfer of a sovereign claim from   one nation to another. 3 [E. Washburn, American Law of Real Property *521–*524. And there is no reason why Congress cannot reserve land for tribes in much the same way, allowing them to continue to exercise governmental functions over land even if they no longer own it communally. §1151(a)’s plain terms. Cf. Seymour, 368 U. S., at 357–358.3 “Cession” is generally what a communal tribe does when it conveys communal land to a fellow communal 'Sovereign' , such as the 'Sovereign'  United States or another 'Sovereign' tribe. See [Mitchel v. U.S.,9 Pet.711,734 (1835); e.g.,1856  Indian Treaty ,Art.I,11Stat. 699.] Cession is like the  'Sovereign' Pennacook Native Indian Nation cedes ‘Musketaquid’ land after purchased to Puritan Stockholders forming 'Sovereign' Concord Nation.  Cession is  total surrender of all tribal interests.’ ” Nebraska v. Parker, 577 U. S. 481, ___–___ (2016) (slip op., at 6). [SCOTUS, McGirt v. Oklahoma (2020)] 'Sovereign' Pennacook Indian Nation transfer of land to 'Sovereign' Puritan Concord Nation. Sovereign Nation ceedes its Sovereignty to Sovereign Nation; transfer of power.


4. Puritan Concord Stockholder Incorporation Incorporated the Concord Company by

           assimilating their stockhold properties into their Incorporated Company aka the Sovereign Puritan Theocratic Concord ‘Nation’. 

  •   Puritan Holy 'Communal' Concord Massachusetts Bay Colony-Aborignal Pennacook Indian Trialism  Indian Treaty  was  consummated after ‘Musketaquid’ Indian land was Colonized,  Purchased  and Incorporated in fall of 1635.  In exchange,  the 'Pennacook Native Indian Nation’ received  'Praying Town Reservations' with schools, chuches, Indian ordained ministers, Indian conversions, Algonquin Indian language Bible, independence, civillity, health care and many more advantages and assets.
  •  1 Thessalonians 5:23 -  And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body (Puritan Trialism Holiness) be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. 


Massachusetts was not a state in 1635. Massachusetts passed through many intermediary stages i.e. Massachusetts Bay Colony 1628-1691, Revocation of Royal Charter 1684, Dominion of New England 1686 and dissolved 1689, Province of Massachusetts 1691,  before adopting a state Constitution in 1780 following the Revolutionary War  1775-83 and electing John Hancock as its 1st Governor. 


The Indian Removal Act was signed into law on May 28, 1830, by United States President Andrew Jackson. The law authorized the president to negotiate with southern Native American tribes for their removal to federal territory west of the Mississippi River in exchange for white settlement of their ancestral lands.   

  1. [The U.S. Senate passed the bill on April 24, 1830 (28–19), the U.S. House passed it on May 26, 1830 (102–97); Prucha, Francis Paul, The Great Father: The United States Government and the American Indians, Volume I, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1984, p. 206.
  2. [The Congressional Record; May 26, 1830; House vote No. 149; Government Tracker online; retrieved October 2015
  3. ["Indian Removal Act: Primary Documents of Americas History". Library of Congress. Retrieved May 12, 2011 [Wikipedia]


Following 1830 Indian Removal Act, many interested parties became involved and the negotiated  Indian Treatties and promises were made and repeatedly broken . From 1830 until SCOTUS McGrit v. Oklahoma 2020,  190 years, “the perils of substituting stories for statutes”, blundered a mess.....“we need look no further than the stories we are offered in the case before us.” 


"If anything should be recognized in the McGrit case is  the persistent unspoken message seems to be that SCOTUS should from the histories recognize the 'practical advantage' of ignoring the written law {for ~190 years}.  Ignoring the written law was much less troublesome. 


"The Defendant in this case, Oklahoma. is candid.  Oklahoma admits that the entire point of its reclassification exercise is to avoid ['Solem' Rule] [ Solem v. Bartlett, 465 U.S. 463 (1984), was a SCOTUS case involving Indian country jurisdiction] that only the U.S. Congress may (undo a Treaty) and disestablish a Reservation."...... "The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit used Solem to find that U.S. Congress did not explicitly disestablish these reservations,.[5] The decision of the Appeals Court was upheld by the United States Supreme Court in light of that courts judgement in McGirt v. Oklahoma (2020).[6] This means that Patrick Murphy could be retried in federal court.[7] 


 Diminishment commonly refers to the reduction in size of a reservation. A finding of diminishment generally suggests that a discrete, easily identifiable parcel of land has been removed from reservation status.[BIRKHOLD, MATTHEW H. "JUDGING "INDIAN CHARACTER"? THE SUPREME COURT'S OPPORTUNITY IN NEBRASKA V. PARKER" (PDF). Wisconsin Law Review. 

7 February 2017.] 


"Holding that the Creek Indian Tribe never had a Reservation, solemnly guarantied, permanent home, forever set apart, secured in the unrestricted right of self-government would, 'fee title' is somehow inherently incompatible with a Reservation status', Indian Tribes' fee title is valid [Maxey v. Wright 54, S. W. 807, 810, Indian Terr. 1900] and U.S. Congresses' repeated references to a 'Creek Reservation', would require SCOTUS to stand willfully blind before a host of federal statutes."   


"Simply put, the Enabling Act sent state-law cases to state court and federal-law cases to federal court and serious Indian crimes properly belonged in U.S. Federal Courts."


"The U.S. Federal Government (Congress) promised the Creek Indians a Reservation and U.S. Congress has never withdrawn (disestablished) a promised Reservation."......"If U.S. Congress wishes to withdraw (disestablish ) its promise of a Reservation it must say so, (with legislation). [SCOTUS McGrit v. Oklahoma 2020]


"The only question before us, however, concerns the statutory definition of “Indian Country” as it applies in federal criminal law under the MCA, 


"For the Indians, there never was any question that the land was theirs. The only question was whether it would be wise to part with some of it to obtain useful or beautiful things these new people from across the ocean offered. 


"It is likely many Native Americans did want to enter into a trade relationship with the Europeans. The Europeans brought several items they deemed of value. Iron artifacts in general and firearms in particular worked better than the alternatives used in tribal society. Glass products proved an adornment Native Americans found attractive. As long as the European population was small and the amount of land in question was minor, trading land for otherwise unobtainable goods, imporved conveience and living  was a reasonable decision.
 

"Although Natives never doubted they owned the land, the English were not so sure. In British legal theory the settlers had a “right” to settle found in the charter granted to the Colony by the
King. 


"The prevailing British legal view {{{and that of Concord Massachusetts Bay Colony based on their immediate land purchases}}} eventually became that Native Indians owned the land and had the right to be compensated if they surrendered control over it. 


"This was just as any traditional British landowner could expect when property changed hands. British settlers also came to the pragmatic conclusion that buying land was simpler and cheaper than trying to take it, an action that almost always led to war.


"Individual Indians sold land either directly to a Colonial Government {{{ like the Communal Concord Massachusetts Bay Colony whose individual stockholder settlers made specific land purchases but pooled the land-stocklholds  into an Incoportated Company }}} or to individual 

non-communal settlers who, at least theoretically, had a license to make such a purchase. {{{ NOT like the Communal Concord Massachusetts Bay Incorporated Colony }}}  The land market, however, was rife with fraud, usually, but not always perpetrated by the settlers on Indians. 


"The most blatant problem was squatters, who simply occupied Indian land or occupied or squatted on land that appeared unowned and unoccupied, Ignoring laws and British policies. Settlers and squatters simply started clearing the forest. [A Brief History of Land Transfers Between American Indians and the United States Government, Clarke Historical Library] | Mount Pleasant, MI 48859


Indian country” includes “all land within the limits of any Indian reservation under the jurisdiction of the United States Government.” §1151. [SCOTUS MCGIRT v. OKLAHOMA Opinion  Justice Gorsuch]


 “Reservation[s]” and “Indian allotments, the Indian titles to which have not been extinguished,” qualify as 'Indian Country' under subsections (a) and (c) of §1151. But “dependent Indian communities” also qualify as Indian  Cite as: 591 U. S. ____ (2020) 29 Opinion of the Court country under subsection (b). So Oklahoma lacks jurisdiction to prosecute Mr. McGirt whether the Creek lands happen to fall in one category or another. 

 

 "Colonial Aboriginal Indian Land title is established when a Indian Tribe occupies or possesses land  from a long time ago, and has ultimate authority to establish their law over other people  generally and continuity until foreign country occupies, conquests or purchases the land.  


 "The United States was the first to acknowledge the common law doctrine of aboriginal title (also known as "original Indian title" or "Indian right of occupancy"). 


 "States had lost the ability to extinguish aboriginal title with the ratification of the United States Constitution in 1788, which vested authority over commerce with American Indian tribes in the federal government. U.S. Congress codified this prohibition in the Nonintercourse Acts of 1790, 1793, 1796, 1799, 1802, and 1833. 


U.S. Constitution, Article  I, § 8, clause 3 provides:  [The U.S. Congress shall have Power] To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian tribes; 

 

Not only the state of Oklahoma, the 5 Civilized Tribes, their commerce, jurisdictions, land  and  Indian Treaties were impacted in the most recent case, SCOTUS McGrit v. Oklahoma, and the essential  Constitutional decisions were adopted. 


Similarly, the state's sale of Walden Pond and other commercial, jurisdictional, land, Indian Reservation and  Indian Treaty  inadvertent disestablishments have impacted the Aboriginal ‘Native Indian Country’, ‘Musketaquid’ (Concord, MA), Native Pennacook Indians and the same inadvertent disestablishments have impacted the Concord Massachusetts Bay Puritan Colorizations, Purchases and Stockholders' Incorporations. Similar Constitutional decisions are essential.

  • The states in our United States cannot regulate Aboriginal Indian commerce.
  • and states cannot disestablish Aboriginal Indian titles,  Indian Treaties, and jurisdictions
  • the state in which the Aboriginal Pennacook Native Indian reside cannot regulate Pennacook  commerce. 
  • the state in which the Pennacook Native Indian reside cannot disestablish Aboriginal Pennacook Native Indian Land titles,  Indian Treaties, and jurisdictions
  • the state, in which the 15 Puritan Colonists, Purchasers and Incorporators in 1635 agreed by Trialism  Indian Treaty  with the Aboriginal Pennacook Indians and 1. Colonized, 2. Purchased and 3. Incorporated the 6-square-miles of Concord Massachusetts Bay Colony including the Walden Pond 44 acres, (the property in question), and the Incorporators assimilated their stockholder properties and Incorporated in their Sovereign Puritan Theocratic Concord ‘Nation’ Company, cannot, disestablish the Trialism  Indian Treaty , disestablish Trialism  Indian Treaty ’s commerce and cannot disestablish Trialism  Indian Treaty ’s jurisdictions and cannot sale Trialism Treaty Lands and reservations.
  • Just as Oklahoma, the wrong Sovereign, convicted Jimmy McGrit.
  • The wrong Sovereign, allowed and recorded the sale of Walden Pond 44 Acres, part of the Sovereign Aboriginal Pennacook Native Indian Country sold in perpetuity to Incorporator George Wheeler Sr. in the Concord Trialism  Indian Treaty , that only U.S. Congress legislation could allow with a sale of Sovereign stockholders’ land disestablishing the Concord Trialism Treaty complex agreement. (SCOTUS McGrit v. Oklahoma).
  • Aboriginal Indian Treaty disestablishment is ‘out-of-bounds’ for states. The Complex detailed Concord Massachusetts Bay Colony ‘Trialism’  Indian Treaty  is no exception 


The constitution of the United States: Article I, Section 8, Clause 3: 1.3. Commerce with Indian Tribes “[The U.S. Congress shall have Power . . . ] To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes; . . .


U.S. Congress’s power to regulate commerce with the Indian tribes, once almost rendered superfluous by Court decision 1. has now been resurrected and made largely the basis for informing judicial judgment with respect to controversies concerning the rights and obligations of Native Americans. 


“Although U.S. Congress in 1871 forbade the further making of  Indian Treaties with Native American tribes 2. cases disputing the application of the old  Indian Treaties and especially their effects upon attempted state taxation and regulation of on-reservation activities continue to be a staple of the Court's docket. 3.  


“But this clause is one of the two bases now found sufficient to empower U.S. Government authority over Native Americans. The source of U.S. Government authority over Indian matters has been the subject of some confusion, but it is now generally recognized that the power derives from U.S. Government responsibility for regulating commerce with Indian tribes and  Indian Treaty  making. 4. 


“In a case of major import for the settlement of Indian land claims, the Court ruled in County of Oneida v. Oneida Indian Nation, 23. that an Indian tribe may obtain damages for wrongful possession of land conveyed in 1795 without the federal approval required by the Nonintercourse Act. 24. 


“The Nonintercourse Act reflected the accepted principle that extinguishment of  the title to land by Native Americans required the consent of the United States Congress and left intact a tribe's common-law remedies to protect possessory rights. 


“The Court reiterated the accepted rule that enactments are construed liberally in favor of Native Americans and that U.S. Congress may disestablish Indian treaty rights or extinguish aboriginal land title only if it does so clearly and unambiguously. 


“Consequently, U.S. Congress approval of land-conveyance  Indian Treaties containing references to earlier conveyances that had violated the Nonintercourse Act did  not constitute ratification of the invalid conveyances. 25. 


“Similarly, the Court refused to apply the general rule for borrowing a state statute of limitations for the U.S. Congress common-law action, and it rejected  the dissent's view that, given the extraordinary passage of time, the doctrine of laches should have been applied to bar the claim. 26./

[Constitution Annotated, Congress.cov, Library of Congress https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI_S8_C3_1_3/]


The of wrong Sovereign, the state of Oklahoma, convicted Jimmy McGirt.; decision penned by Justice Gorsuch. [SCOTUS, McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452, 2459 (2020)]

 

"The U.S. Supreme Court’s oral arguments were streamed online with all justices and counsel participating remotely due to COVID-19 restrictions.


"Several justices, including one from the court’s liberal wing, appeared reluctant to issue a decision that would dramatically upend longstanding legal practice in Oklahoma.


"Associate Justice Clarence Thomas noted prior court cases cited by McGirt’s legal team focused on the disposition of surplus land.


“Here, of course, there’s much, much more being done, a whole series of statutes involving both sovereignty and the allotment of land,” Thomas said.


"Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg noted that federal penalties “are at least as harsh as the state’s” and due-process rights are provided in both court systems.


“How are you harmed by the fact that you were tried in the state court rather than the federal court when you’re exposed to the same—at least the same—penalties in both?” Ginsburg asked.


 Ian Heath Gershengorn, an attorney representing McGirt  said the different venues would involve different juror pools, but that potential penalties do not matter when a defendant is required to submit to the wrong court system.


In contrast to Ginsburg’s line of questioning, Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor said federal penalties may be greater in some instances than those imposed in state court, so “some defendants who would be entitled to challenge their convictions would choose not to, because the risk would be too high for them.”


"But Ginsburg also asked about the broader ramifications that would occur if the court sides with McGirt. “What makes this case hard is that there have been hundreds—hundreds—of prosecutions, some very heinous offenses, under state law,” Ginsburg said. “On your view, it would all become undone.” She noted that those prosecutions included individuals convicted of “murder, for terrible sexual offenses.”


“These would all have to be done years later when the witnesses may not be there anymore,” Ginsburg said. [U.S. Supreme Court hears arguments in Oklahoma ‘reservation’ case

May 11, 2020 Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs (OCPA),  by Ray Carter, Director, Center for Independent Journalism

 JUSTICE GORSUCH delivered the opinion of the Court: 

"On the far end of the Trail of Tears was a promise. Forced to leave their ancestral lands in Georgia and Alabama, the Creek Nation received assurances that their new lands in the West would be secure forever. 


"In exchange for ceding “all their land, East of the Mississippi river,” the U. S. government agreed by  Indian Treaty  that “[t]he Creek country west of the Mississippi shall be solemnly guarantied to the Creek Indians.”  Indian Treaty  With the Creeks, Arts. I, XIV, Mar. 24, 1832, 7 Stat. 366, 368 (1832 Treaty). 


"Both parties settled on boundary lines for a new and “permanent home to the whole Creek nation,” located in what is now Oklahoma.  Indian Treaty  With the Creeks, preamble, Feb. 14, 1833, 7 Stat. 418 (1833  Indian Treaty ). 


"The U.S. government further promised that “[no] State or Territory [shall] ever have a right to pass laws for the government of such Indians, but they shall be allowed to govern themselves.” 1832  Indian Treaty , Art. XIV, 7 Stat. 368. 


Today we are asked whether the land these  Indian Treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because U.S. Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word.  


How then is George Wheler Sr.'s 1684 will and the ultimate destiny of Walden Pond and Flint's Pond in 2021 most probably impacted by the SCOTUS, McGirt v. Oklahoma ? 


 George Wheeler Sr. and his bequeathed and descendant family owned and naturally preserved the Indian Treaty North Walden Pond 44 acres from 1635 – 1845.

  
During the 1841 Preemption ('Squatting') Law misconception, unbeknown to the Wheeler family, in 1844 the historic  Emerson-Thoreau Cabin (Shanty)  located on  13.50 to 14 acres of George Wheeler Sr.'s North Walden Pond 44 acres, were sold by "Squatter" Thomas Wyman or his estate to the good-intentioned Ralph Waldo Emerson, apparently from the confusion.

 
The 1845 deed, pictured in this report, was recorded in Middlesex County, Massachusetts and was for The South Walden Pond 41 acres that were sold by James Heywood to  Abel Moore and John Hosmer who sold the South Walden Pond 41 acres to Ralph Waldo Emerson 1845 deed Book 473, pp. 351-353, Middlesex County, Massachusetts 1845.  That deed was recorded for the  legitimate purchase of the South Walden Pond 41 acres. 


Emerson-Thoreau Cabin (Shanty) unauthorized Wheeler 13.50 to 14 acres  located in  George Wheeler Sr.'s North Walden Pond 44 acres and 2 other family sections with no Middlesex County deeds and the South Walden Pond 41 acres with Middlesex County deeds pictured were donated to the Massachusetts State Park system in 1922 by the Emerson family’s grandson and others.    


North Walden Pond 44 acres and surrounding pond land with adjacent shoreline, the setting of Henry David Thoreau’s ‘Walden’ was donated to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in 1922 by the Emerson family 13.50 acres, Forbes family 16.38 acres, and the Hoar family 13.6 acre North of the Pond water. These (43.48 acres) are shareholder George Wheeler Sr.’s Walden Pond 44 acres stockholds, North of the shoreline and Pond water.


The 1922 donations by the Heywood family were 7.59 acres East and by the Emerson family 33.1 acres South of the Walden Pond shoreline and pond water. 


The Emerson family 13.50 acres North of the Pond water and Emerson family 33.1 acres South of the pond water were not adjacent but separated by location North and South of Pond water. The total N and S Emerson 46.6 acres are often confused with the North George Wheeler Sr.’s Walden Pond 44 acres. Now the diagram identifies the correct acreage, owner and location differences. 


 Justice Gorsuch opinion: "At another level, then, Mr. McGirt’s case winds up as a contest between State and Tribe......   U.S. Congress authorized the President “to assure the tribe . . . that the United States will forever secure and guaranty to them . . . the 'country' so exchanged with them.” Indian Removal Act of 1830, §3, 4 Stat. 412. “[A]nd if they prefer it,” the bill continued, “the United States will cause a patent or grant to be made and executed to them for the same; Provided always, that such lands shall revert to the United States, if the Indians become extinct, or abandon the same.” Ibid. I.” 1833  Indian Treaty , preamble, 7 Stat. 418. f agreeable to all sides, a tribe would not only enjoy the government’s solemn  Indian Treaty  promises; it would hold legal title to its lands. It was an offer the Creek accepted. The 1833 T Indian Treaty  fixed borders for what was to be a “permanent home to the whole Creek nation of Indians.  1833 Treaty, preamble, 7 Stat. 418.  


"If not for the Tribe’s fee title to its land, no one would question that these  Indian Treaties and statutes created a Reservation.......  The only question before us, however, concerns the statutory definition of “Indian country” as it applies in federal criminal law under the MCA......................  The federal government promised the Creek Indians a Reservation in perpetuity. ...... U.S. Congress has never withdrawn the promised Reservation.  


 "The dissent.. assures us, without further elaboration, that the consequences will be “drastic precisely because they depart from . . . more than a century [of] settled understanding.” Post, at 37. The prediction is a familiar one.


 "Many other legal doctrines—procedural bars, res judicata, statutes of repose, and laches, to name a few—are designed to protect those who have reasonably labored under a mistaken understanding of the law. And it is precisely because those doctrines exist that we are “fre[e] to say what we know to be true . . . today, while leaving questions about . . . reliance interest[s] for later proceedings crafted to account for them.” Ramos, 590 U. S., at ___ (plurality opinion) (slip op., at 24).   


"If U.S. Congress wishes to withdraw its promises, it must say so. Unlawful acts, performed long enough and with sufficient vigor, are never enough to amend the law. To hold otherwise would be to elevate the most brazen and longstanding injustices over the law, both rewarding wrong and failing those in the right. The judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma is Reversed.  


The wrong Sovereign, the Commonwealth State of Massachusetts, deed recorded in Middlesex County, allowed the mistaken sale and transfer of George Wheeler Sr.'s Sovereign incorporated Walden Pond 44 acres, Company stockhold,' Indian Treaty Lands',  to Ralph Waldo Emerson by land agents, not by the bequeathed George Wheeler family, and, therefore, the inadvertent disestablishment of the  Concord including George Wheeler’s Walden Pond 44 acres were a Sovereign, symbiotic, peaceful, cooperative land purchases by means of Native Indian Treaties. -Sovereign Pennacook Native Indian Treaty and the  disestablishments of Pennecook Indian Commerce, Reservations and other Obligations.


 Justice Gorsuch penned and explained the decision SCOTUS McGirt v. Oklahoma 2020 and clarified years of controversy concerning Native American Indian Treaties, jurisdictions, definition of Indian Country, role of U.S. Congress and much more.

  • U.S. Constitution, written in 1787, ratified in 1788, and been in operation since 1789:
  • “States do not have authority to reduce federal Reservations lying within their borders.”
  • gives U.S. Congress the authority to regulate commerce with Native American Indians
  • establishes that federal Indian Treaties and statutes are the “supreme Law of the Land.” Art. I, §8; Art. VI, cl. 2. It.
  • “Clearly reaffirms and reassures all obligations of  Indian Treaty  stipulations Cf. Art. XII, id., at 790
  • Only U.S. Congress can:
  • disestablish and regulate Native American Indian Nation Treaties, Lands and Statutes
  • determine whether a Tribe continues to have a Reservation
  • disestablish a Native American Indian Reservation
  • are no Acts of Congress for Reservation divestments of land and diminishments of boundaries.
  • “If U.S. Congress wants to break their promises for Reservations, Congress must say so” and U.S. Congress never has.
  • “Unlawful acts, mere continuance, performed long enough and with sufficient determination, are never sufficient to inadvertently amend the law.”
  • This reporter’s 9th Great-Grandfather George Wheeler Sr. was an Incorporator and stockholder of the Puritan Concord Massachusetts Bay Colony, who arrived 1635 in Concord, MA
  • ‘Musketaquid’ (Concord, MA Indian name) was a Pennacook Native Indian ‘Nation’, ‘Indian Country’
  • Pennacook were an independent Sovereign Spiritual Conquest Government established by “acquisition of ‘Musketaquid’ with force after a victorious war many years before 1635
  • One of the main reasons for the Pennacook  Indian Treaty  with the Puritans was the recent Smallpox Epidemic that devastated the Pennacook population from thousands to 500. Possibly the historically spiritual Pennacook eagerly accepted the Puritans' religion.  Possibly the Pennecook believed they were forsaken by their spiritual beliefs.
  • 15 family Incorporator-Stockholders-of Concord Massachusetts Bay Colony in 1635  colonized and purchased ‘6-mile square Concord- Sovereign Nation’. see historic Concord signs in photo gallery above.
  • Concord was a Colony with 15 Crown Grant Incorporators, who at the same time, were 15 shrewd ‘Theocratic Concord Sovereign Nation’ Stockholders
  • George Wheeler Sr.’s Stockholder purchases included selected and acquired Walden Pond 44 acres and Flint’s Pond 16 acres and several other properties from Pennacook Indians’ Musketaquid ‘Nation’ itemized in George Wheeler Sr. 1664 will.

  

“ GEORGE WHEELER SR., who first appears in the Concord records in 1635 [Ancestry.com]. His signature is on many documents of Concord, attesting to his prominence in local affairs. He was wealthy and ended up with many parcels of land, including most of Reverend  Peter Buckeley’s estate. . GEORGE WHEELER SR. lived on an 11 acre parcel in the center of town, nowadays corner of Main Street and Walden, on the south side of the mill pond and the east side of Main Street stretching almost to Thoreau St. His lengthy will goes on-and-on as he lists many different parcels and designates which of his three sons should receive each parcel. To his five daughters and his grandchildren he gave only money”


Family named Streets in Concord: Meriam Rd, Fox Ln, Davis Ct, Heywood St, Hubbard St, Prescott St,, Peter Bulkeley Rd.,  Wheeler St,  Wheeler Ln (Acton)


  • ["The genealogical and encyclopedic history of the Wheeler family" by Albert G. Wheeler Jr, 1914]
  • ["The Wheeler Families of Old Concord, Mass", George Tolman, 1908]
  • ["A Fox Family History", Kevin A. Fox, 2014]
  • ["Concord: Climate for Freedom", Ruth R. Wheeler, 1967]
  • ["History of Concord, Mass Vol 1" by Alfred Sereno Hudson]
  • ["A history of the town of Concord, Middlesex County, Mass" by Lemuel Shattuck]

5 Colonist Incorporator-Stockholders' Trialism  Indian Treaty  and Godliness:

6-square-mile ‘Musketaquid’ (Concord, MA ‘Native Indian Country’ name), the 'Pennacook Native Indian Nation’, including George Wheeler’s Walden Pond 44 acres and all other acres, 

  • were symbiotic, peaceful, cooperative Sovereign, Pennacook Native Indian'-Sovereign Puritan Concord,  Massachusetts Bay Colony Trialism  Indian Treaties by means of 

  1. Puritan Concord Colonists' Colorization and Colonized Concord with Concord Massachusetts Bay Colony Crown Grant
  2. Puritan Concord Stockholder Purchase and purchased Concord with money, tools, health and safety form epidemics and living supplies and "compensation of the Native Indian inhabitants by bestowing on them Civilization and Puritan Trialism Godliness, 'Praying Town Reservations' in exchange for unlimited independence." [Indian Treaties, A Century of Lawmaking for a New Nation: U.S. Congressional Documents and Debates, 1774 – 1875, American Memory | Search All Collections | Collection Finder | Learning Page, The Library of Congress]
  3. Puritan Concord Stockholder Incorporation Incorporated the Concord Company by assimilating their stockhold properties into their Incorporated Company aka the Sovereign Puritan Theocratic Concord ‘Nation’. 

  • Concord was Colonized,  Purchased  and Incorporated in the fall of 1635.
  •  1 Thessalonians 5:23 -  And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body (Puritan Trialism Godliness) be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. 


  • Concord was defined a ‘Nation’ because Concord Massachusetts Bay Colony not only colonized but was an independent stockholder Company that purchased Concord, unlike other simply Incorporator Colonies. Concord Lands were their stockholds.
  • Theocratic Puritans settled ‘Musketaquid’ not seeking wealth, but with money and wealth
  • The Incorporator-Stockholders departed England framed in ‘good riddance’ with a Crown Grant from King Charles I, who was framed in ‘good riddance’ and who was embattled in an England Civil War and inevitably beheaded and dethroned in 1649
  • but Incorporator-Stockholders consummated ‘Musketaquid’ acquisition ridding themselves of problematic King Charles I with money and land purchases following brilliant entrepreneurial advisement, which was codified by Governor Winthrop
  • The Incorporator-Stockholders intentions were for Puritan Theocratic Concord, not a Crowned Colony, and Peaceful Concordance, Cooperation, Symbiosis and Conversion of Native Indians to Protestantism by Purchase and ‘Nation building’ and  Indian Treaty -with the Pennacook Native American Indian Nation
  • Sovereign ‘Nation’ to Sovereign ‘Nation’ intention and agreement establishing Sovereign Theocratic Concord and Sovereign Theocratic Praying-Town Pennacook Indian Reservations
  • George Wheeler Sr.’s descendants married philosophically like-minded Long Island’s William Jayne I’s (General Oliver Cromwell’s Chaplain) descendants who together established Concord, KY 1805, now a ghost town outside Paintsville, and Concord Church, now thriving, closer to town. The only evidence of the Concord, KY settlement is the lonely gravesite and DAR Revolutionary Soldier marker of Jesse Wheeler.


George Wheeler Sr.’s will 1684 and probate 1687 of record, readily available, bequeathed Walden Pond 44 acres and Flints’ Pond 16 acres to his 2 sons, Thomas and John.

  • Captain Thomas Wheeler died in 1687 from 1675 King Philip's War wounds.
  • John Wheeler became sole executor and passed the more attractive, at the time, Sovereign Flint’s Pond land to his deceased brother Thomas Wheeler’s family to be passed in heritable sequence
  • Flint’s Pond became the site for 1836 Charles Stearns Wheeler-Henry David Thoreau Shanty.
  • Prodigy Charles Stearns Wheeler, Thomas’ descendant, built the Shanty on Flint's Pond, the family’s inherited property.
  • Thoreau was denied shanty construction on Flint’s Pond which was evidence that Wheeler properties had careful oversight and not abandoned.
  • This reporter has 25 Wheeler relatives buried in Concord’s Old Hill Cemetery alone and many more in other cemeteries indicating years of continuous Concord residence and property supervision.
  • “Historians have widely accepted that Thoreau got his idea to build his 1845 Thoreau-Emerson Shanty on Walden Pond land from his editing, pontification and research experiences at 1836 Charles Stearns Wheeler-Thoreau Shanty.
  • Charles Stearns Wheeler was a Harvard classmate of Henry David Thoreau and an excellent editor and was admired by authors Thoreau, Emerson, Tennyson and Thomas Carlyle for whom he edited.
  • Sole executor John Wheeler retained the bequeathed 44 acres of Walden Pond, which became more historically Emerson and Thoreau relevant later.
  • John’s son Ebenezer Wheeler Sr. resided in Concord and managed his and John’s land-stock-assets.
  • Ebenezer Wheeler Sr. and several Incorporator stockholders purchased ‘Hassanamisco’, originally a portion of the Nipmuck Indian Country which became Grafton, MA and created another ‘Indian Praying Town Indian Reservation’ where ‘Missionary to the Indians, John Eliot, 1663 printed the first Bible in U.S. in Algonquin Indian language, convincing evidence of the community’s Godliness.


The wrong Sovereign, Middlesex County, Commonwealth State of Massachusetts, 

  • allowed the mistaken sale and transfer of 'Indian Treaty Lands' by the state of Massachusetts, 
  • even though states were not allowed to disestablish  Indian Treaty ies and Indian Commerce,
  • but allowed the sale of formerly 'Indian Treaty Lands' by Human agents  to well respected Ralph Waldo Emerson in 1845, 
  •  formerly George Wheeler Sr.’s  'Indian Treaty Lands', Walden Pond 44 stockhold-acres,
  • formerly Native Pennacook 'Indian Nation Lands' before George Wheeler Sr., 
  • that were acquired by George Wheeler Sr. when swapped for Puritan Theocratic 
  • a. George Wheeler Sr.’s Walden Pond property was never mentioned, considered or remunerated in Concord Library Wheeler papers
  • b. Wheeler deeds for the sale and transfer of George Wheeler Sr.'s  Walden Pond 44                         stockhold-acres by his heirs and family have never been found in Concord, MA Library Wheeler papers;  
  • c.  deeds for the sale George Wheeler Sr.’s 'Indian Treaty Lands' by his heirs and family have not been found in Concord Wheeler papers and many other sources.
  • d. Disestablishment of Native Pennacook Indian trades and commerce and Disestablishment of Native Pennacook Indian Treaties by U.S. Congress have never been found in  Concord, MA Library Wheeler papers;
  • The concepts of Stock and Stockholds. were not unknown in 1635. "The first stock market began in Amsterdam in 1611, Dutch East and West India Companies occupation of new lands were vigorously traded. America didn't operate stock markets until the late 1700s. But educated, wealthy English Puritans most certainly understood the concepts Dutch East and West India Companies occupation of new lands" and possibly invested and possibly considered Dutch East and West foreign land and evidence suggest that English Puritans learned from Amsterdam's' stock market, that for the importance for Sovereignty,  land purchase of foreign lands was absolutely necessary and more easily proved. [A Brief History of the Stock Market, Jan 8, 2021, SOFI Learn].
  •  "The Providence Company or Providence Island Company was an English chartered company founded in 1629 by twenty Puritan shareholders  in the Company.  


Treaty agreements received by  the Pennacook Indians: 

  • a. money, tools, health and safety form epidemics and living supplies, 
  • The Concord Puritans
  • b. 'Praying Indian town' Peaceful Concordance, Cooperation, Symbiosis 
  • Very important to Tan, Brown and Black Native Indians were Freedom and Naturalism. Puritan religious ideology significantly influenced Black activism and abolitionist rhetoric in Massachusetts. This referenced research of Puritanism and Black abolitionists provides scholars with a new understanding of the foundations of African American intellectual history and the origins of the antislavery movement in Puritan Massachusetts [The Puritan Origins of Black Abolitionism in Massachusetts, by Christopher Cameron,  Historical Journal of Massachusetts, Vol. 39 (1 & 2), Summer 2011, Institute for Massachusetts Studies, Westfield State University 80 Historical Journal of Massachusetts, Summer 2011] 
  • c. and Conversion of Native Indians to Protestantism 
  • d. fortification of Native Indians with Godliness and willful evolution of Native Indian Souls,
  • and other stock-swaps, less evident
  • Only the U.S. Congress, not the Commonwealth State of Massachusetts,  can disestablish an Indian Treaty and disestablish Indian Commerce., 
  • but the U.S. Congress has never legislated such  disestablishments. [SCOTUS McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452, 2459 (2020) ] 


The deed now questioned was recorded in Middlesex County, Massachusetts deed book 473, pages 351 to 353.

  • Even though there are deed irregularities, the deed was never contested, possibly because of misinformation after U.S. Congress had just passed Squatter Law 1841. 
  • Many Squatters attempted Walden Pond territory. They were documented in Thoreau’s ‘Walden’ Originally published, August 9, 1854, 9 years after Emerson’s Walden Pond ‘purchase’.
  • Thoreau admitted he and others were Walden Pond ‘squatters’, contemptuous implications for want-to-be Walden Pond landowners and for his Emerson relationship.
  • “Thoreau was not interested in making a good impression on others and did not care to correct false impressions. Thoreau's strong individualism, rejection of the conventions of society, and philosophical idealism all distanced him from others. He had no desire to meet external expectations if they varied from his own sense of how to live his life.” 
  •  “Emerson, in his faultfinding eulogy of Thoreau, wrote: Had his genius been only contemplative, he had been fitted to his life, but with his energy and practical ability he seemed born for great enterprise and for command; and I so much regret the loss of his rare powers of action, that I cannot help counting it a fault in him that he had no ambition. Wanting this, instead of engineering for all America, he was the captain of a huckleberry-party.” [Henry David Thoreau Thoreau's Reputation and Influence, Clifton Keith Hillegass’ CliffsNotes]
  • There appears a demonstrable success-less ‘chip on Thoreau’s’ shoulder’, including his Transcendentalism interpretation. 
  • The 1845 Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ deed inadvertently disestablished, but not by U.S. Congress, the Pennacook Native American Indian Nation Land Purchase by George Wheeler Sr. and Indian Treaty.
  • Native Indian Sovereign Nation  Indian Treaties have never heretofore SCOTUS McGirt v. Oklahoma been disestablished by U.S. Congress legislation and should today be completely functional. (SCOTUS McGirt v. Oklahoma 2020 Justice Gorsuch penned decision].
  • ·n 1922 approximately 80 acres surrounding Walden Pond were donated by ‘owner’ families to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts with a Walden Environmental ‘Preservation Stipulation” and well-deserved Emerson and Thoreau Histories ‘Preservation Stipulation”.
  • But the important George Wheeler Sr. history and his Walden Pond 44 acres original ownership beginning in 1635 and the Wheeler family history have been neglected.
  • George Wheeler Sr.’s history and the Wheeler family well-deserved histories deserve their important places in Concord, MA history and current Walden Pond State Reservation Information and gift repositories if those entities are continued.
  • Furthermore, Walden Pond State Reservation Land and Water desperately need improved Preservation, less pollution, less contamination and much improved Healthy Pond Water Safeness. Presently it is "swim at your own risk."  Few probably know their own risks ! Pathological pond water Algae Blum can be extremely dangerous, not to mention urine, mercury and others.


  • [McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452, 2459 (2020) SCOTUS]
  • [Harvard Law review, Indian Law, ,McGirt v. Oklahoma, Leading Case : 140 S. Ct. 2452        (2020) Nov 10,   2020, 134 Harv. L. Rev. 600]
  •  [ The Wheeler Families of Old Concord, Massachusetts, compiled by George Tolman in 1908, Revised    editions 1970, 1981 and Joseph C. Wheeler online edition of 2006. This online edition is complete up to the Joseph's revision, 12 October 2016. Concord Free Public Library, Concord, MA]
  •  (August 1862 issue of Atlantic Monthly)

Files coming soon.

Wrong Sovereigns International Law

  In international law Nation is the term for a Sovereign Territory

Sovereign Concord Massachusetts Bay Colony contained the 4 sovereignty characteristics: 

  • Incorporated 1. territory 
  • Puritan 2. population 
  • Theocratic Governmental 3. authority 
  • and 4. recognition by other Sovereignties.[“Sovereign", The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (4th ed.), Houghton Mifflin Company, 2004, retrieved 21 February 2010, “adj. 1. Self-governing; independent: a sovereign state.”] ["sovereign", The New Oxford American Dictionary (2nd ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005, ISBN 978-0-19-517077-1, “adjective ... [ attrib. ] (of a nation or state) fully independent and determining its own affairs.”]


“In political science, a Colony is a Territory subject to a form of foreign rule.[1] 

“Though dominated by foreign Colonizers, Colonies remain separate from the administration of the original country of the colonizers, the metropolitan state (or "mother country"). 


“This Administrative Colonial Separation makes Colonies neither Incorporated Territories, nor Client States.  Some Colonies have been organized either as Dependent Territories that are not sufficiently Self-Governed, or as Self-Governed Colonies controlled by Colonists i.e. Colonial Settlers.


“The word Nation came from the Old French word nacion – meaning "birth" (naissance), "place of origin" -, which in turn originates from the Latin word natio(nātĭō) literally meaning "birth".[11]

“Black's Law Dictionary defines Nation as follows: Nation, n. (14c) 

  1. A large group of people having a common origin, language, and tradition and usu. constituting a Political Entity. When a nation is coincident with a state, the term Nation-State is often used....
  2. “A community of people inhabiting a defined territory and organized under an independent government; a sovereign political state....[1]


The word "Nation" is sometimes used as synonym for: State (polity) or sovereign state: a government which controls a specific territory, which may or may not be associated with any particular ethnic group 


Country: a geographic territory, which may or may not have an affiliation with a government or ethnic group


“Thus the phrase "Nations of the World" could be referring to the top-level governments (as in the name for the United Nations), various large geographical territories, or various large ethnic groups of the planet.


“Depending on the meaning of "Nation" used, the term "Nation State" could be used to distinguish larger states from small city states, or could be used to distinguish multinational states from those with a single ethnic group.


In his article, "The Mosaic Moment: An Early Modernist Critique of the Modernist Theory of Nationalism", Philip S. Gorski argues that the first modern nation was the Dutch Republic, created by a fully modern Political Nationalism rooted in the model of Biblical Nationalism.[17] In a 2013 article "Biblical Nationalism and the sixteenth-century states", Diana Muir Appelbaum expands Gorski's argument to apply to a series of new, Protestant, sixteenth-century Nation States.[18] A similar, albeit broader, argument was made by Anthony D. Smith in his books, Chosen Peoples: Sacred Sources of National Identity and Myths and Memories of the Nation.[19]


In her book Nationalism: Five Roads to Modernity, Liah Greenfeld argued that Nationalism was invented in England by 1600. According to Greenfeld, England was “the first Nation in the World".[20][21]


“International law defines Sovereign States as having a permanent population, defined territory, one government and the capacity to enter into relations with other sovereign states.[1] 

“It is also normally understood that a Sovereign State is independent. [2] According to the declarative theory of statehood, a Sovereign State can exist without being recognized by other sovereign states.[3][4]  


Unrecognized States will often find it difficult to exercise full Treaty-Making powers or engage in diplomatic relations with other Sovereign states.


“Sovereignty is the supreme authority within a territory.[1][2] Sovereignty entails hierarchy within the state, as well as external autonomy for states.[3] In any state, Sovereignty is assigned to the person, body, or institution that has the ultimate authority over other people in order to establish a law or change an existing law.[2] In political theory, Sovereignty is a substantive term designating supreme legitimate authority over some polity.[4] In international law, Sovereignty is the exercise of power by a state. 


  • “De Jure Sovereignty refers to the legal right to do so; 
  • de FactoSovereignty refers to the factual ability to do so. 
  • This can become an issue of special concern upon the failure of the usual expectation that de Jure and de Facto Sovereignty exist at the place and time of concern, and reside within the same organization.

========================

“Concord was incorporated in the fall of 1635. GEORGE WHEELER SR., who first appears in the Concord records in 1635 [Ancestry.com]. His signature is on many documents of Concord, attesting to his prominence in local affairs. He was wealthy and ended up with many parcels of land, including most of Reverend  Peter Buckeley’s estate. . GEORGE WHEELER SR. lived on an 11 acre parcel in the center of town, nowadays corner of Main Street and Walden, on the south side of the mill pond and the east side of Main Street stretching almost to Thoreau St. His lengthy will goes on-and-on as he lists many different parcels and designates which of his three sons should receive each parcel. To his five daughters and his grandchildren he gave only money”


Family named Streets in Concord: Meriam Rd, Fox Ln, Davis Ct, Heywood St, Hubbard St, Prescott St, Wheeler St, Peter Bulkeley Rd., Wheeler Ln (Acton)


Bibliography (most of these books can be downloaded and read from Google Books):

  • "The genealogical and encyclopedic history of the Wheeler family" by Albert G. Wheeler Jr, 1914
  • "The Wheeler Families of Old Concord, Mass", George Tolman, 1908
  • "A Fox Family History", Kevin A. Fox, 2014
  • "Concord: Climate for Freedom", Ruth R. Wheeler, 1967
  • "History of Concord, Mass Vol 1" by Alfred Sereno Hudson
  • "A history of the town of Concord, Middlesex County, Mass" by Lemuel Shattuck

Files coming soon.
Files coming soon.

Will of George Wheeler, Sr.,1684

 Will of George Wheeler

George Wheeler, of Town End & Concord

“The circumstantial evidence of his having been the brother of Timothy Wheeler and of Captain Thomas Wheeler is of the highest order. The English records make it quite clear that George Wheeler had a brother Thomas and Thomas is clearly proven to have been a brother of Timothy. With Timothy he owned considerable property jointly, and together they were in possession of most of the real estate left by the Rev. Peter Bulkeley. Authorities agree that George Wheeler came to Concord about the year 1636 with his wife Katherine and several children. Walcott in his History of Concord asserts that he was one of the few men who "were foremost in the town's business, by virtue of their large estates as well as their integrity and good judgment. He was a man of education, and the owner of a large amount of property, his house lot alone consisting of 11 acres, while he possessed lands in every part of the town, at Brook Meadows, Fairhaven Meadow, the Cranefield, by Walden Goose Pond, Flint's Pond, on the White Pond Plain, on the Sudbury line, etc. He held as many positions of trust and was as active in the direction of the town's affairs as any individual in Concord, serving at various times on substantially every committee of consequence, and leading in all matters of moment, as is evidenced by the fact that nearly every town deed and petition of any importance from either the Church or the civic community of that time bears his signature. His will, which is given here, is dated January 28, 1684-5 and was admitted to probate June 2, 1687, thus establishing the approximate time of his death.

.

“He held as many positions of trust and was as active in the direction of the town's affairs as any individual in Concord, serving at various times on substantially every committee of consequence, and leading in all matters of moment, as is evidenced by the fact that nearly every town deed and petition of any importance from either the Church or the civic community of that time bears his signature.

========


Will of George Wheeler, Sr.,1684

I George Wheeler Senior in the Town of Concord in the County of Middlesex in the Massachusetts Colony in New England being in a confident measure of memory & understanding : praised be God : doe make this my last Will & Testament in manner and forme as follows:

loweth: First: My soul I commite to God y* gave it me believing in the Lord Jesus Christ my onely Lord & Savior who will raise my body att the last & great day to life eternall: & my body to decent buryall: first: I will y* my due debts be honebly paid & funnerall charges satisfied: for my temprall estate as foUoweth: first I will that my whole estate shall stande engaged & be responseable for my comfortable maintenance in all respects during the term of my life: & as to my funnerall charges to be borne by my whole estate also the charges of execution & all court confirmation and enroulment be borne by my whole estate: I will to my two sons Thomas Wheeler & John Wheeler my mansion dwelling house barns cow houses & orchards with y* part of the home lot joyning to said house & orchards down to the cross fence y* stood cross ye sd lot in equall right of p'"priety the lower part of sd lot down to John Scorthford house I give to my son Thomas & y* part of my lot lying between Joshua Wheeler & John Scorthford I give to my son John: I give to my two sons Thomas & John my six acers bought of Gershon Bulkeley lying over the hills equally in right: also I give to my sons Thomas & John my twenty eight acers of woodland lying in the north quarter over the river equall in right: also I give to the children of my son William, deceased as a legacy out of my estate the sume of sixty six pounds seven shillings to be paid to them by the executors of this my will in equall right of propriety onely my will is y* my medow at brooke medow on both sides of the brook excepting y* p*^ I give to my son Thomas as also my one acer in ash swamp at Fairehaven: be by the executors of this my will be dispoossed of to my son Williams children & to be as pte of y® above sd legacy: also the two acers & a halfe of a medow on the northwest side of the brake at brooke medow joyning to my son Williams pastor it is not my said son Williams but I will it to my executors to administer upon it as my estate: I give to my son Thomas my piece of medow at Brooke medow joyning to John Wheeler medow lying on the northwest side of the brooke three acers more or less: I give to my son John my two acers & a halfe of medow in spring medow more or less : I give to my two sones Thomas & John my medow in ye medow called the great medow with my pte of the post in equall right: I give to my son John my fourteen acers at the south field on the east side of the Country way againt Compe's house also two acers in muddy medow swamp: I give to my sons Thomas & John my fourty four acers lying north of Waldon Pond in equall right : I give to my son Thomas my fourteen acers lying on the southeast of the south river joyning to Nathaniel & John Billings I give to my son John my six acers joyning to Daniel Dane southeast from mount Taber: I give to my Sones Thomas & John my eight acers joyning to Mr. Flints pond lying by the east quarter lyne in equall right : I give to my son John my four acers in John Mills pastor joyning to the south river: also I give to my two sons Thomas & John out of my moveable estate five pounds a piece: I give to my son Thomas ten pounds out of my moveable estate in consideration he is short of his brothers in receit of parts (msg) give to my daughter ifoxes children six pounds equall amongst them: I give to my four daughters Elizabeth Fletcher, Sarah Dudly, Ruth Hartwell & Hanah Fletcher the sume of fifteen pounds apiece in good & currant Countery pay to be paid to them in Concord currant price : allso I will & reserve to my selfe during my life a comfortable maintenance in all respects & y^ Charge of my maintenance upon my estate viz begine in the year one thousand six hundred eighty & two on to the day of my Death : which said Charge is to come out & be leavied upon my estate I meane this my estate in this my will given & legacyes bequeathed: & my will is y* when that all Charges concerning my maintenance & decent buryall & otherwise be satisfied : y* then each legacye & estate given doe then abate their due & true & just proportion: what y^ executors of this my will shall bring in account truly due all & each of my children sons & daughters resting contented with their due part of my estate in this my will given be it more or less ye whole ore but part here given: for I know not the ay of my death & so not what my comfortable maintenance may spend : I give to my sons Thomas & John my seven acers lying in ye corner nere Watertovsm lyne also my will is that no legacy shall be required untill two years after my death: these lands I give to my two sons Thomas & John their heirs & assigns be it more or less also I will constitute & make my two sons Thomas Wheeler & John Wheeler the executors of this my will & equally to pay all legacys each his equall p portion: This I George Wheeler Senior make this my laste will all my former Wills to be anullity & voide. Witness my hand & seal this twenty eight day of January in the year one thousand six hundred eighty & four.

Geoege Wheeler (Seal) His X mark Signed & sealed in presence of Samuel Meeiam, Jonathan Hubaed & John Scoethfoed. By his Excellency the Governor


 

Files coming soon.

CHARLES STEARNS WHEELER

https://websites.godaddy.com/en-US/editor/14307b55-d33a-4adb-be49-0b2c8611bd6e/cae4a307-de28-4829-a489-7c6b386a52e2/edit/d7c6a34a-d0c5-44a6-89fc-3800fa6c0aa7    

CHARLES STEARNS WHEELER family: 

  1. GEORGE WHEELER SR. m. KATHERINE PYN  
  2. CAPT. THOMAS WHEELER m. (1) SARAH MERIAM (2) SARAH STEARNS
  3. JOHN WHEELER m. (1) SARAH STEARNS (2) SARAH JONES  
  4. THOMAS WHEELER m. MARY MONROE 
  5. EDMUND WHEELER m. EUNICE MONROE 
  6. CHARLES WHEELER b. 25 April 1773 m. JULIA STEARNS
  7. CHARLES STEARNS WHEELER b. 19 Dec. 1816 d. 17 June 1843 


 Charles Stearns Wheeler was and important editing assistant and influence 

on Thoreau, Emerson and Tennyson and Wheeler-Thoreau Shanty

  • Charles Stearns Wheeler was Thoreau's classmate at Harvard [See Charles Stearns Wheeler: 
  • Friend of Emerson by John Olin Eidson, University of Georgia Press, 1951
  • Charles Stearns Wheeler graduated from Harvard in 1837. Taught in boys’ school. 
  • Then Greek tutor and history instruction at Harvard 1838 to 1842. 
  • Assisted Emerson editing 4 volumes of Carlyle’s “Miscellanies” published in Boston 1838 
  • and 1839; Emerson praised Wheeler’s editing in his letter to Carlyle  
  • Emerson made many mentions of diligent Wheeler assistance proof-reading.  
  • Wheeler edited Herodotus edition with notes + adopted as a text-book in the college. 
  • 1842 he edited poems of Tennyson in 2 volumes, published in Boston [noticed in the third 
  • volume of “The Dial,” page 273], by Margaret Fuller. Period 1841-42] 
  • Wheeler built the hut on Flint’s Pond shores half-way from Lincoln to Concord 
  • Charles Stearns Wheeler lived, studied + edited months at Flint’s Pond economically 
  • He was visited by Henry David Thoreau, who was member of his college class, with whom 
  • 2 or 3 years before he had camped on the shores of Flint’s Pond. 
  • The experiment on shores of Walden Pond doubtless came to Thoreau from Wheeler. 
  •  Spring of 1843 while studying abroad, Wheeler developed gastric fever and he died 
  • in Rome, on June 13, 1843  but 26 years of age. As a young person Charles Stearns Wheeler 
  • was recognized as a man of much promise. Athe tradition of his scholarship yet lingers, and 
  • he has been highly praised by  Thoreau, Emerson and Tennyson.  
  • [George Willis Cooke, A Historical and Biographical Introduction to the Dial (Cleveland: 
  • Rowfant Club, 1902) v. 2, pp. 161-165] [Thoreau Institute, Walden woods project]


"Concerning this episode in Wheeler’s life the following account has been given by Ellery Channing, in a letter to Frank B. Sanborn: “Stearns Wheeler built a ‘shanty’ on Flint’s Pond for the purpose of economy, for purchasing Greek books and going abroad to study. Whether Thoreau assisted him to build this shanty I cannot say, but I think he may have; also that he spent six weeks with him there. 


"As Thoreau was not too original and inventive to follow the example of others, if good to him, it is very probable this undertaking of Stearns Wheeler, whom he regarded (as I think I have heard him say) a heroic character, suggested his own experiment on Walden. I believe I visited this shanty with Thoreau. It was very plain, with bunks of straw, and built in the Irish manner. I think Wheeler was as good a mechanic as Thoreau, and built his shanty for his own use. The object of these two experiments was quite unlike, except in the common purpose of economy. It seems to me highly probable that Wheeler’s experiment suggested Thoreau’s, as he was a man he almost worshiped. But I could not understand what relation Lowell had to this fact, if it be one. Students in all parts of the earth have pursued a similar course from motives of economy, and to carry out some special study. Thoreau wished to study birds, flowers, and the stone age, just as Wheeler wished to study Greek. And Mr. Hotham [a theological student who lived in a cabin by Walden, in 1869-70] came next, from just the same motive of economy (necessity) and to study the Bible. The prudential sides of all three were the same.”


In the summer of 1842 Wheeler was able to carry out a long contemplated plan of study in Germany. In writing to Carlyle, on July 1 of that year, Emerson said: II Stearns Wheeler, the Cambridge tutor, a good Grecian, and the editor, you will remember, of your American editions, is going to London in August probably, and on to Heidelberg. He means, I believe, to spend two years in Germany and will come to see you on his way; a man whose too facile . and good-natured manners do some injustice to his virtues, to his great industry and real knowledge. He has been corresponding with your Tennyson, and editing his poems here.”


"After he was established in Heidelberg, Wheeler sent three or four letters to Emerson, which were published in “The Dial.” He also sent Schelling’s introductory lecture in Berlin, delivered in November, 1841. This was translated by Frederic H. Hedge. In the spring of 1843 Wheeler was attacked by gastric fever, of which he died at Rome, on June 13. He was but twenty-six years of age, and yet he was recognized by those who knew him as a man of much promise. A tradition of his scholarship yet lingers, and he has been highly praised by Emerson and others. 


When there came the first report of Wheeler’s death, Thoreau wrote to Emerson: “I should be slow to believe it. He was made to work very well in this world. There need be no tragedy in his death.” When the report was fully confirmed Thoreau wrote to his sister: “I think that Stearns Wheeler has left a gap in the community not easy to be filled. Though he did not exhibit the highest qualities of the scholar, he promised, in a remarkable degree, many of the essential and rarer ones; and his patient industry and energy, his reverent love of letters, and his proverbial accuracy, will cause him to be associated in my memory even with many venerable names of former days. It was not wholly unfit that so pure a lover of books should have ended his pilgrimage at the great book-mart of the world. I think of him as healthy and brave, and am confident that if he had lived, he would have proved useful in more ways than I can describe. He would have been an authority on all matters of fact, and a sort of connecting link between men and scholars of different walks and tastes. The literary enterprises he was planning for himself and friends remind me of an older and more studious time. So much, then, remains for us to do who survive.” 


In conveying the news of Charles Stearns Wheeler’s death to Thoreau, Emerson wrote : “You will have read and heard the sad news, to the little village of Lincoln, of Stearns Wheeler’s death. Such an overthrow to the hopes of his parents made me think more of them than of the loss the community will suffer in his kindness, diligence, and ingenuous mind.” 


A class-mate, John Weiss, wrote a poetical tribute to his friend, in which he said:

“Near Leipsic’s book-fair well book’d Wheeler lies;
Native to him the scholar’s high emprize.
Hill earliest books he plough’d from Lincoln’s soil,
Found sermons in its stones; there farmer’s toil
Toughened his sinews into mind, and made
His purpose steadfast.”


"The monument erected to Wheeler’s memory in Mount Auburn contained on one side this tribute: .. He was four years an able and faithful instructor in Harvard University. To the learning of the scholar he added the piety of the Christian. Ardent and indefatigable, in a short life he did the work of many years. Simple in manners, pure in heart, affectionate in disposition, he was beloved by all who knew him. His remains, restored to his native land, rest here.”


Wheeler was the first to die of the attendants upon the meetings of the transcendental club and of the contributors to “The Dial;” and his youth, together with the promise his life had given of scholarly attainments, endeared his memory to those who had known him most intimately. He was often spoken of with pathetic tenderness.

[George Willis Cooke, A Historical and Biographical Introduction to the Dial
(Cleveland: Rowfant Club, 1902) v. 2, pp. 161-165]

Files coming soon.
  • GEO WHEELER WALDEN POND
  • FINAL STAGE OF CREATION

Copyright © 2018 SCIENTIFICALLY LITERATE CHRISTIANS, TOO - All Rights Reserved.

Powered by GoDaddy Website Builder